Scholz Michael P, Donders Jacobus
Psychology Department, Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2024 Jan-Mar;31(2):263-278. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2022.2144617. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
This study explored the relationships between objective measures of cognitive functioning, self and informant reports of cognitive problems in daily life, and depression screening in older adults who had been referred because of reported or suspected cognitive changes. We used archival data from 100, predominantly White (97%), typically educated ( = 13.25 years), older adults ( = 70.38 years) who received an outpatient neuropsychological evaluation. We characterized the cognitive performance using the CVLT-II Total score. We characterized patient and collateral reports using the BRIEF-A MI index, a normed scale of cognitive problems in daily life. We also incorporated a depression screener (PHQ-9) into our analyses. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that only the informant reported problems in daily life, using the BRIEF-A MI index, was a significant predictor of objective cognitive deficits, as defined by CVLT-II Total scores. Self BRIEF-A MI index scores were not significant predictors of CVLT-II Total performance after we accounted for depression using the patient's PHQ-9 score. Additionally, elevated depression widened the discrepancy between raters, with elevated depression associated with worsening sself-report scores compared to informant-reported scores. As informant-reported problems were the strongest predictor of cognitive deficits, we recommend routine collection of collateral informant reports in the neuropsychological evaluation of older adults referred for cognitive concerns. We also recommend incorporating self-ratings of daily life functioning and screening for depression to contextualize patient complaints and address their concerns, even in the absence of objective cognitive dysfunction.
本研究探讨了认知功能的客观测量指标、日常生活中认知问题的自我报告和知情者报告,以及因报告的或疑似的认知变化而被转诊的老年人的抑郁筛查之间的关系。我们使用了来自100名主要为白人(97%)、具有典型教育程度(平均 = 13.25年)、年龄较大(平均 = 70.38岁)的成年人的存档数据,这些人接受了门诊神经心理学评估。我们用加利福尼亚语言学习测验第二版(CVLT-II)总分来描述认知表现。我们用简明症状问卷-成人版(BRIEF-A)的日常功能障碍指数来描述患者和旁证报告,这是一个日常生活中认知问题的标准化量表。我们还将抑郁筛查工具(患者健康问卷-9,PHQ-9)纳入分析。多元线性回归分析显示,只有使用BRIEF-A日常功能障碍指数的知情者报告的日常生活问题,是由CVLT-II总分定义的客观认知缺陷的显著预测因素。在我们用患者的PHQ-9分数对抑郁进行校正后,自我BRIEF-A日常功能障碍指数分数并不是CVLT-II总体表现的显著预测因素。此外,抑郁程度升高会加大评分者之间的差异,抑郁程度升高与自我报告分数相比知情者报告分数恶化有关。由于知情者报告的问题是认知缺陷的最强预测因素,我们建议在对因认知问题而被转诊的老年人进行神经心理学评估时,常规收集旁证知情者报告。我们还建议纳入日常生活功能的自我评分和抑郁筛查,以便将患者的主诉背景化并解决他们的担忧,即使在没有客观认知功能障碍的情况下也是如此。