Suppr超能文献

不同类型药物洗脱支架用于初发长冠状动脉病变的比较

Comparison of Different Types of Drug-Eluting Stents for De Novo Long Coronary Artery Lesions.

作者信息

Kang Do-Yoon, Jang Jae-Sik, Chang Mineok, Lee Cheol Hyun, Lee Pil Hyung, Ahn Jung-Min, Lee Seung-Whan, Kim Young-Hak, Park Seong-Wook, Park Duk-Woo, Park Seung-Jung

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Heart Institute, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Division of Cardiology, Busan Paik Hospital, University of Inje College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea.

出版信息

JACC Asia. 2022 May 24;2(4):446-456. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.02.009. eCollection 2022 Aug.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for diffuse long lesions remain relatively unfavorable. Prior clinical trials investigated the relative efficacy and safety of different types of drug-eluting stents (DES) in long lesions.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare the relative performance of different types of DES for de novo long (≥25 mm) coronary artery lesions.

METHODS

Using a pooled analysis of individual data of 1,450 patients from 3 randomized clinical trials, we compared angiographic and clinical outcomes of 5 different types of DES: 224 patients with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (EES), 255 with platinum-chromium EES, 250 with Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents, 245 with biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents, and 476 with first-generation sirolimus-eluting stents (SES). The primary endpoint was in-segment late lumen loss at 9 months.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint was not significantly different between 4 second-generation DES and 1 first-generation SES (0.17 ± 0.41 mm in cobalt-chromium EES; 0.11 ± 0.37 in platinum-chromium EES: 0.14 ± 0.38 in Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents; 0.14 ± 0.38 in biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents; or 0.10 ± 0.37 in SES, respectively, overall 0.38). Also, there were no significant between-group differences with respect to death, myocardial infarction, target-vessel revascularization, or stent thrombosis at 12 months. In the multiple treatment propensity-score analysis, the risk of angiographic and clinical outcomes was also similar among several types of DES.

CONCLUSIONS

In this patient-level pooled analysis, several second-generation DES showed similar angiographic and clinical outcomes in patients with de novo long coronary lesions. (Percutaneous Treatment of LONG Native Coronary Lesions With Drug-Eluting Stent-III [LONG-DES-III]; NCT01078038; Percutaneous Treatment of LONG Native Coronary Lesions With Drug-Eluting Stent-IV [LONG-DES-IV]; NCT01186094; and Everolimus-eluting [PROMUS-ELEMENT] vs. Biolimus A9-Eluting [NOBORI] Stents for Long-Coronary Lesions [LONG-DES-V]; NCT01186120).

摘要

背景

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗弥漫性长病变的结果仍然相对不理想。先前的临床试验研究了不同类型药物洗脱支架(DES)在长病变中的相对疗效和安全性。

目的

本研究旨在比较不同类型DES用于初发长(≥25毫米)冠状动脉病变的相对性能。

方法

通过对来自3项随机临床试验的1450例患者的个体数据进行汇总分析,我们比较了5种不同类型DES的血管造影和临床结果:224例使用钴铬依维莫司洗脱支架(EES),255例使用铂铬EES,250例使用雷帕霉素洗脱支架,245例使用可生物降解聚合物生物雷帕霉素洗脱支架,476例使用第一代西罗莫司洗脱支架(SES)。主要终点是9个月时节段内晚期管腔丢失。

结果

4种第二代DES与1种第一代SES之间的主要终点无显著差异(钴铬EES为0.17±0.41毫米;铂铬EES为0.11±0.37;雷帕霉素洗脱支架为0.14±;可生物降解聚合物生物雷帕霉素洗脱支架为0.14±;SES为0.10±,总体为0.38)。此外,在12个月时,死亡、心肌梗死、靶血管血运重建或支架血栓形成方面组间也无显著差异。在多重治疗倾向评分分析中,几种类型DES在血管造影和临床结果方面的风险也相似。

结论

在这项患者水平的汇总分析中,几种第二代DES在初发长冠状动脉病变患者中显示出相似的血管造影和临床结果。(药物洗脱支架治疗长冠状动脉病变III [LONG-DES-III];NCT01078038;药物洗脱支架治疗长冠状动脉病变IV [LONG-DES-IV];NCT01186094;以及依维莫司洗脱[PROMUS-ELEMENT]与生物雷帕霉素A9洗脱[NOBORI]支架治疗长冠状动脉病变[LONG-DES-V];NCT01186120)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c3e/9627890/31017bc09767/fx1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验