• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者导航在初级保健中进行护理计划的可行性。

Feasibility of Patient Navigation for Care Planning in Primary Care.

机构信息

Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.

University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.

出版信息

J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319221134754. doi: 10.1177/21501319221134754.

DOI:10.1177/21501319221134754
PMID:36348571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9647277/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To help better control chronic conditions we need to address root causes of poor health like unhealthy behaviors, mental health, and social needs. However, addressing these needs in primary care is difficult. One solution may be connecting patients with a navigator for support creating a personal care goal.

METHODS

As part of an RCT to evaluate a feasible approach to care planning, 24 clinicians from 12 practices in the Virginia Ambulatory Care Outcomes Research Network (ACORN) and 87 intervention patients with uncontrolled chronic conditions participated in a care planning intervention. We had a structured process to guide patients, train navigators, and adapt the navigation process to meet the needs of each practice.

RESULTS

Only 1 practice had bandwidth for staff to serve as a patient navigator, even for extra pay. For the other 11 practices, a research team member needed to provide navigation services. On average, patients wanted 25 weeks of support to complete care plans. The average time patients needed to speak with navigators on the phone was 7 min and 3 s. In exit interviews, patients consistently shared how motivational it was to have a caring person check in on them, offer help, and hold them accountable.

CONCLUSION

Patient navigation to address care plans should be feasible. The time commitment is minimal. It does not require intensive training, and primary care is already doing much of this work. Yet, given the burden and competing demands in primary care, this help cannot be offered without additional resources.

摘要

目的

为了更好地控制慢性病,我们需要解决健康不良的根本原因,如不健康的行为、心理健康和社会需求。然而,在基层医疗中解决这些需求很困难。一种解决方案可能是为患者配备一名导航员,以支持他们制定个人护理目标。

方法

作为评估可行的护理计划方法的 RCT 的一部分,来自弗吉尼亚州门诊护理结果研究网络(ACORN)的 12 个实践中的 24 名临床医生和 87 名患有未控制的慢性疾病的干预患者参与了护理计划干预。我们有一个结构化的流程来指导患者、培训导航员,并调整导航流程以满足每个实践的需求。

结果

只有 1 个实践有足够的带宽让员工担任患者导航员,即使是额外付费。对于其他 11 个实践,需要研究团队成员提供导航服务。平均而言,患者需要 25 周的支持才能完成护理计划。患者与导航员通过电话沟通的平均时间为 7 分钟 3 秒。在离职访谈中,患者一致表示,有一个关心他们的人检查他们的进展、提供帮助并对他们负责,这是非常有动力的。

结论

为解决护理计划提供患者导航是可行的。所需的时间投入很少。它不需要密集的培训,而且基层医疗已经在做很多这样的工作。然而,考虑到基层医疗的负担和竞争需求,如果没有额外的资源,就无法提供这种帮助。

相似文献

1
Feasibility of Patient Navigation for Care Planning in Primary Care.患者导航在初级保健中进行护理计划的可行性。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319221134754. doi: 10.1177/21501319221134754.
2
Enhanced care planning and clinical-community linkages versus usual care to address basic needs of patients with multiple chronic conditions: a clinician-level randomized controlled trial.强化护理计划和临床-社区联系以满足多种慢性病患者的基本需求与常规护理相比:一项临床医生层面的随机对照试验。
Trials. 2020 Jun 11;21(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04463-3.
3
Bridging the postpartum gap: best practices for training of obstetrical patient navigators.填补产后空白:培训产科患者导航员的最佳实践。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug;225(2):138-152. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.03.038. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
4
Patient Navigators Connecting Patients to Community Resources to Improve Diabetes Outcomes.患者导航员将患者与社区资源相连接以改善糖尿病治疗效果。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Jan-Feb;29(1):78-89. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.01.150048.
5
Intensity and Variation of Health Navigator Support: Addressing Medical and Social Needs of Diabetes Patients in East Oakland.健康导航员支持的强度和变化:满足东奥克兰糖尿病患者的医疗和社会需求。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Jul;39(9):1616-1624. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08590-w. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Training cancer caregiver navigators: experiences from implementing the eSNAP and caregiver navigator intervention.培训癌症照护者导航员:实施 eSNAP 和照护者导航干预的经验。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Dec;30(12):10263-10272. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07394-8. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
8
A qualitative process evaluation of a diabetes navigation program embedded in an endocrine specialty center in rural Appalachian Ohio.对俄亥俄州阿巴拉契亚农村地区一家内分泌专科中心实施的糖尿病导航项目进行的定性过程评估。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2018 Jul 27;18(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12902-018-0278-7.
9
Patient navigators' reflections on the navigator-patient relationship.患者导航员对导航员与患者关系的思考。
J Cancer Educ. 2014 Jun;29(2):337-44. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0612-3.
10
Development of a patient-oriented navigation model for patients with lung cancer and stroke in Germany.德国面向肺癌和中风患者的患者导向导航模型的开发。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 16;22(1):785. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08063-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Enhanced care planning and clinical-community linkages versus usual care to address basic needs of patients with multiple chronic conditions: a clinician-level randomized controlled trial.强化护理计划和临床-社区联系以满足多种慢性病患者的基本需求与常规护理相比:一项临床医生层面的随机对照试验。
Trials. 2020 Jun 11;21(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04463-3.
2
A Personalized Care Plan Is Positively Associated With Better Clinical Outcomes in the Care of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Real-Life Study.个性化护理计划与 2 型糖尿病患者护理的更好临床结局呈正相关:一项横断面真实世界研究。
Can J Diabetes. 2020 Mar;44(2):133-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2019.05.003. Epub 2019 May 15.
3
Designing a valid randomized pragmatic primary care implementation trial: the my own health report (MOHR) project.设计一项有效的随机实用化初级保健实施试验:我的健康报告(MOHR)项目。
Implement Sci. 2013 Jun 25;8:73. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-73.
4
Implementing practical interventions to support chronic illness self-management.实施切实可行的干预措施以支持慢性病自我管理。
Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003 Nov;29(11):563-74. doi: 10.1016/s1549-3741(03)29067-5.