Suppr超能文献

评估回肠贮袋肛管吻合术的功能:是时候扩大我们的 ARM-amentarium 了。

Evaluating lleal Pouch Anal Anastomosis Function: Time to Expand Our ARM-amentarium.

机构信息

Dr. Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2023 Nov 2;29(11):1819-1825. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izac234.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) for medically refractory ulcerative colitis or dysplasia may be associated with structural and inflammatory complications. However, even in their absence, defecatory symptoms secondary to dyssynergic defecation or fecal incontinence may occur. Although anorectal manometry is well established as the diagnostic test of choice for defecatory symptoms, its utility in the assessment of patients with IPAA is less established. In this systematic review, we critically evaluate the existing evidence for anopouch manometry (APM).

METHODS

A total of 393 studies were identified, of which 6 studies met all inclusion criteria. Studies were not pooled given different modalities of testing with varying outcome measures.

RESULTS

Overall, less than 10% of symptomatic patients post-IPAA were referred to APM. The prevalence of dyssynergic defecation as defined by the Rome IV criteria in symptomatic patients with IPAA ranged from 47.0% to 100%. Fecal incontinence in patients with IPAA was characterized by decreased mean and maximal resting anal pressure on APM, as well as pouch hyposensitivity. The recto-anal inhibitory reflex was absent in most patients with and without incontinence.

CONCLUSION

Manometry alone is an imperfect assessment of pouch function in patients with defecatory symptoms, and confirmatory testing may need to be performed with dynamic imaging.

摘要

背景

对于药物难治性溃疡性结肠炎或异型增生,全直肠结肠切除加回肠袋肛管吻合术(IPAA)可能与结构和炎症并发症相关。然而,即使没有这些并发症,由于协同性排便障碍或粪便失禁引起的排便症状也可能发生。尽管直肠肛门测压术是诊断排便症状的首选诊断测试,但在评估 IPAA 患者中的应用尚未得到充分证实。在本系统评价中,我们批判性地评估了肛袋测压术(APM)的现有证据。

方法

共确定了 393 项研究,其中 6 项研究符合所有纳入标准。由于测试方式不同,且存在不同的结果测量方法,因此未进行汇总分析。

结果

总体而言,不到 10%的 IPAA 术后有症状的患者被转诊行 APM。根据罗马 IV 标准,在有症状的 IPAA 患者中,协同性排便障碍的患病率为 47.0%至 100%。IPAA 患者的粪便失禁表现为 APM 上平均和最大静息肛门压力降低,以及袋内感觉减退。大多数有或没有失禁的患者的直肠肛门抑制反射均缺失。

结论

单独的测压术是对有排便症状的患者的袋功能进行的不完美评估,可能需要进行动态成像的确认性测试。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Opioid-Associated Anorectal Dysfunction in Chronic Constipation.慢性便秘中阿片类药物相关的肛门直肠功能障碍
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Aug;67(8):3904-3910. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07288-5. Epub 2021 Oct 26.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验