• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 TBI 患者颅内压慢波、平均动脉压和脑组织氧之间的关系:CENTER-TBI 探索性分析。

Evaluation of the relationship between slow-waves of intracranial pressure, mean arterial pressure and brain tissue oxygen in TBI: a CENTER-TBI exploratory analysis.

机构信息

Division of Anaesthesia, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Department of Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, R3A 1R9, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Aug;35(4):711-722. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00527-6. Epub 2020 May 16.

DOI:10.1007/s10877-020-00527-6
PMID:32418148
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8286934/
Abstract

Brain tissue oxygen (PbtO) monitoring in traumatic brain injury (TBI) has demonstrated strong associations with global outcome. Additionally, PbtO signals have been used to derive indices thought to be associated with cerebrovascular reactivity in TBI. However, their true relationship to slow-wave vasogenic fluctuations associated with cerebral autoregulation remains unclear. The goal of this study was to investigate the relationship between slow-wave fluctuations of intracranial pressure (ICP), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and PbtO over time. Using the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) high resolution ICU sub-study cohort, we evaluated those patients with recorded high-frequency digital intra-parenchymal ICP and PbtO monitoring data of a minimum of 6 h in duration. Digital physiologic signals were processed for ICP, MAP, and PbtO slow-waves using a moving average filter to decimate the high-frequency signal. The first 5 days of recording were analyzed. The relationship between ICP, MAP and PbtO slow-waves over time were assessed using autoregressive integrative moving average (ARIMA) and vector autoregressive integrative moving average (VARIMA) modelling, as well as Granger causality testing. A total of 47 patients were included. The ARIMA structure of ICP and MAP were similar in time, where PbtO displayed different optimal structure. VARIMA modelling and IRF plots confirmed the strong directional relationship between MAP and ICP, demonstrating an ICP response to MAP impulse. PbtO slow-waves, however, failed to demonstrate a definite response to ICP and MAP slow-wave impulses. These results raise questions as to the utility of PbtO in the derivation of cerebrovascular reactivity measures in TBI. There is a reproducible relationship between slow-wave fluctuations of ICP and MAP, as demonstrated across various time-series analytic techniques. PbtO does not appear to reliably respond in time to slow-wave fluctuations in MAP, as demonstrated on various VARIMA models across all patients. These findings suggest that PbtO should not be utilized in the derivation of cerebrovascular reactivity metrics in TBI, as it does not appear to be responsive to changes in MAP in the slow-waves. These findings corroborate previous results regarding PbtO based cerebrovascular reactivity indices.

摘要

脑氧(PbtO)监测在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)中已被证明与整体预后有很强的相关性。此外,PbtO 信号已被用于推导被认为与 TBI 中脑血管反应性相关的指数。然而,它们与与脑自动调节相关的慢波血管源性波动的真正关系仍不清楚。本研究的目的是探讨颅内压(ICP)、平均动脉压(MAP)和 PbtO 随时间的慢波变化之间的关系。使用协作欧洲神经创伤效力研究在创伤性脑损伤(CENTER-TBI)高分辨率 ICU 子研究队列中,我们评估了那些记录有至少 6 小时高频率数字脑室内 ICP 和 PbtO 监测数据的患者。使用移动平均滤波器对数字生理信号进行 ICP、MAP 和 PbtO 慢波处理,以对高频信号进行细化。分析了记录的前 5 天。使用自回归综合移动平均(ARIMA)和向量自回归综合移动平均(VARIMA)模型以及格兰杰因果关系检验评估了 ICP、MAP 和 PbtO 慢波随时间的关系。共纳入 47 例患者。ARIMA 结构在时间上,ICP 和 MAP 相似,而 PbtO 显示出不同的最佳结构。VARIMA 模型和 IRF 图证实了 MAP 和 ICP 之间的强烈方向关系,表明 ICP 对 MAP 脉冲的响应。然而,PbtO 慢波未能对 ICP 和 MAP 慢波脉冲表现出明确的反应。这些结果引发了关于 PbtO 在 TBI 中推导脑血管反应性测量的实用性的问题。在各种时间序列分析技术中,已经证明了 ICP 和 MAP 慢波波动之间存在可重复的关系。在所有患者的各种 VARIMA 模型上,PbtO 似乎都不能可靠地对 MAP 的慢波波动及时做出反应。这些发现表明,在 TBI 中推导脑血管反应性指标时不应该使用 PbtO,因为它似乎对 MAP 在慢波中的变化没有反应。这些发现与之前关于基于 PbtO 的脑血管反应性指数的结果相吻合。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de18/8286934/0c929de6d5be/10877_2020_527_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de18/8286934/e143bea2dfcf/10877_2020_527_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de18/8286934/0c929de6d5be/10877_2020_527_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de18/8286934/e143bea2dfcf/10877_2020_527_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de18/8286934/0c929de6d5be/10877_2020_527_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the relationship between slow-waves of intracranial pressure, mean arterial pressure and brain tissue oxygen in TBI: a CENTER-TBI exploratory analysis.评估 TBI 患者颅内压慢波、平均动脉压和脑组织氧之间的关系:CENTER-TBI 探索性分析。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Aug;35(4):711-722. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00527-6. Epub 2020 May 16.
2
Brain Tissue Oxygen and Cerebrovascular Reactivity in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury Exploratory Analysis of Insult Burden.颅脑创伤中的脑组织氧合与脑血管反应性:颅脑创伤欧洲神经创伤有效性研究协作组的一项关于损伤负担的探索性分析
J Neurotrauma. 2020 Sep 1;37(17):1854-1863. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7024. Epub 2020 May 4.
3
Statistical Cerebrovascular Reactivity Signal Properties after Secondary Decompressive Craniectomy in Traumatic Brain Injury: A CENTER-TBI Pilot Analysis.创伤性脑损伤二次去骨瓣减压术后的统计脑血管反应性信号特征:CENTER-TBI 初步分析。
J Neurotrauma. 2020 Jun 1;37(11):1306-1314. doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6726. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
4
Comparison of high versus low frequency cerebral physiology for cerebrovascular reactivity assessment in traumatic brain injury: a multi-center pilot study.对比高与低频率脑生理用于创伤性脑损伤脑血管反应性评估:一项多中心初步研究。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2020 Oct;34(5):971-994. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00392-y. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
5
Descriptive analysis of low versus elevated intracranial pressure on cerebral physiology in adult traumatic brain injury: a CENTER-TBI exploratory study.成人创伤性脑损伤中颅内压低与颅内压升高对脑生理的描述性分析:CENTER-TBI 探索性研究。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Nov;162(11):2695-2706. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04485-5. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
6
Changes in Cerebral Partial Oxygen Pressure and Cerebrovascular Reactivity During Intracranial Pressure Plateau Waves.颅内压平台波期间脑局部氧分压和脑血管反应性的变化
Neurocrit Care. 2015 Aug;23(1):85-91. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-0074-9.
7
Cerebrovascular pressure reactivity and brain tissue oxygen monitoring provide complementary information regarding the lower and upper limits of cerebral blood flow control in traumatic brain injury: a CAnadian High Resolution-TBI (CAHR-TBI) cohort study.脑血管压力反应性和脑组织氧监测为创伤性脑损伤中脑血流控制的下限和上限提供了互补信息:一项加拿大高分辨率创伤性脑损伤(CAHR-TBI)队列研究。
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2022 Dec 23;10(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s40635-022-00482-3.
8
Plateau Waves of Intracranial Pressure and Partial Pressure of Cerebral Oxygen.颅内压与脑氧分压的高原波
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2016;122:177-9. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-22533-3_36.
9
Cerebral physiologic insult burden in acute traumatic neural injury: a Canadian High Resolution-TBI (CAHR-TBI) descriptive analysis.急性创伤性神经损伤中的脑生理损伤负担:加拿大高分辨率颅脑损伤(CAHR-TBI)描述性分析。
Crit Care. 2024 Sep 4;28(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05083-y.
10
Focal brain oxygen, blood flow, and intracranial pressure measurements in relation to optimal cerebral perfusion pressure.与最佳脑灌注压相关的局部脑氧、血流和颅内压测量。
J Neurosurg. 2023 Nov 17;140(5):1423-1433. doi: 10.3171/2023.8.JNS231519. Print 2024 May 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Multivariate linear time-series modeling and prediction of cerebral physiologic signals: review of statistical models and implications for human signal analytics.脑生理信号的多变量线性时间序列建模与预测:统计模型综述及其对人类信号分析的意义
Front Netw Physiol. 2025 Apr 16;5:1551043. doi: 10.3389/fnetp.2025.1551043. eCollection 2025.
2
Individualized autoregulation-guided arterial blood pressure management in neurocritical care.神经重症监护中基于个体化自动调节指导的动脉血压管理
Neurotherapeutics. 2025 Jan;22(1):e00526. doi: 10.1016/j.neurot.2025.e00526. Epub 2025 Jan 18.
3
Revisiting the oxygen reactivity index in traumatic brain injury: the complementary value of combined focal and global autoregulation monitoring.

本文引用的文献

1
Brain Tissue Oxygen and Cerebrovascular Reactivity in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury Exploratory Analysis of Insult Burden.颅脑创伤中的脑组织氧合与脑血管反应性:颅脑创伤欧洲神经创伤有效性研究协作组的一项关于损伤负担的探索性分析
J Neurotrauma. 2020 Sep 1;37(17):1854-1863. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7024. Epub 2020 May 4.
2
The CAnadian High-Resolution Traumatic Brain Injury (CAHR-TBI) Research Collaborative.加拿大高分辨率创伤性脑损伤(CAHR-TBI)研究协作组
Can J Neurol Sci. 2020 Jul;47(4):551-556. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2020.54. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
3
重新审视创伤性脑损伤中的氧反应性指数:联合局部和整体自动调节监测的互补价值。
Crit Care. 2025 Jan 12;29(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05261-6.
4
Association Between Clinical Measures of Depth of Sedation and Multimodal Cerebral Physiology in Acute Traumatic Neural Injury.急性创伤性神经损伤中镇静深度的临床指标与多模态脑生理学之间的关联
Neurotrauma Rep. 2024 Oct 2;5(1):916-956. doi: 10.1089/neur.2024.0090. eCollection 2024.
5
Exploration of the relationship between partial pressure of brain tissue oxygen and intracranial pressure.脑组织氧分压与颅内压关系的探讨
Brain Spine. 2024 Jun 9;4:102848. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.102848. eCollection 2024.
6
Time-Series Modeling and Forecasting of Cerebral Pressure-Flow Physiology: A Scoping Systematic Review of the Human and Animal Literature.时间序列建模与脑压力-血流生理学预测:人类和动物文献的系统性综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Feb 23;24(5):1453. doi: 10.3390/s24051453.
7
The impact of sedative and vasopressor agents on cerebrovascular reactivity in severe traumatic brain injury.镇静剂和血管加压药对重度创伤性脑损伤患者脑血管反应性的影响。
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2023 Aug 5;11(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s40635-023-00524-4.
8
Non-Invasive Mapping of Cerebral Autoregulation Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: A Study Protocol.使用近红外光谱技术对脑自动调节进行无创映射:一项研究方案
Methods Protoc. 2023 Jun 9;6(3):58. doi: 10.3390/mps6030058.
9
Temporal relationship between vasopressor and sedative administration and cerebrovascular response in traumatic brain injury: a time-series analysis.创伤性脑损伤中血管升压药与镇静剂使用的时间关系及脑血管反应:一项时间序列分析
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2023 May 29;11(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40635-023-00515-5.
10
Cerebrovascular Reactivity Is Not Associated With Therapeutic Intensity in Adult Traumatic Brain Injury: A Validation Study.脑血管反应性与成人创伤性脑损伤的治疗强度无关:一项验证性研究。
Neurotrauma Rep. 2023 May 12;4(1):307-317. doi: 10.1089/neur.2023.0011. eCollection 2023.
A management algorithm for adult patients with both brain oxygen and intracranial pressure monitoring: the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC).
成人脑氧和颅内压监测患者的管理算法:西雅图国际严重创伤性脑损伤共识会议(SIBICC)。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 May;46(5):919-929. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05900-x. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
4
Statistical Cerebrovascular Reactivity Signal Properties after Secondary Decompressive Craniectomy in Traumatic Brain Injury: A CENTER-TBI Pilot Analysis.创伤性脑损伤二次去骨瓣减压术后的统计脑血管反应性信号特征:CENTER-TBI 初步分析。
J Neurotrauma. 2020 Jun 1;37(11):1306-1314. doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6726. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
5
A management algorithm for patients with intracranial pressure monitoring: the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC).颅内压监测患者的管理算法:西雅图国际严重创伤性脑损伤共识会议(SIBICC)。
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Dec;45(12):1783-1794. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05805-9. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
6
Comparison of high versus low frequency cerebral physiology for cerebrovascular reactivity assessment in traumatic brain injury: a multi-center pilot study.对比高与低频率脑生理用于创伤性脑损伤脑血管反应性评估:一项多中心初步研究。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2020 Oct;34(5):971-994. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00392-y. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
7
Model of Critical Cerebral Oxygenation after Traumatic Brain Injury: Implications for Rescuing Hypoxic Tissue.创伤性脑损伤后关键脑氧代谢模型:对拯救缺氧组织的影响。
J Neurotrauma. 2019 Jul 1;36(13):2109-2116. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.6187. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
8
Minimal PaO2 threshold after traumatic brain injury and clinical utility of a novel brain oxygenation ratio.创伤性脑损伤后的最低动脉血氧分压阈值及一种新型脑氧合比的临床应用价值
J Neurosurg. 2018 Nov 2;131(5):1639-1647. doi: 10.3171/2018.5.JNS18651. Print 2019 Nov 1.
9
Central versus Local Radiological Reading of Acute Computed Tomography Characteristics in Multi-Center Traumatic Brain Injury Research.多中心创伤性脑损伤研究中急性计算机断层扫描特征的中央与局部放射学阅读。
J Neurotrauma. 2019 Apr 1;36(7):1080-1092. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.6061. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
10
Non-Invasive Pressure Reactivity Index Using Doppler Systolic Flow Parameters: A Pilot Analysis.使用多普勒收缩期血流参数的无创压力反应指数:初步分析。
J Neurotrauma. 2019 Mar 1;36(5):713-720. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.5987. Epub 2018 Sep 27.