Research and Innovation Group, Groupe Hospitalier Ambroise Paré-Hartmann, 25-27 boulevard Victor Hugo, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.
Research and Innovation Group, Groupe Hospitalier Ambroise Paré-Hartmann, 25-27 boulevard Victor Hugo, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.
J Clin Anesth. 2023 Feb;84:110991. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110991. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
To compare a low-tidal-volume with positive end-expiratory pressure strategy (VENT strategy) to a resting-lung-strategy (i.e., no-ventilation (noV) strategy) during cardiopulmonary bypass for coronary artery bypass graft surgery on the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications.
Post-hoc analysis of the MECANO trial which was a prospective single-center, blind, randomized, parallel-group controlled trial.
Tertiary care cardiac surgery center.
Patients who underwent isolated on-pump coronary bypass surgery were randomized either to VENT or noV group.
During the cardiopulmonary bypass phase of the cardiac surgery procedure, mechanical ventilation in the VENT group consisted of a tidal volume of 3 mL/kg, a respiratory rate of 5 per minute and a positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cmHO. Patients in the noV group received no ventilation during this phase.
Primary composite outcome combining death, early respiratory failure, ventilation support beyond day 2 and reintubation.
In this post-hoc analysis, we retained 725 patients who underwent isolated CABG surgery, from the 1501 patients included in the original study. There were 352 in the VENT group and 373 patients in the noV group. Post-hoc comparison yielded no differences in baseline characteristics between these two groups. The primary outcome occurred less frequently in the VENT group than in the noV group, with 44 (12.5%) and 76 (20.4%) respectively (odds-ratio (OR) = 0.56 (0.37-0.84), p = 0.004). There were fewer early respiratory dysfunctions and prolonged respiratory support in the VENT group (respectively, OR = 0.34 (0.12-0.96) p = 0.033 and OR = 0.51 (0.27-0.94) p = 0.029). Complications related to mechanical ventilation were similar in the two groups.
In this post-hoc analysis, maintaining low-tidal ventilation compared to a resting-lung strategy was associated with fewer pulmonary postoperative complications in patients who underwent isolated CABG procedures.
比较低潮气量加呼气末正压通气策略(VENT 策略)与肺休息策略(即无通气(noV)策略)在体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)中对术后肺部并发症发生率的影响。
对 ME-CANO 试验进行了事后分析,该试验是一项前瞻性、单中心、盲法、随机、平行组对照试验。
三级心脏外科中心。
接受单纯体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者被随机分为 VENT 组或 noV 组。
在心脏手术的体外循环阶段,VENT 组的机械通气采用 3ml/kg 的潮气量、5 次/分钟的呼吸频率和 5cmH2O 的呼气末正压。在此阶段,noV 组患者不接受通气。
主要复合终点为死亡、早期呼吸衰竭、第 2 天以后的通气支持和再插管。
在这项事后分析中,我们保留了来自原始研究的 1501 例患者中的 725 例接受单纯 CABG 手术的患者。VENT 组 352 例,noV 组 373 例。事后比较发现,两组患者的基线特征无差异。VENT 组的主要结局发生率低于 noV 组,分别为 44 例(12.5%)和 76 例(20.4%)(比值比(OR)为 0.56(0.37-0.84),p=0.004)。VENT 组早期呼吸功能障碍和延长呼吸支持的患者较少(分别为 OR=0.34(0.12-0.96),p=0.033 和 OR=0.51(0.27-0.94),p=0.029)。两组机械通气相关并发症相似。
在这项事后分析中,与肺休息策略相比,维持低潮气量通气与接受单纯 CABG 手术患者的术后肺部并发症减少相关。