Department of Radiology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA.
Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Northwell Health, 270-05 76th Avenue, New Hyde Park, NY, 10040, USA.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2023 Jun;30(3):1235-1245. doi: 10.1007/s12350-022-03133-y. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
We investigated quantitative Tc-pyrophosphate (PYP) SPECT/CT reproducibility and accuracy for diagnosing cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR), and whether SPECT/CT improved visual and quantitative results compared to SPECT-only.
Data were reviewed for 318 patients with suspected ATTR who underwent PYP SPECT/CT. Myocardial-to-blood pool count (MBP) ratios were computed and repeated independently > 1 month later. A physician independently scored LV myocardial-to-rib uptake on SPECT/CT as: 0 (negative), 1 < rib (equivocal), 2 = rib (positive) or 3 > rib (positive), and the image quality as: 1 (poor), 2 (adequate), and 3 (good). SPECT-only MBP ratios and visual scores were assessed separately for a subgroup of the first sequential 191 patients.
25% of patients had positive myocardial uptake (myocardial-to-rib uptake score of ≥ 2). SPECT/CT MBP ratios were reproducible (1.35 ± .68 vs 1.33 ± .74, p = .09) and corresponded with visual scores ≥ 2 (ROC AUC = 99 ± 1%) more accurately than SPECT-only MBPs (93 ± 3%, p = .02). SPECT/CT image quality was better than that of SPECT-only (2.7 ± .5 vs 2.1 ± .5, p < .0001) with fewer equivocal results (2.6% vs 22.5%, p < .0001).
SPECT/CT produces MBP ratios that are reproducible and accurately identify a positive scan, with better image quality and fewer equivocal cases than SPECT-only.
我们研究了定量 Tc-焦磷酸盐(PYP)SPECT/CT 诊断心脏转甲状腺素淀粉样变性(ATTR)的可重复性和准确性,以及 SPECT/CT 是否比 SPECT 更能提高视觉和定量结果。
对 318 例疑似 ATTR 患者进行 PYP SPECT/CT 检查,回顾性分析了这些患者的数据。计算心肌与血池计数(MBP)比值,并在 1 个月后再次独立测量。一位医生独立对 SPECT/CT 的 LV 心肌与肋骨摄取进行评分:0(阴性)、1<肋骨(不确定)、2=肋骨(阳性)或 3>肋骨(阳性),图像质量为:1(差)、2(适当)和 3(好)。对于前 191 例连续患者的亚组,分别评估 SPECT 仅 MBP 比值和视觉评分。
25%的患者有阳性心肌摄取(心肌与肋骨摄取评分≥2)。SPECT/CT MBP 比值具有可重复性(1.35±0.68 与 1.33±0.74,p=0.09),与视觉评分≥2(ROC AUC 为 99%±1%)的相关性比 SPECT 仅 MBP 更准确(93%±3%,p=0.02)。SPECT/CT 图像质量优于 SPECT 仅(2.7±0.5 与 2.1±0.5,p<0.0001),不确定结果更少(2.6%与 22.5%,p<0.0001)。
SPECT/CT 产生的 MBP 比值具有可重复性,可准确识别阳性扫描,图像质量更好,不确定病例更少,优于 SPECT 仅。