• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用BOOST-II临床试验的高分辨率数据预测颅内高压和脑组织缺氧

Prediction of Intracranial Hypertension and Brain Tissue Hypoxia Utilizing High-Resolution Data from the BOOST-II Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Lazaridis Christos, Ajith Aswathy, Mansour Ali, Okonkwo David O, Diaz-Arrastia Ramon, Mayampurath Anoop

机构信息

Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Neurotrauma Rep. 2022 Oct 27;3(1):473-478. doi: 10.1089/neur.2022.0055. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1089/neur.2022.0055
PMID:36337077
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9622207/
Abstract

The current approach to intracranial hypertension and brain tissue hypoxia is reactive, based on fixed thresholds. We used statistical machine learning on high-frequency intracranial pressure (ICP) and partial brain tissue oxygen tension (PbtO) data obtained from the BOOST-II trial with the goal of constructing robust quantitative models to predict ICP/PbtO crises. We derived the following machine learning models: logistic regression (LR), elastic net, and random forest. We split the data set into 70-30% for training and testing and utilized a discrete-time survival analysis framework and 5-fold hyperparameter optimization strategy for all models. We compared model performances on discrimination between events and non-events of increased ICP or low PbtO with the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. We further analyzed clinical utility through a decision curve analysis (DCA). When considering discrimination, the number of features, and interpretability, we identified the RF model that combined the most recent ICP reading, episode number, and longitudinal trends over the preceding 30 min as the best performing for predicting ICP crisis events within the next 30 min (AUC 0.78). For PbtO, the LR model utilizing the most recent reading, episode number, and longitudinal trends over the preceding 30 min was the best performing (AUC, 0.84). The DCA showed clinical usefulness for wide risk of thresholds for both ICP and PbtO predictions. Acceptable alerting thresholds could range from 20% to 80% depending on a patient-specific assessment of the benefit-risk ratio of a given intervention in response to the alert.

摘要

目前针对颅内高压和脑组织缺氧的处理方法是基于固定阈值的被动反应式方法。我们对从BOOST-II试验中获得的高频颅内压(ICP)和部分脑组织氧分压(PbtO)数据使用了统计机器学习方法,目的是构建强大的定量模型来预测ICP/PbtO危机。我们推导了以下机器学习模型:逻辑回归(LR)、弹性网络和随机森林。我们将数据集按70-30%的比例划分为训练集和测试集,并对所有模型采用离散时间生存分析框架和5折超参数优化策略。我们通过接受者操作特征(AUROC)曲线下的面积来比较模型在区分ICP升高或PbtO降低的事件与非事件方面的性能。我们通过决策曲线分析(DCA)进一步分析了临床实用性。在考虑区分能力、特征数量和可解释性时,我们确定结合最近的ICP读数、发作次数以及前30分钟内的纵向趋势的随机森林模型在预测未来30分钟内的ICP危机事件方面表现最佳(AUC为0.78)。对于PbtO,利用最近读数、发作次数以及前30分钟内纵向趋势的逻辑回归模型表现最佳(AUC为0.84)。决策曲线分析表明,对于ICP和PbtO预测的广泛风险阈值具有临床实用性。根据对特定患者针对警报做出的给定干预的获益-风险比的评估,可接受的警报阈值范围可以从20%到80%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7e1/9622207/ca3f78164c18/neur.2022.0055_figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7e1/9622207/205a5f7bce6e/neur.2022.0055_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7e1/9622207/ca3f78164c18/neur.2022.0055_figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7e1/9622207/205a5f7bce6e/neur.2022.0055_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7e1/9622207/ca3f78164c18/neur.2022.0055_figure2.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction of Intracranial Hypertension and Brain Tissue Hypoxia Utilizing High-Resolution Data from the BOOST-II Clinical Trial.利用BOOST-II临床试验的高分辨率数据预测颅内高压和脑组织缺氧
Neurotrauma Rep. 2022 Oct 27;3(1):473-478. doi: 10.1089/neur.2022.0055. eCollection 2022.
2
Prediction of intracranial pressure crises after severe traumatic brain injury using machine learning algorithms.利用机器学习算法预测严重创伤性脑损伤后的颅内压危象。
J Neurosurg. 2023 Jan 27;139(2):528-535. doi: 10.3171/2022.12.JNS221860. Print 2023 Aug 1.
3
The relationship between intracranial pressure and brain oxygenation in children with severe traumatic brain injury.儿童严重创伤性脑损伤患者颅内压与脑氧合的关系。
Neurosurgery. 2012 May;70(5):1220-30; discussion 1231. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318243fc59.
4
Detection of cerebral hypoperfusion with a dynamic hyperoxia test using brain oxygenation pressure monitoring.利用脑氧压监测进行动态高氧试验检测脑灌注不足。
Crit Care. 2022 Feb 7;26(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-03918-0.
5
Evaluation of the relationship between slow-waves of intracranial pressure, mean arterial pressure and brain tissue oxygen in TBI: a CENTER-TBI exploratory analysis.评估 TBI 患者颅内压慢波、平均动脉压和脑组织氧之间的关系:CENTER-TBI 探索性分析。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Aug;35(4):711-722. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00527-6. Epub 2020 May 16.
6
[Application of continuous monitoring of intracranial pressure and brain oxygen partial pressure in the treatment of patients with severe craniocerebral injury].颅内压及脑氧分压连续监测在重型颅脑损伤患者治疗中的应用
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Apr;33(4):449-454. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20201106-00700.
7
Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Model for the Early Prediction of Doses of Harmful Intracranial Pressure in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.用于早期预测重度创伤性脑损伤患者有害颅内压剂量的机器学习模型的开发与外部验证
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Mar;40(5-6):514-522. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0251. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
8
Are initial radiographic and clinical scales associated with subsequent intracranial pressure and brain oxygen levels after severe traumatic brain injury?初始影像学和临床量表与严重创伤性脑损伤后的颅内压和脑氧水平有关吗?
Neurosurgery. 2012 May;70(5):1095-105; discussion 1105. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318240c1ed.
9
Lung Injury Is a Predictor of Cerebral Hypoxia and Mortality in Traumatic Brain Injury.肺损伤是创伤性脑损伤中脑缺氧和死亡率的一个预测指标。
Front Neurol. 2020 Aug 7;11:771. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00771. eCollection 2020.
10
Exploration of the relationship between partial pressure of brain tissue oxygen and intracranial pressure.脑组织氧分压与颅内压关系的探讨
Brain Spine. 2024 Jun 9;4:102848. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.102848. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Classification of intracranial pressure epochs using a novel machine learning framework.使用新型机器学习框架对颅内压时段进行分类。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Apr 11;8(1):201. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01612-3.
2
Derivation, external and clinical validation of a deep learning approach for detecting intracranial hypertension.一种用于检测颅内高压的深度学习方法的推导、外部验证及临床验证
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Sep 5;7(1):233. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01227-0.
3
Derivation, External Validation and Clinical Implications of a deep learning approach for intracranial pressure estimation using non-cranial waveform measurements.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving Traumatic Brain Injury Care and Research: A Report From the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.改善创伤性脑损伤的护理与研究:美国国家科学院、工程院和医学院的一份报告
JAMA. 2022 Feb 1;327(5):419-420. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.0089.
2
Impact of duration and magnitude of raised intracranial pressure on outcome after severe traumatic brain injury: A CENTER-TBI high-resolution group study.颅内压升高的持续时间和幅度对严重创伤性脑损伤后结局的影响:CENTER-TBI 高分辨率组研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 14;15(12):e0243427. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243427. eCollection 2020.
3
Prediction model for intracranial hypertension demonstrates robust performance during external validation on the CENTER-TBI dataset.
一种使用非颅骨波形测量进行颅内压估计的深度学习方法的推导、外部验证及临床意义
medRxiv. 2024 Jan 30:2024.01.30.24301974. doi: 10.1101/2024.01.30.24301974.
4
Management Strategies Based on Multi-Modality Neuromonitoring in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.基于多模态神经监测的严重创伤性脑损伤管理策略。
Neurotherapeutics. 2023 Oct;20(6):1457-1471. doi: 10.1007/s13311-023-01411-2. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
5
Multi-Mechanistic Approaches to the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Review.创伤性脑损伤治疗的多机制方法:综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 11;12(6):2179. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062179.
颅内高压预测模型在CENTER-TBI数据集的外部验证过程中表现出强大的性能。
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Jan;47(1):124-126. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06247-4. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
4
Effect of a Machine Learning-Derived Early Warning System for Intraoperative Hypotension vs Standard Care on Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension During Elective Noncardiac Surgery: The HYPE Randomized Clinical Trial.机器学习衍生的术中低血压预警系统与标准护理对择期非心脏手术期间术中低血压深度和持续时间的影响:HYPE 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Mar 17;323(11):1052-1060. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0592.
5
A management algorithm for adult patients with both brain oxygen and intracranial pressure monitoring: the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC).成人脑氧和颅内压监测患者的管理算法:西雅图国际严重创伤性脑损伤共识会议(SIBICC)。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 May;46(5):919-929. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05900-x. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
6
Patient-specific ICP Epidemiologic Thresholds in Adult Traumatic Brain Injury: A CENTER-TBI Validation Study.成人创伤性脑损伤中基于患者个体的 ICP 流行病学阈值:CENTER-TBI 验证研究。
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2021 Jan;33(1):28-38. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000616.
7
Secondary brain injury: Predicting and preventing insults.二次脑损伤:预测和预防损伤。
Neuropharmacology. 2019 Feb;145(Pt B):145-152. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
8
Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury.估计创伤性脑损伤的全球发病率。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr 27;130(4):1080-1097. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.JNS17352. Print 2019 Apr 1.
9
Brain Oxygen Optimization in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Phase-II: A Phase II Randomized Trial.严重创伤性脑损伤II期脑氧优化:一项II期随机试验
Crit Care Med. 2017 Nov;45(11):1907-1914. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002619.
10
Functional Outcome After Intracranial Pressure Monitoring for Children With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.重症创伤性脑损伤患儿颅内压监测后的功能转归
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Oct 1;171(10):965-971. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.2127.