Suppr超能文献

合格联邦健康中心扩充后产前保健和生育结果的变化。

Changes in prenatal care and birth outcomes after federally qualified health center expansion.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr;58(2):489-497. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14099. Epub 2022 Nov 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the expansion of Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) improved late prenatal care initiation, low birth weight, and preterm birth among Medicaid-covered or uninsured individuals.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING

We identified all FQHCs in California using the Health Resources and Services Administration's Uniform Data System from 2000 to 2019. We used data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey to describe area characteristics. We measured outcomes in California birth certificate data from 2007 to 2019.

STUDY DESIGN

We compared areas that received their first FQHC between 2011 and 2016 to areas that received it later or that had never had an FQHC. Specifically, we used a synthetic control with a staggered adoption approach to calculate non-parametric estimates of the average treatment effects on the treated areas. The key outcome variables were the rate of Medicaid or uninsured births with late prenatal care initiation (>3 months' gestation), with low birth weight (<2500 grams), or with preterm birth (<37 weeks' gestation).

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: The analysis was limited to births covered by Medicaid or that were uninsured, as indicated on the birth certificate.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The 55 areas in California that received their first FQHC in 2011-2016 were more populous; their residents were more likely to be covered by Medicaid, to be low-income, or to be Hispanic than residents of the 48 areas that did not have an FQHC by the end of the study period. We found no statistically significant impact of the first FQHC on rates of late prenatal care initiation (ATT: -10.4 [95% CI -38.1, 15.0]), low birth weight (ATT: 0.2 [95% CI -7.1, 5.4]), or preterm birth (ATT: -7.0 [95% CI -15.5, 2.3]).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results from California suggest that access to primary and prenatal care may not be enough to improve these outcomes. Future work should evaluate the impact of ongoing initiatives to increase access to maternal health care at FQHCs through targeted workforce investments.

摘要

目的

评估联邦合格医疗中心 (FQHC) 的扩张是否改善了医疗补助或未参保人群的晚期产前护理开始、低出生体重和早产。

数据来源和研究地点

我们使用卫生资源和服务管理局的统一数据系统,从 2000 年到 2019 年确定了加利福尼亚州的所有 FQHC。我们使用美国人口普查的美国社区调查数据来描述地区特征。我们在 2007 年至 2019 年的加利福尼亚州出生证明数据中测量了结果。

研究设计

我们将在 2011 年至 2016 年期间获得第一家 FQHC 的地区与后来获得或从未获得过 FQHC 的地区进行比较。具体来说,我们使用具有交错采用方法的合成对照来计算治疗地区的平均治疗效果的非参数估计值。关键的结果变量是 Medicaid 或未参保出生的晚期产前护理开始率(>3 个月妊娠)、低出生体重(<2500 克)或早产(<37 周妊娠)率。

数据收集/提取方法:分析仅限于出生证明上注明的 Medicaid 覆盖或未参保的分娩。

主要发现

加利福尼亚州的 55 个地区在 2011-2016 年期间获得了第一家 FQHC,人口更多;与研究结束时没有 FQHC 的 48 个地区的居民相比,这些地区的居民更有可能获得 Medicaid 覆盖、收入较低或为西班牙裔。我们没有发现第一家 FQHC 对晚期产前护理开始率(ATT:-10.4[95%CI-38.1,15.0])、低出生体重率(ATT:0.2[95%CI-7.1,5.4])或早产率(ATT:-7.0[95%CI-15.5,2.3])的统计学显著影响。

结论

我们在加利福尼亚州的结果表明,获得初级和产前护理可能不足以改善这些结果。未来的工作应该评估通过有针对性的劳动力投资增加 FQHC 获得产妇保健机会的持续举措的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bd0/10012219/e02910085ee7/HESR-58-489-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验