• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effect of uninterrupted dabigatran or rivaroxaban on achieving ideal activated clotting time to heparin response during catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation.不间断服用达比加群或利伐沙班对心房颤动患者导管消融期间达到肝素反应理想活化凝血时间的影响。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2022 Aug 28;19(8):565-574. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2022.08.004.
2
[Impact of different anticoagulation therapies on heparin dosage applied to atrial fibrillation patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation].[不同抗凝治疗对接受心房颤动导管消融术的心房颤动患者肝素用量的影响]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2019 Aug 24;47(8):602-607. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2019.08.003.
3
Appropriate intraprocedural initial heparin dosing in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation receiving uninterrupted non-vitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulant treatment.在接受不间断非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝治疗的房颤患者行导管消融术中,给予适当的术中初始肝素剂量。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Apr 27;21(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02032-3.
4
Different Kinetics of Activated Clotting Time Among Uninterrupted Oral Anticoagulants During Catheter Ablation Procedure.不同口服抗凝药物在导管消融术中对激活凝血时间的影响。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jun;62(6):792-800. doi: 10.1002/jcph.2018. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
5
Safety of novel oral anticoagulants compared with uninterrupted warfarin for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.新型口服抗凝剂与不间断使用华法林相比用于房颤导管消融术的安全性。
Ann Pharmacother. 2015 Mar;49(3):278-84. doi: 10.1177/1060028014563950. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
6
Differences in activated clotting time among uninterrupted anticoagulants during the periprocedural period of atrial fibrillation ablation.心房颤动消融围手术期不同不间断抗凝药物的活化凝血时间差异。
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Sep;12(9):1972-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.04.016. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
7
Safety of new oral anticoagulants for patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation.新型口服抗凝药用于心房颤动消融患者的安全性
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Jun;40(1):33-8. doi: 10.1007/s10840-014-9888-9. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
8
Effects of uninterrupted dabigatran on the intensity of anticoagulation during atrial fibrillation ablation.房颤消融期间不间断使用达比加群对抗凝强度的影响。
J Arrhythm. 2021 Nov 19;38(1):58-66. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12655. eCollection 2022 Feb.
9
Adequate Initial Heparin Dosage for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Patients Receiving Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants.接受非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂治疗的心房颤动消融患者的初始肝素剂量适宜性
Clin Drug Investig. 2016 Oct;36(10):837-48. doi: 10.1007/s40261-016-0435-6.
10
Differences in activated clotting time and total unfractionated heparin dose during pulmonary vein isolation in patients on different anticoagulation therapy.不同抗凝治疗患者行肺静脉隔离术时激活凝血时间和普通肝素总剂量的差异。
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Aug;44(8):1177-1182. doi: 10.1002/clc.23681. Epub 2021 Jul 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Appropriate intraprocedural initial heparin dosing in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation receiving uninterrupted non-vitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulant treatment.在接受不间断非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝治疗的房颤患者行导管消融术中,给予适当的术中初始肝素剂量。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Apr 27;21(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02032-3.
2
2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: Executive summary.2017年心房颤动导管消融与外科消融专家共识声明:执行摘要(由心律学会/欧洲心律协会/欧洲心血管病预防与康复协会/亚太心律学会/拉丁美洲心脏电生理与心脏起搏学会发布)
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Oct;14(10):e445-e494. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.07.009. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
3
Thromboembolic and bleeding risks in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation: oral anticoagulation perspectives.心房颤动消融术患者的血栓栓塞和出血风险:口服抗凝治疗的观点
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2017 Jul;16(7):769-777. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2017.1325867. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
4
Impact of the Direct Oral Anticoagulants on Activated Clotting Time.直接口服抗凝剂对活化凝血时间的影响。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017 Feb;31(1):e24-e27. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
5
2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS.2016年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)合作制定的心房颤动管理指南。
Europace. 2016 Nov;18(11):1609-1678. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw295. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
6
Adequate Initial Heparin Dosage for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Patients Receiving Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants.接受非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂治疗的心房颤动消融患者的初始肝素剂量适宜性
Clin Drug Investig. 2016 Oct;36(10):837-48. doi: 10.1007/s40261-016-0435-6.
7
Feasibility and safety of uninterrupted dabigatran therapy in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation.达比加群酯不间断治疗在心房颤动消融患者中的可行性与安全性。
Intern Med. 2015;54(10):1167-73. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.54.3520. Epub 2015 May 15.
8
Uninterrupted rivaroxaban vs. uninterrupted vitamin K antagonists for catheter ablation in non-valvular atrial fibrillation.利伐沙班不间断治疗与维生素K拮抗剂不间断治疗用于非瓣膜性心房颤动导管消融的比较
Eur Heart J. 2015 Jul 21;36(28):1805-11. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv177. Epub 2015 May 14.
9
Differences in activated clotting time among uninterrupted anticoagulants during the periprocedural period of atrial fibrillation ablation.心房颤动消融围手术期不同不间断抗凝药物的活化凝血时间差异。
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Sep;12(9):1972-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.04.016. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
10
Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin or dabigatran in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.比较利伐沙班与华法林或达比加群在接受导管消融治疗心房颤动患者中的疗效和安全性的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Aug 15;114(4):577-82. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.038. Epub 2014 Jun 6.

不间断服用达比加群或利伐沙班对心房颤动患者导管消融期间达到肝素反应理想活化凝血时间的影响。

Effect of uninterrupted dabigatran or rivaroxaban on achieving ideal activated clotting time to heparin response during catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation.

作者信息

Xin Qian, Zhang Chuang, Wang Yu-Jia, Li Jian, Chen Tao, Li Shi-Xing, Wang Wei, Yang Yu, Song Wen-Juan, Zhou Jin, Shi Xiang-Min

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, the Sixth Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Department of Health Service, the Eighth Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Geriatr Cardiol. 2022 Aug 28;19(8):565-574. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2022.08.004.

DOI:10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2022.08.004
PMID:36339467
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9630001/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Uninterrupted use of oral anticoagulants before atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation can reduce the incidence of perioperative thromboembolic events. However, the effect of new oral anticoagulants on activated clotting time (ACT) in response to heparin during AF ablation in Chinese populations remains unknown. The aim of the present retrospective study was to investigate the value of ACTs in response to intraoperative heparin administration in patients using dabigatran or rivaroxaban.

METHODS

From January 2018 to December 2021, a total of 173 patients undergoing AF ablation were included in the study, in which 101 patients were treated with dabigatran, 72 patients were treated with rivaroxaban. The intraoperative ACT values were examined in both groups. The incidence of periprocedural complications was evaluated.

RESULTS

Initial heparin dosage (88 ± 19 U/kg 78 ± 27 U/kg, < 0.05), total heparin dosage (137 ± 41 U/kg 106 ± 52 U/kg, < 0.05) during the ablation procedure were higher in the dabigatran group than those in the rivaroxaban group. Mean ACT (280 ± 36 s 265 ± 30 s, < 0.05), and the percentage of ACTs within the therapeutic range (250-350 s) (74% ± 26% 60% ± 29%, < 0.05) were significantly lower in the dabigatran group than those in the rivaroxaban group, particularly in male patients. Furthermore, the average time of achieving the target ACT (250-350 s) was also found longer in the dabigatran group ( < 0.05) as compared with the rivaroxaban group. No significant difference was found in the incidence of periprocedural complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The anticoagulant effect of uninterrupted rivaroxaban therapy appears to be more stable and efficient than dabigatran administration during catheter ablation in patients with AF.

摘要

背景

房颤(AF)消融术前持续使用口服抗凝药可降低围手术期血栓栓塞事件的发生率。然而,新型口服抗凝药对中国人群AF消融术中肝素诱导的活化凝血时间(ACT)的影响尚不清楚。本回顾性研究的目的是探讨使用达比加群或利伐沙班的患者术中ACT对肝素给药的反应价值。

方法

2018年1月至2021年12月,共有173例行AF消融术的患者纳入研究,其中101例接受达比加群治疗,72例接受利伐沙班治疗。检测两组患者术中ACT值,评估围手术期并发症的发生率。

结果

消融术中,达比加群组的初始肝素剂量(88±19 U/kg对78±27 U/kg,P<0.05)、总肝素剂量(137±41 U/kg对106±52 U/kg,P<0.05)高于利伐沙班组。达比加群组的平均ACT(280±36 s对265±30 s,P<0.05)及ACT处于治疗范围(250 - 350 s)的百分比(74%±26%对60%±29%,P<0.05)显著低于利伐沙班组,尤其在男性患者中。此外,达比加群组达到目标ACT(250 - 350 s)的平均时间也比利伐沙班组长(P<0.05)。两组围手术期并发症发生率无显著差异。

结论

在AF患者导管消融术中,持续使用利伐沙班的抗凝效果似乎比达比加群更稳定、更有效。