Luo Jun, Wu Deping, Li Zhimin, Xie Dongjing, Huang Jiacheng, Song Jiaxing, Luo Weidong, Liu Shuai, Li Fengli, Zi Wenjie, Huang Qiaojuan, Luo Jiefeng, Kong Deyan
Department of Neurology, Sichuan Mianyang 404 Hospital, Mianyang, China.
Department of Neurology, Xinqiao Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Front Neurol. 2022 Oct 24;13:992396. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.992396. eCollection 2022.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rescue therapy, a therapy in which rescue devices such as balloon angioplasty, Apollo stent, Wingspan stent, Solitaire stent, or other self-expanding stents are used after the failure of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) and to determine the most effective rescue measure for acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) after the failure of MT.
For this study, we recruited patients from the BASILAR registry. All participants were divided into three groups: the recanalized with rescue therapy group, the recanalized without rescue therapy group, and the non-recanalized group. Clinical outcomes at 90 days and 1 year were compared. The association of rescue measures with favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score of 0-3) in patients achieving successful recanalization rescue therapy was estimated using multivariate logistic regression analyses.
Among the participants, recanalization failure was found in 112 patients and successful recanalization in 473 patients, with 218 patients receiving rescue therapy and 255 patients without rescue therapy. Of these, 111 (43.5%) patients in the recanalized without rescue therapy group, 65 (29.8%) patients in the recanalized with rescue therapy group, and nine (8.0%) patients in the non-recanalized group achieved favorable outcomes at 90 days. Both the recanalization with rescue therapy and the recanalization without rescue therapy groups were associated with favorable outcomes at 90 days and 1 year compared with the non-recanalized group. Moreover, in patients receiving rescue therapy, Wingspan stents, Apollo stents, and balloon angioplasty were associated with higher rates of favorable outcomes at 90 days and 1 year than Solitaire stents.
Whether rescue therapy is administered or not, recanalization leads to favorable outcomes in patients with acute BAO. For acute BAO after MT failure, balloon angioplasty, Wingspan stenting, and Apollo stenting could be considered effective and safe rescue options but not Solitaire stenting.
本研究旨在评估补救治疗的有效性和安全性,补救治疗是在机械取栓(MT)失败后使用球囊血管成形术、阿波罗支架、Wingspan支架、Solitaire支架或其他自膨式支架等补救装置的一种治疗方法,并确定MT失败后急性基底动脉闭塞(BAO)最有效的补救措施。
在本研究中,我们从基底动脉登记处招募患者。所有参与者分为三组:接受补救治疗后再通组、未接受补救治疗而再通组和未再通组。比较90天和1年时的临床结局。使用多因素逻辑回归分析评估补救措施与成功再通(接受补救治疗)患者良好结局(改良Rankin量表[mRS]评分为0 - 3)之间的关联。
在参与者中,112例患者再通失败,47例患者成功再通,其中218例患者接受了补救治疗,而255例患者未接受补救治疗。其中,未接受补救治疗而再通组中的患者有111例(43.5%)、接受补救治疗后再通组中的患者有65例(29.8%)、未再通组中的患者有9例(8.0%)在90天时达到良好结局。与未再通组相比,接受补救治疗后再通组和未接受补救治疗而再通组在90天和1年时均与良好结局相关。此外,在接受补救治疗的患者中,Wingspan支架、阿波罗支架和球囊血管成形术在90天和1年时与良好结局的发生率高于Solitaire支架。
无论是否进行补救治疗,再通都能使急性BAO患者获得良好结局。对于MT失败后的急性BAO,球囊血管成形术、Wingspan支架置入术和阿波罗支架置入术可被视为有效且安全的补救选择,但Solitaire支架置入术并非如此。