Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences) & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, 16766 Jingshi Road, Jinan, Shandong, PR China.
Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, PR China.
Eur J Radiol. 2022 Dec;157:110573. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110573. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
Using mono-exponential, bi-exponential, and stretched-exponential models of multi-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to predict tumor depositions (TDs) in patients with rectal cancer (RC).
This retrospective study, between January 2018 and November 2021, enrolled 30 TDs-positive and 38 TDs-negative of patients with rectal cancer. The mathematical parameters including ADC from mono-exponential model, D, D* and f from bi-exponential model, and DDC and α from stretched-exponential model, clinical factors (such as age, gender, pathological stage, etc.) and image features (such as length, thickness, location, etc.) from tumor characteristics were obtained to identify the two groups of patients. The results were evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis and area under the ROC curve (AUC). Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the independent risk factors.
The D* and α values, pt. stage, tumor location, mesorecta fascia (MRF) / peritoneum status and percentage of rectal wall circumference invaded (PCI) were significantly different between the TDs-positive and TDs-negative groups (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.029, P = 0.008, P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively), with the AUC were 0.838, 0.901, 0.618, 0.698 0.694 and 0.758, respectively. The D* and α values were proved to be independent risk factors after multivariate binary logistic regression analysis (p = 0.022 and 0.004, respectively). The AUC of the model consisting of the D* and α values was 0.913 (95 % CI 0.820 ∼ 0.968).The combined model constructed by D*, α and tumor location demonstrated superior diagnostic performance, with the AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 0.947 (95 % confidence interval, CI, 0.865-0.987), 0.900, 0.868 and 0.853, respectively.
Multiple mathematical parameters can be used as preoperative auxiliary diagnostic tools to predict TDs of RC. The combined model constructed by D*, α and tumor location show better diagnostic performance for TDs.
使用单指数、双指数和拉伸指数模型对多 b 值扩散加权成像(DWI)进行分析,以预测直肠癌(RC)患者的肿瘤沉积(TDs)。
本回顾性研究于 2018 年 1 月至 2021 年 11 月间纳入 30 例 TDs 阳性和 38 例 TDs 阴性的 RC 患者。获得了来自单指数模型的 ADC、来自双指数模型的 D、D*和 f、来自拉伸指数模型的 DDC 和α,以及来自肿瘤特征的临床因素(如年龄、性别、病理分期等)和图像特征(如长度、厚度、位置等)等数学参数,用于鉴别两组患者。结果通过受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析和 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)进行评估。采用多变量二项逻辑回归分析确定独立的危险因素。
TDs 阳性和 TDs 阴性组间 D和α值、pt. 分期、肿瘤位置、中直肠筋膜(MRF)/腹膜状态以及直肠壁周长受侵百分比(PCI)差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001、P<0.001、P=0.029、P=0.008、P<0.001 和 P=0.002),其 AUC 分别为 0.838、0.901、0.618、0.698、0.694 和 0.758。多变量二项逻辑回归分析证实 D和α值为独立危险因素(p=0.022 和 0.004)。由 D和α值组成的模型的 AUC 为 0.913(95%CI 0.820~0.968)。由 D、α和肿瘤位置构建的联合模型具有更优的诊断效能,其 AUC、敏感度、特异度和准确率分别为 0.947(95%置信区间,CI,0.865-0.987)、0.900、0.868 和 0.853。
多个数学参数可用作 RC 术前辅助诊断工具,以预测 TDs。由 D*、α和肿瘤位置构建的联合模型在预测 TDs 方面具有更好的诊断性能。