Gómez Ricardo L, Suárez Ana María
Datus Research & Evaluation Group, Universidad de Antioquia, School of Education, Carrera 50A # 63-96, Medellín 050012, Colombia.
Int J Educ Res Open. 2021;2:100048. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100048. Epub 2021 May 9.
The disruption in higher education caused by the COVID-19 pandemic has led to renewed interest in implementing communities of practice (CoPs) as a feasible mechanism for delivering faculty development. The construct of is cited in the literature among the most important strategies for professional development. However, empirical evidence of the impact of CoPs on teaching and learning is scarce and we still know little about the extent to which faculty participation in CoPs affect their teaching practices and students' learning and achievement. This scoping review aims to collect, synthesize, and map existing evidence about the impact of CoPs in higher education. The review is guided by a conceptual framework, which incorporates six elements underlying the purpose and expected outcomes of CoPs: resources and the capacity to mobilize them, knowledge management activities and the expansion of knowledge, changes in policy and practice, and impact on higher education outcomes.
由新冠疫情导致的高等教育中断,使得人们重新对实施实践社区(CoP)产生兴趣,将其作为提供教师发展的一种可行机制。实践社区这一概念在文献中被列为专业发展的最重要策略之一。然而,关于实践社区对教学影响的实证证据很少,我们对教师参与实践社区在多大程度上影响他们的教学实践以及学生的学习和成绩仍然知之甚少。本范围综述旨在收集、综合并梳理关于实践社区在高等教育中影响的现有证据。该综述以一个概念框架为指导,该框架包含实践社区的目的和预期成果所基于的六个要素:资源及其调动能力、知识管理活动和知识扩展、政策和实践的变化以及对高等教育成果的影响。