Tong Ling, George Ben, Crotty Bradley H, Somai Melek, Taylor Bradley W, Osinski Kristen, Luo Jake
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Department of Health Informatics and Administration, United States.
Medical College of Wisconsin, Clinical and Translational Science Institute of Southeastern Wisconsin, Froedtert Hospital, United States.
IPEM Transl. 2022 Nov-Dec;3:100010. doi: 10.1016/j.ipemt.2022.100010. Epub 2022 Oct 30.
Telemedicine has been an essential form of care since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, telemedicine may exacerbate disparities for populations with limited digital literacy or access, such as older adults, racial minorities, patients of low income, rural residences, or limited English proficiency. From March 2020 to March 2022, this retrospective cohort study analyzed the use of in-person, phone/message, and telemedical care at a single tertiary care center in an oncology department. We investigated the association between economic, racial, ethnic, socioeconomic factors and forms of care, including in-person visits, telemedicine-based visits, and telephone/messages. The study results show that telemedicine utilization is lower among patients 65 and older, female patients, American Indian or Alaska Native patients, uninsured patients, and patients who require interpreters during clinical visits. As a result, it is unlikely that telemedicine will provide equal access to clinical care for all populations. On the other hand, in-person care utilization remains low in low-income and rural-living patients compared to the general population, while telephone and message use remains high in low-income and rural-living patients. We conclude that telemedicine is currently unable to close the utilization gap for populations of low socioeconomic status. Patients with low socioeconomic status use in-person care less frequently. For the disadvantaged, unusually high telephone or message utilization is unlikely to provide the same quality as in-person or telemedical care. Understanding the causes of disparity and promoting a solution to improve equal access to care for all patients is critical.
自新冠疫情爆发以来,远程医疗一直是一种重要的医疗形式。然而,远程医疗可能会加剧数字素养有限或获取渠道有限人群的差异,比如老年人、少数族裔、低收入患者、农村居民或英语水平有限的人群。从2020年3月到2022年3月,这项回顾性队列研究分析了一家三级医疗中心肿瘤科面对面诊疗、电话/信息诊疗和远程医疗的使用情况。我们调查了经济、种族、民族、社会经济因素与诊疗形式之间的关联,包括面对面就诊、基于远程医疗的就诊以及电话/信息诊疗。研究结果表明,65岁及以上患者、女性患者、美洲印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民患者、未参保患者以及临床就诊时需要口译员的患者,其远程医疗利用率较低。因此,远程医疗不太可能为所有人群提供平等的临床诊疗机会。另一方面,与普通人群相比,低收入和农村居民患者的面对面诊疗利用率仍然较低,而低收入和农村居民患者的电话和信息使用率仍然较高。我们得出结论,目前远程医疗无法弥合社会经济地位较低人群的利用率差距。社会经济地位较低的患者较少使用面对面诊疗。对于弱势群体而言,异常高的电话或信息使用率不太可能提供与面对面或远程医疗相同的质量。了解差异的原因并推动解决方案以改善所有患者平等获得诊疗的机会至关重要。