Kim Chee Hae, Yang Seokhun, Zhang Jinlong, Lee Joo Myung, Hoshino Masahiro, Murai Tadashi, Hwang Doyeon, Shin Eun-Seok, Doh Joon-Hyung, Nam Chang-Wook, Wang Jianan, Chen Shao-Liang, Tanaka Nobuhiro, Matsuo Hitoshi, Akasaka Takashi, Kakuta Tsunekazu, Koo Bon-Kwon
Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, South Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
JACC Asia. 2022 Mar 29;2(2):157-167. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.11.011. eCollection 2022 Apr.
The mechanism of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) difference according to sex has not been clearly understood.
This study sought to evaluate sex differences in coronary stenosis, plaque characteristics, and left ventricular (LV) mass and their implications for physiological significance.
This was a post hoc analysis of a pooled population of multicenter, international prospective cohorts. Patients (166 women and 489 men) underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) within 90 days before invasive FFR measurements were included. The minimal lumen area, percent of plaque burden, whole vessel plaque volume by composition, high-risk plaque characteristics, and LV mass were analyzed from CCTA images.
Among 1,188 vessels analyzed, the FFR value was higher in women than that in men (0.85 ± 0.13 vs 0.82 ± 0.14; 0.001) despite a similar percentage of diameter stenosis between the sexes (45.9% ± 18.9% vs 46.1% ± 17.7%; 0.920). The composition of fibrofatty plaque + necrotic core (13.1% ± 16.9% vs 21.2% ± 19.9%; < 0.001) and frequencies of low attenuation plaque (12.7% vs 24.5%; < 0.001) and positive remodeling (33.8% vs 45.5%; = 0.001) were lower in women than in men. Vessel, plaque, and lumen volumes were significantly smaller in women than that in men (all < 0.001); however, no sex difference was observed in any of these parameters after adjustment for LV mass (all > 0.10). Sex was not an independent predictor of the FFR value after adjustment for stenosis severity, plaque characteristics, and LV mass.
Higher FFR values for the same stenosis severity in women can be explained by fewer high-risk plaque characteristics and smaller myocardial mass in women than that in men. (CCTA-FFR Registry for Risk Prediction; NCT04037163).
目前尚不清楚基于性别的血流储备分数(FFR)差异机制。
本研究旨在评估冠状动脉狭窄、斑块特征和左心室(LV)质量的性别差异及其对生理意义的影响。
这是一项对多中心国际前瞻性队列汇总人群的事后分析。纳入在有创FFR测量前90天内接受冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)的患者(166名女性和489名男性)。从CCTA图像分析最小管腔面积、斑块负荷百分比、按成分划分的全血管斑块体积、高危斑块特征和LV质量。
在分析的1188支血管中,女性的FFR值高于男性(0.85±0.13对0.82±0.14;P=0.001),尽管两性之间的直径狭窄百分比相似(45.9%±18.9%对46.1%±17.7%;P=0.920)。女性的纤维脂肪斑块+坏死核心成分(13.1%±16.9%对21.2%±19.9%;P<0.001)、低衰减斑块频率(12.7%对24.5%;P<0.001)和阳性重塑频率(33.8%对45.5%;P=0.001)均低于男性。女性的血管、斑块和管腔体积明显小于男性(均P<0.001);然而,在调整LV质量后,这些参数中均未观察到性别差异(均P>0.10)。在调整狭窄严重程度、斑块特征和LV质量后,性别不是FFR值的独立预测因素。
女性在相同狭窄严重程度下较高的FFR值可以解释为女性的高危斑块特征较少且心肌质量小于男性。(用于风险预测的CCTA-FFR注册研究;NCT04037163)