• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 COVID-19 大流行期间采用虚拟方式:在针对有心血管疾病风险的非裔美国成年人的社区参与式研究中,对一项混合方法饮食行为研究进行调整。

Going virtual during the COVID-19 pandemic: adaptation of a mixed-methods dietary behavior study within a community-based participatory research study of African-American adults at risk for cardiovascular disease.

机构信息

Translational Biobehavioral and Health Disparities Branch, National Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Social Determinants of Obesity and Cardiovascular Risk Laboratory, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Dec 22;22(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01806-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12874-022-01806-3
PMID:36550396
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9773576/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Identifying mechanisms to maintain CBPR studies during an infectious disease pandemic is vital. The current paper describes the changes in methods and processes conducted within a CBPR mixed-methods study to a virtual setting during the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.

METHOD

The DC Community Organizing for Optimal Culinary Knowledge study with Heart (DC COOKS with Heart) was designed to assess the feasibility of a dietary behavior intervention among African-American adults that are at risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). The study is under the umbrella of an ongoing CBPR study and community advisory board that facilitates community involvement in study design and promotes ongoing engagement with community members and leaders. The study population for D.C. COOKS with Heart consists of adult African-American individuals who live in two low-resource neighborhoods in Washington, D.C., which were impacted disproportionately by COVID. Eligible study participants who previously participated in the DC CHOC community-based studies were contacted to participate in Phase 1. The quantitative part of the mixed-methods included survey data collection.

RESULTS

Due to the pandemic, the mode of data collection for surveys changed from self-administered face-to-face to internet-based. All virtual study procedures were conducted between March and April, 2021. Anticipated benefits of the virtual setting included participant safety during the pandemic, ease of logistics for participants. Anticipated challenges included administration of electronic devices to participants, research team training, and potential threats to established trust related to the privacy and confidentiality of participants.

CONCLUSION

The transition to a virtual setting for study procedures in a mixed-methods study was conducted successfully in terms of recruitment, retention of participants, and training of research team members. The virtual transition required established and ongoing engagement through the community advisory board and CBPR practices, institutional support through virtual research policies, collaborations with information technology-based teams, and equipment administration for the study.

TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT04305431 . Registered on March 12, 2020.

摘要

背景

在传染病大流行期间,确定维持 CBPR 研究的机制至关重要。本文描述了在新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行期间,一项 CBPR 混合方法研究将方法和流程转变为虚拟环境所进行的改变。

方法

DC 社区组织促进最佳烹饪知识与心脏研究(DC COOKS with Heart)旨在评估针对心血管疾病(CVD)风险的非裔美国成年人进行饮食行为干预的可行性。该研究是在一个正在进行的 CBPR 研究和社区咨询委员会的保护伞下进行的,该委员会促进社区参与研究设计,并促进与社区成员和领导人的持续互动。DC COOKS with Heart 的研究人群由居住在华盛顿特区两个资源匮乏社区的成年非裔美国人组成,这些社区受到 COVID 的不成比例的影响。之前参加过 DC CHOC 社区研究的合格研究参与者被联系参加第 1 阶段。混合方法的定量部分包括调查数据收集。

结果

由于大流行,调查数据收集的方式从面对面的自我管理转变为基于互联网的方式。所有虚拟研究程序均于 2021 年 3 月至 4 月进行。虚拟环境的预期好处包括参与者在大流行期间的安全,参与者后勤工作的便利性。预期的挑战包括向参与者提供电子设备,研究团队培训以及与参与者的隐私和机密性相关的既定信任受到威胁。

结论

在混合方法研究中,成功地将研究程序转变为虚拟环境,在招募、保留参与者和培训研究团队成员方面取得了成功。虚拟过渡需要通过社区咨询委员会和 CBPR 实践进行既定和持续的参与,通过虚拟研究政策提供机构支持,与信息技术团队合作,以及为研究提供设备管理。

试验注册

NCT04305431。于 2020 年 3 月 12 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2db/9773576/7d1a5c5b5ca3/12874_2022_1806_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2db/9773576/7d1a5c5b5ca3/12874_2022_1806_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2db/9773576/7d1a5c5b5ca3/12874_2022_1806_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Going virtual during the COVID-19 pandemic: adaptation of a mixed-methods dietary behavior study within a community-based participatory research study of African-American adults at risk for cardiovascular disease.在 COVID-19 大流行期间采用虚拟方式:在针对有心血管疾病风险的非裔美国成年人的社区参与式研究中,对一项混合方法饮食行为研究进行调整。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Dec 22;22(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01806-3.
2
Mobilizing faith-based COVID-19 health ambassadors to address COVID-19 health disparities among African American older adults in under-resourced communities: A hybrid, community-based participatory intervention.动员信仰为基础的 COVID-19 健康大使,以解决资源匮乏社区中非洲裔美国老年人的 COVID-19 健康差距:一项混合的、以社区为基础的参与性干预。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 15;19(2):e0285963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285963. eCollection 2024.
3
The GoodNEWS (Genes, Nutrition, Exercise, Wellness, and Spiritual Growth) Trial: a community-based participatory research (CBPR) trial with African-American church congregations for reducing cardiovascular disease risk factors--recruitment, measurement, and randomization.GoodNEWS(基因、营养、锻炼、健康和精神成长)试验:一项基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)试验,针对非裔美国教堂会众,旨在降低心血管疾病风险因素——招募、测量和随机化。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 Sep;32(5):630-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.05.017. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
4
H.U.B city steps: methods and early findings from a community-based participatory research trial to reduce blood pressure among African Americans.H.U.B 城市步骤:一项基于社区的参与式研究试验,旨在降低非裔美国人的血压,方法和早期发现。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Jun 10;8:59. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-59.
5
Community Engagement to Optimize the Use of Web-Based and Wearable Technology in a Cardiovascular Health and Needs Assessment Study: A Mixed Methods Approach.社区参与优化基于网络和可穿戴技术在心血管健康和需求评估研究中的应用:混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Apr 25;4(2):e38. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4489.
6
A community feasibility study of a cooking behavior intervention in African-American adults at risk for cardiovascular disease: DC COOKS (DC Community Organizing for Optimal culinary Knowledge Study) with Heart.一项针对有心血管疾病风险的非裔美国成年人烹饪行为干预的社区可行性研究:“华盛顿特区烹饪”(华盛顿特区社区组织优化烹饪知识研究)与心脏研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Oct 19;6:158. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00697-9. eCollection 2020.
7
Effective Recruitment Strategies Utilized to Examine Dietary Practices of Blacks in New York City in the Midst of the COVID-19 Pandemic.在新冠疫情期间用于调查纽约市黑人饮食习惯的有效招募策略。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Apr;11(2):764-772. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01559-9. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
8
Assessing Food Access, Exercise, and Dietary History among Older African American Parishioners During the COVID-19 Pandemic (C-FED Study): Design, Opportunities, Challenges, and Lessons Learned.评估 COVID-19 大流行期间老年非裔美国教区居民的食物获取、运动和饮食史(C-FED 研究):设计、机遇、挑战和经验教训。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Aug;11(4):1857-1868. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01657-8. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
9
Building and Sustaining a Community Advisory Board of African American Older Adults as the Foundation for Volunteer Research Recruitment and Retention in Health Sciences.构建和维护非裔美国老年社区顾问委员会作为健康科学领域志愿者招募和保留的基础。
Ethn Dis. 2020 Nov 19;30(Suppl 2):755-764. doi: 10.18865/ed.30.S2.755. eCollection 2020.
10
The Community is the Cure: How African American Washington, DC Residents Informed Opioid Treatment Engagement.社区就是治愈的良药:非裔美国华盛顿特区居民如何参与阿片类药物治疗
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2024;18(2):235-245.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the Best Practices for Engagement in Remote Participatory Design: Mixed Methods Analysis of 4 Remote Studies With Family Caregivers.探究远程参与式设计中的最佳实践:对四项与家庭照顾者开展的远程研究的混合方法分析
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 3;26:e60353. doi: 10.2196/60353.
2
Challenges and Approaches to Recruitment for and Retention in a Dyad-Focused eHealth Intervention During COVID-19: Randomized Controlled Trial.COVID-19期间以二元组为重点的电子健康干预措施的招募与留存面临的挑战及应对方法:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 3;26:e51877. doi: 10.2196/51877.
3
Assessing Acceptability: The Role of Understanding Participant, Neighborhood, and Community Contextual Factors in Designing a Community-Tailored Cooking Intervention.

本文引用的文献

1
Conducting Virtual Focus Groups During the COVID-19 Epidemic Utilizing Videoconferencing Technology: A Feasibility Study.在新冠疫情期间利用视频会议技术开展虚拟焦点小组:一项可行性研究
Cureus. 2022 Mar 27;14(3):e23540. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23540. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Revising Recruitment for Focus Groups to Meet Shifting Needs During COVID-19.修订新冠肺炎疫情期间焦点小组的招募以满足不断变化的需求
Nurs Res. 2022;71(2):158-163. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000563.
3
Conducting Qualitative Interviews using Virtual Communication Tools amid COVID-19 Pandemic: A Learning Opportunity for Future Research.
评估可接受性:在设计社区定制烹饪干预措施时,了解参与者、社区和社区背景因素的作用。
Nutrients. 2024 Feb 5;16(3):463. doi: 10.3390/nu16030463.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用虚拟沟通工具进行定性访谈:未来研究的学习机会。
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2020 Dec 31;58(232):1103-1106. doi: 10.31729/jnma.5738.
4
Pivoting a Community-Based Participatory Research Project for Mental Health and Immigrant Youth in Philadelphia During COVID-19.在 COVID-19 期间,为费城的心理健康和移民青年的社区参与式研究项目进行调整。
Health Promot Pract. 2022 Jan;23(1):32-34. doi: 10.1177/15248399211033311. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
5
A community feasibility study of a cooking behavior intervention in African-American adults at risk for cardiovascular disease: DC COOKS (DC Community Organizing for Optimal culinary Knowledge Study) with Heart.一项针对有心血管疾病风险的非裔美国成年人烹饪行为干预的社区可行性研究:“华盛顿特区烹饪”(华盛顿特区社区组织优化烹饪知识研究)与心脏研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Oct 19;6:158. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00697-9. eCollection 2020.
6
Implementation of virtual focus groups for qualitative data collection in a global pandemic.在全球大流行期间实施虚拟焦点小组进行定性数据收集
Am J Surg. 2021 May;221(5):918-922. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.10.009. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
7
COVID-19: Growing Health Disparity Gaps and an Opportunity for Health Behavior Discovery?2019冠状病毒病:日益扩大的健康差距以及健康行为发现的契机?
Health Equity. 2020 Jul 10;4(1):316-319. doi: 10.1089/heq.2020.0026. eCollection 2020.
8
Success in Long-Standing Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Partnerships: A Scoping Literature Review.长期社区参与式研究(CBPR)伙伴关系的成功:范围文献综述。
Health Educ Behav. 2020 Aug;47(4):556-568. doi: 10.1177/1090198119882989. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
9
Household Cooking Frequency of Dinner Among Non-Hispanic Black Adults is Associated with Income and Employment, Perceived Diet Quality and Varied Objective Diet Quality, HEI (Healthy Eating Index): NHANES Analysis 2007-2010.非西班牙裔黑人社群成年人晚餐家庭烹饪频率与收入和就业、感知饮食质量和多样化客观饮食质量、健康饮食指数(HEI)相关:NHANES 分析 2007-2010 年。
Nutrients. 2019 Sep 2;11(9):2057. doi: 10.3390/nu11092057.
10
Community Engagement in the Development of an mHealth-Enabled Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Health Intervention (Step It Up): Pilot Focus Group Study.社区参与基于移动健康技术的身体活动与心血管健康干预项目(“行动起来”)的开发:焦点小组试点研究
JMIR Form Res. 2019 Jan 4;3(1):e10944. doi: 10.2196/10944.