Anker Daniela, Cullati Stéphane, Rod Naja Hulvej, Chiolero Arnaud, Carmeli Cristian
Population Health Laboratory (#PopHealthLab), University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Department of Readaptation and Geriatrics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Nov 2;20:101282. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101282. eCollection 2022 Dec.
The tracking of educational gradients in mortality across generations could create a long shadow of social inequality, but it remains understudied. We aimed to assess whether intergenerational educational trajectories shape inequalities in early premature mortality from chronic diseases. The study included 544 743 participants of the Swiss National Cohort, a registry population-based study. Individuals were born 1971-1980 and aged 10-19 at the start of the study (1990). Mortality follow-up was until 2018. Educational trajectories were High-High (reference), High-Low, Low-High, Low-Low, corresponding to the sequence of parental-individual attained education. Examined deaths were related to cardiovascular diseases (CVD), cancers, and substance use. Sex-specific inequalities in mortality were quantified via standardized cumulative risk differences/ratios between age 20 and 45. We triangulated findings with a negative outcome control. For women, inequalities were negligible. For men, while inequalities in cancers deaths were negligible, inequalities in CVD mortality were associated to low individual education regardless of parental education. Excess CVD deaths for Low-High were negligible while High-Low provided 234 (95% confidence intervals: 100 to 391) and Low-Low 185 (115 to 251) additional CVD deaths per 100 000 men compared to High-High. That corresponded to risk ratios of 2.7 (1.6 to 4.5) and 2.3 (1.6 to 3.4), respectively. Gradients in substance use mortality were observed only when education changed across parent-offspring. Excess substance use deaths for Low-Low were negligible while High-Low provided 225 (88 to 341) additional and Low-High 80 (23 to 151) fewer substance use deaths per 100 000 men compared to High-High. That corresponded to risk ratios of 1.8 (1.3 to 2.5) and 0.7 (0.5 to 0.9), respectively. Inequalities in premature mortality were driven by individual education and by parental education for some chronic diseases. This could justify the development of intergenerational prevention strategies.
几代人之间死亡率的教育梯度追踪可能会造成社会不平等的长期阴影,但这方面的研究仍然不足。我们旨在评估代际教育轨迹是否会影响慢性病导致的过早死亡率不平等。该研究纳入了瑞士国民队列的544743名参与者,这是一项基于登记处人群的研究。个体出生于1971年至1980年,在研究开始时(1990年)年龄为10至19岁。死亡率随访至2018年。教育轨迹分为高-高(参照组)、高-低、低-高、低-低,分别对应父母-个体获得教育的顺序。所研究的死亡与心血管疾病(CVD)、癌症和物质使用有关。通过20岁至45岁之间的标准化累积风险差异/比率对性别特异性死亡率不平等进行量化。我们使用负面结果对照对研究结果进行了三角验证。对于女性,不平等可以忽略不计。对于男性,虽然癌症死亡的不平等可以忽略不计,但无论父母教育程度如何,CVD死亡率的不平等都与个体教育程度低有关。低-高组的CVD额外死亡可忽略不计,而与高-高组相比,高-低组每10万名男性中有234例(95%置信区间:100至391)额外的CVD死亡,低-低组有185例(115至251)。这分别对应风险比为2.7(1.6至4.5)和2.3(1.6至3.4)。仅当父母与子女之间的教育发生变化时,才观察到物质使用死亡率的梯度。与高-高组相比,低-低组的物质使用额外死亡可忽略不计,而高-低组每10万名男性中有225例(88至341)额外的物质使用死亡,低-高组则少80例(23至151)。这分别对应风险比为1.8(1.3至2.5)和0.7(0.5至0.9)。过早死亡率的不平等是由个体教育以及某些慢性病的父母教育程度驱动的。这可以为制定代际预防策略提供依据。