• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

埃塞俄比亚迪雷和莱格达迪流域基于苹果的农林业用地适宜性分析:对生态系统服务的影响

Analysis of land suitability for apple-based agroforestry farming in Dire and Legedadi watersheds of Ethiopia: implication for ecosystem services.

作者信息

Admasu Simeneh, Desta Hayal, Yeshitela Kumelachew, Argaw Mekuria

机构信息

Ethiopian Institute of Architecture, Building Construction and City Development, Ethiopia.

GFA Consulting Group, Biodiversity and Forests Programme in Ethiopia, Ethiopia.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2022 Oct 22;8(11):e11217. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11217. eCollection 2022 Nov.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11217
PMID:36353178
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9637651/
Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate land suitability for apple farming in the Dire and Legedadi watersheds of the central highlands of Ethiopia. Attributes that determine apple growth were categorized into environmental, soil, climate, and land management factors. The land evaluation methodology developed by FAO (1976) was applied in six steps. First, nine thematic layers are prepared. Second, pair-wise comparison matrices were performed using AHP. Third, thematic layers are reclassified. Forth, weights are assigned to each class. Fifth, weighted overlay analysis was performed to produce a land suitability map. Finally, the land suitability map was classified into high, moderate, marginally suitable, and unsuitable categories. Soil type received the highest weight of 1.98 followed by elevation and LULC of 1.51 each. The mean temperature, rainfall, soil pH, and soil drainage weight were 1.41, 0.94, 0.56, and 0.52 respectively. Whereas the slope and aspect weighted the lowest at 0.38 and 0.19 respectively. Out of the total area of the watersheds, about 14 km (6.7%) and 12.34 km (13.1%) are highly suitable for apple farming in the Legedadi and Dire watersheds respectively. Whereas, about 113.35 km (53.8%) and 42.54 km (45.2%) of land are not suitable in the Legedadi and Dire watersheds respectively. Landholders who play a pivotal role should be incentivized to grow perennial crops (e.g., apple-trees) to enhance environmental income and alleviate poverty.

摘要

本研究旨在评估埃塞俄比亚中部高地迪雷和莱格达迪流域种植苹果的土地适宜性。决定苹果生长的属性被分为环境、土壤、气候和土地管理因素。粮农组织(1976年)制定的土地评价方法分六个步骤应用。首先,准备九个专题图层。其次,使用层次分析法进行成对比较矩阵分析。第三,对专题图层进行重新分类。第四,为每个类别赋予权重。第五,进行加权叠加分析以生成土地适宜性地图。最后,将土地适宜性地图分为高度适宜、中度适宜、勉强适宜和不适宜四类。土壤类型的权重最高,为1.98,其次是海拔和土地利用与土地覆盖,权重均为1.51。平均温度、降雨量、土壤pH值和土壤排水的权重分别为1.41、0.94、0.56和0.52。而坡度和坡向的权重最低,分别为0.38和0.19。在流域总面积中,莱格达迪流域约14平方公里(6.7%)和迪雷流域约12.34平方公里(13.1%)的土地非常适合种植苹果。而在莱格达迪流域和迪雷流域,分别有大约113.35平方公里(53.8%)和42.54平方公里(45.2%)的土地不适宜种植。应激励发挥关键作用的土地所有者种植多年生作物(如苹果树),以增加环境收入并减轻贫困。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bd/9637651/753720678b3b/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bd/9637651/21264857b773/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bd/9637651/cf7d8a82a616/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bd/9637651/ebe1ffd894ff/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bd/9637651/cfa3b39e9541/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bd/9637651/753720678b3b/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bd/9637651/21264857b773/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bd/9637651/cf7d8a82a616/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bd/9637651/ebe1ffd894ff/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bd/9637651/cfa3b39e9541/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05bd/9637651/753720678b3b/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of land suitability for apple-based agroforestry farming in Dire and Legedadi watersheds of Ethiopia: implication for ecosystem services.埃塞俄比亚迪雷和莱格达迪流域基于苹果的农林业用地适宜性分析:对生态系统服务的影响
Heliyon. 2022 Oct 22;8(11):e11217. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11217. eCollection 2022 Nov.
2
Impact of land use land cover changes on ecosystem service values in the Dire and Legedadi watersheds, central highlands of Ethiopia: Implication for landscape management decision making.埃塞俄比亚中部高地迪雷和莱盖达迪流域土地利用土地覆盖变化对生态系统服务价值的影响:对景观管理决策的启示
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 10;9(4):e15352. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15352. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
Enhancing Coffee Agroforestry Systems Suitability Using Geospatial Analysis and Sentinel Satellite Data in Gedeo Zone, Ethiopia.利用地理空间分析和哨兵卫星数据提高埃塞俄比亚格代奥地区咖啡农林业系统的适宜性
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Sep 28;24(19):6287. doi: 10.3390/s24196287.
4
Combination of fuzzy-AHP and GIS techniques in land suitability assessment for wheat () cultivation.模糊层次分析法与地理信息系统技术相结合在小麦种植土地适宜性评价中的应用
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2022 Apr;29(4):2634-2644. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.12.050. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
5
Application of geospatial technology on land suitability analysis for wheat and maize farming: In a case of Guder sub-watershed North West Oromia, Ethiopia.地理空间技术在小麦和玉米种植土地适宜性分析中的应用:以埃塞俄比亚奥罗米亚西北部古德次流域为例。
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 27;10(13):e33557. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33557. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
6
Modeling of land suitability for surface irrigation using analytical hierarchy process method in Belessa Districts, northwestern Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西北部贝莱萨地区采用层次分析法对地面灌溉土地适宜性进行建模
Heliyon. 2023 Feb 28;9(3):e13937. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13937. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
Geographic information system-assisted site quality assessment for hazelnut cultivation using multi-criteria decision analysis in the Black Sea region, Turkey.利用多准则决策分析在土耳其黑海地区进行地理信息系统辅助的榛子种植场地质量评估
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(24):35908-35933. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18127-5. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
8
Mapping environmental land use conflict potentials and ecosystem services in agricultural watersheds.绘制农业流域环境土地利用冲突潜力和生态系统服务图。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jul 15;630:827-838. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.176. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
9
Assessment of land suitability using a soil-indicator-based approach in a geomatics environment.基于土壤指标的地理空间环境土地适宜性评估。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 27;12(1):18113. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22727-7.
10
Geo environmental green growth towards sustainable development in semi-arid regions using physicochemical and geospatial approaches.运用物理化学和地理空间方法实现半干旱地区可持续发展的地理环境绿色增长。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Sep;31(41):54089-54106. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24588-z. Epub 2022 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Ecosystem-based management approaches for watershed conservation and geosustainability.基于生态系统的流域保护和地球可持续性管理方法。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 16;10(9):e29800. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29800. eCollection 2024 May 15.
2
Impact of land use land cover changes on ecosystem service values in the Dire and Legedadi watersheds, central highlands of Ethiopia: Implication for landscape management decision making.埃塞俄比亚中部高地迪雷和莱盖达迪流域土地利用土地覆盖变化对生态系统服务价值的影响:对景观管理决策的启示
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 10;9(4):e15352. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15352. eCollection 2023 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of land use land cover changes on ecosystem service values in the Dire and Legedadi watersheds, central highlands of Ethiopia: Implication for landscape management decision making.埃塞俄比亚中部高地迪雷和莱盖达迪流域土地利用土地覆盖变化对生态系统服务价值的影响:对景观管理决策的启示
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 10;9(4):e15352. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15352. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Soil type is the primary determinant of the composition of the total and active bacterial communities in arable soils.土壤类型是耕地土壤中总细菌群落和活性细菌群落组成的主要决定因素。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Mar;69(3):1800-9. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.3.1800-1809.2003.
3
Agroforestry practices, runoff, and nutrient loss: a paired watershed comparison.
农林业实践、径流与养分流失:流域配对比较
J Environ Qual. 2002 Jul-Aug;31(4):1214-25. doi: 10.2134/jeq2002.1214.