• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

台湾地区接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者双联抗血小板治疗降阶梯的真实世界分析

Real-World Analyses of the De-Escalation of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Taiwan.

作者信息

Li Yi-Heng, Hsieh I-Chang, Lin Hui-Wen, Lin Sheng-Hsiang

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan.

出版信息

Acta Cardiol Sin. 2025 Jan;41(1):106-120. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202501_41(1).20240916B.

DOI:10.6515/ACS.202501_41(1).20240916B
PMID:39776925
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11701495/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is the standard treatment for acute myocardial infarction (MI). This study aimed to investigate the use of DAPT and de-escalation after discharge in real-world practice among patients with acute MI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Taiwan.

METHODS

Using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, we included patients who received PCI for acute MI and survived to discharge with DAPT from 2011 to 2021. The choice of different P2Y12 inhibitors at discharge and de-escalation therapy after discharge were analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, 58989 patients (mean age 61.9 ± 13.2 years, male 81.4%) were included. The initial use of aspirin plus ticagrelor (A + T) increased from 4.8% in 2013 to 73.2% in 2021 (p < 0.01). Switch to de-escalation therapy occurred in 52.7% of the A + T users at 9 months follow-up. Aspirin plus clopidogrel (A + C) and ticagrelor monotherapy were the most commonly used de-escalation therapies in the first 6 months. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that older patients and those with non-ST-segment elevation MI, multi-vessel PCI, baseline bleeding risk and bleeding events during follow-up were more likely to receive ticagrelor monotherapy than A + C.

CONCLUSIONS

A + T has become the major initial DAPT for patients with acute MI undergoing PCI in Taiwan, but de-escalation is not uncommon after discharge. Ticagrelor monotherapy was more likely to be prescribed than A + C in those with multi-vessel PCI or bleeding concern.

摘要

背景

双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)是急性心肌梗死(MI)的标准治疗方法。本研究旨在调查台湾接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性MI患者在现实世界中出院后DAPT的使用情况及降阶梯治疗情况。

方法

利用台湾全民健康保险研究数据库,我们纳入了2011年至2021年因急性MI接受PCI并存活至出院且接受DAPT治疗的患者。分析了出院时不同P2Y12抑制剂的选择以及出院后的降阶梯治疗情况。

结果

共纳入58989例患者(平均年龄61.9±13.2岁,男性占81.4%)。阿司匹林加替格瑞洛(A+T)的初始使用率从2013年的4.8%增至2021年的73.2%(p<0.01)。在9个月随访时,52.7%的A+T使用者转为降阶梯治疗。阿司匹林加氯吡格雷(A+C)和替格瑞洛单药治疗是前6个月最常用的降阶梯治疗方法。多变量逻辑回归分析表明,老年患者以及非ST段抬高型MI、多支血管PCI、基线出血风险和随访期间有出血事件的患者比A+C更有可能接受替格瑞洛单药治疗。

结论

在台湾,A+T已成为接受PCI的急性MI患者主要的初始DAPT,但出院后降阶梯治疗并不少见。对于多支血管PCI或有出血顾虑的患者,替格瑞洛单药治疗比A+C更有可能被处方。

相似文献

1
Real-World Analyses of the De-Escalation of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Taiwan.台湾地区接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者双联抗血小板治疗降阶梯的真实世界分析
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2025 Jan;41(1):106-120. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202501_41(1).20240916B.
2
De-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者双联抗血小板治疗的降阶梯治疗:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 May 22;29(3):171-186. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112476.
3
Effectiveness of dual antiplatelet de-escalation therapy on the prognosis of patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.双联抗血小板药物降级疗法对行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者预后的影响。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Mar 29;23(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03152-8.
4
Unguided de-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel in stabilised patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (TALOS-AMI): an investigator-initiated, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised trial.替格瑞洛未指导降级为氯吡格雷在稳定的急性心肌梗死行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者(TALOS-AMI):一项研究者发起的、开放标签、多中心、非劣效性、随机试验。
Lancet. 2021 Oct 9;398(10308):1305-1316. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01445-8.
5
A novel de-escalation antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.一种新型的急性冠状动脉综合征经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的降阶抗血小板治疗。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jul 7;102(27):e34153. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034153.
6
De-Escalation Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Prevail over Potent P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergone Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Network Meta-Analysis.在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,降阶梯双联抗血小板治疗优于强效P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 25;23(11):360. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2311360. eCollection 2022 Nov.
7
Bleeding risk in patients prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy and triple therapy after coronary interventions: the ADAPTT retrospective population-based cohort studies.接受冠状动脉介入治疗后接受双联抗血小板治疗和三联治疗的患者的出血风险:ADAPTT 回顾性基于人群的队列研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2023 May;27(8):1-257. doi: 10.3310/MNJY9014.
8
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy De-Escalation in Stabilized Myocardial Infarction With High Ischemic Risk: Post Hoc Analysis of the TALOS-AMI Randomized Clinical Trial.稳定型心肌梗死伴高缺血风险患者的双联抗血小板治疗降级:TALOS-AMI 随机临床试验的事后分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 Feb 1;9(2):125-133. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.4587.
9
De-escalating Dual Antiplatelet Therapy to Ticagrelor Monotherapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome : A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.急性冠状动脉综合征中双联抗血小板治疗降级为替格瑞洛单药治疗:一项随机临床试验的系统评价和个体患者数据荟萃分析
Ann Intern Med. 2025 Apr;178(4):533-542. doi: 10.7326/ANNALS-24-03102. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
10
Guided and unguided de-escalation from potent P2Y12 inhibitors among patients with acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis.急性冠脉综合征患者中从强效 P2Y12 抑制剂的有指导和无指导降级:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2022 Aug 11;8(5):492-502. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvab068.

本文引用的文献

1
Stopping Aspirin Within 1 Month After Stenting for Ticagrelor Monotherapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome: The T-PASS Randomized Noninferiority Trial.支架置入后 1 个月内停用阿司匹林行替格瑞洛单药治疗急性冠状动脉综合征:T-PASS 随机非劣效性试验。
Circulation. 2024 Feb 20;149(8):562-573. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.066943. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
2
2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes.2023年欧洲心脏病学会急性冠状动脉综合征管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-3826. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191.
3
Short-Term DAPT and DAPT De-Escalation Strategies for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.短期 DAPT 与急性冠状动脉综合征患者的 DAPT 降级策略:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Sep;16(9):e013242. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013242. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
4
Unraveling the Maze of De-Escalation Strategies in Acute Coronary Syndromes.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Sep;16(9):e013461. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013461. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
5
Balancing Benefits and Risks of Oral Antiplatelet Strategies in patients With Coronary Artery Diseases: An Evolving Issue.冠状动脉疾病患者口服抗血小板策略的获益与风险平衡:一个不断发展的问题。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023 Dec;48(12):102025. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.102025. Epub 2023 Aug 6.
6
Defining Strategies of Modulation of Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Consensus Document from the Academic Research Consortium.定义冠心病患者抗血小板治疗的调节策略:来自学术研究联盟的共识文件。
Circulation. 2023 Jun 20;147(25):1933-1944. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.064473. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
7
Evidence-Based Optimal Medical Therapy and Mortality in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性心肌梗死患者的循证最佳药物治疗与死亡率。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 May 16;12(10):e024370. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024370. Epub 2023 May 9.
8
Adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy and 3-year clinical outcome following acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后遵循指南指导的药物治疗及3年临床结局
Eur Heart J Open. 2023 Mar 17;3(2):oead029. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oead029. eCollection 2023 Mar.
9
Comparison of De-escalation of DAPT Intensity or Duration in East Asian and Western Patients with ACS Undergoing PCI: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.东亚和西方经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者的 DAPT 强度或持续时间降级比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Thromb Haemost. 2023 Aug;123(8):773-792. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-57030. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
10
Assessing the Clinical Treatment Dynamics of Antiplatelet Therapy Following Acute Coronary Syndrome and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the US.评估美国急性冠状动脉综合征和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后抗血小板治疗的临床治疗动态。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e238585. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8585.