Wang Chaoqian
School of Physics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116024 China.
School of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116024 China.
Int J Dyn Control. 2022 Oct 28:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s40435-022-01068-3.
We develop a general SIS model to study the epidemic transmission in such semi-closed communities. The community population is divided into susceptible and infected in terms of the infection state, and concerning the physical structure of the crowd, they are classified into mobile and fixed individuals. The mobile individuals can be inside or outside the community, while the fixed individuals can be only inside the community. There are fixed infection sources outside the community, measuring the epidemic severity in society. We attribute the spreading to two reasons: (i) clustered infection among the community population and (ii) the epidemic in society spreading to the community population. We discuss the model in two cases. In the first case, the epidemic spreads in society, such that reasons (i) and (ii) work together. The results show that concerning fixed individuals (e.g. the elderly in nursing homes), a more closed community always promotes the infection. In the second case, there is no epidemic spreading in society, such that only reason (i) works. The results show that restricting all individuals to the community produces equivalent consequences as allowing them going outside the community. We should evenly distribute individuals inside and outside to form isolation. A counterexample is residential universities implementing closed management, where only students are restricted to campus. The model shows such management may lead to severe epidemics, and to prevent the epidemic outbreaks, students should have free access to being on or off campus.
我们开发了一个通用的SIS模型来研究此类半封闭社区中的疫情传播。社区人口根据感染状态分为易感者和感染者,并且考虑到人群的物理结构,他们被分为流动个体和固定个体。流动个体可以在社区内或社区外,而固定个体只能在社区内。社区外存在固定感染源,用以衡量社会中的疫情严重程度。我们将传播归因于两个原因:(i)社区人口中的聚集性感染和(ii)社会中的疫情传播到社区人口。我们分两种情况讨论该模型。在第一种情况下,疫情在社会中传播,使得原因(i)和(ii)共同起作用。结果表明,对于固定个体(例如养老院中的老年人),更封闭的社区总是会促进感染。在第二种情况下,社会中没有疫情传播,使得只有原因(i)起作用。结果表明,将所有个体限制在社区内与允许他们外出会产生相同的后果。我们应该在社区内外均匀分布个体以形成隔离。一个反例是实行封闭管理的寄宿制大学,其中只有学生被限制在校园内。该模型表明这种管理可能会导致严重疫情,为防止疫情爆发,学生应该能够自由进出校园。