Division of Clinical Sciences, ICMR-National AIDS Research Institute, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Division of Epidemiology, ICMR-National AIDS Research Institute, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Indian J Med Res. 2022 May-Jun;155(5&6):461-471. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_1095_22.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic had a distinct impact on scientific research and Ethics Committees (ECs). We conducted a mixed-methods investigation to understand the issues faced and solutions identified by ECs during this pandemic in India.
A quantitative online survey form (30 members) and qualitative in-depth interviews (10 members) from various ECs were conducted. Thematic content analysis for qualitative and proportion analysis for quantitative data was carried out.
During the online survey, an average difficulty score, which was measured using the Visual Analogue Scale, was 5.3 (SD 2.1). Pressure for expedited approvals was felt by EC members with a drastic increase in the number of submission of research projects. The scarcity of information on investigational products (IPs) and requisite consent process posed major hurdles. Ongoing non-COVID studies and post-graduate dissertations were badly hit due to the shift in attention towards COVID-related research. Non-familiarity with virtual technology and lack of face-to-face interactions were highlighted as demerits. However, a few of the EC members welcomed newer methods, being time-saving, convenient and reducing travel hassles. Site monitoring and severe adverse event-related analyses were also negatively impacted upon. Solutions included the alternate methods of consenting (virtual, abbreviated), a detailed explanation of the protocol and IPs and benefits versus risk assessment.
INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: Despite various challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the ECs in India steered well through the hurdles. Moreover, adapting a hybrid mode, technical training and updating guidelines were perceived as urgent by EC members.
COVID-19 大流行对科学研究和伦理委员会(EC)产生了明显影响。我们进行了一项混合方法研究,以了解印度在大流行期间 EC 面临的问题和确定的解决方案。
对来自不同 EC 的 30 名成员进行了定量在线调查表格和 10 名成员的定性深入访谈。对定性数据进行了主题内容分析,对定量数据进行了比例分析。
在在线调查中,使用视觉模拟量表测量的平均难度得分为 5.3(SD 2.1)。EC 成员感受到加快审批的压力,研究项目提交数量急剧增加。关于研究产品(IP)的信息稀缺,以及必需的同意程序构成了主要障碍。由于对 COVID 相关研究的关注转移,正在进行的非 COVID 研究和研究生论文受到严重影响。不熟悉虚拟技术和缺乏面对面互动被认为是缺点。然而,一些 EC 成员欢迎更新的方法,因为这些方法节省时间、方便且减少旅行麻烦。现场监测和严重不良事件相关分析也受到负面影响。解决方案包括替代同意方法(虚拟、简化)、详细解释方案和 IP 以及收益与风险评估。
尽管 COVID-19 大流行带来了各种挑战,但印度的 EC 成功地克服了这些障碍。此外,EC 成员认为采用混合模式、技术培训和更新指南是紧迫的。