• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重度创伤性脑损伤中生命维持治疗的撤除或 withholding 的特征:一项日本单机构研究。 注:这里“withholding”直译为“ withholding”,结合语境可能更合适的表述是“不予实施”等,但按要求不添加解释,保留原文英文表述。

The Characteristics of Withdrawal or Withholding of Life-Sustaining Treatment in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Single Japanese Institutional Study.

作者信息

Tanizaki Shinsuke, Toma Yasuo, Miyashita Katsuyoshi, Maeda Shigenobu

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui, Japan.

Department of Neurosurgery, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui, Japan.

出版信息

World Neurosurg X. 2022 Oct 4;17:100144. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2022.100144. eCollection 2023 Jan.

DOI:10.1016/j.wnsx.2022.100144
PMID:36353247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9637969/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

There is little evidence on the factors influencing the decision to withdraw or continue life-sustaining treatment in the setting of severe traumatic brain injury in Japanese institutions. We investigated the factors associated with the withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining treatment (WLST) for severe traumatic brain injury at a single Japanese institution.

METHODS

A total of 161 patients with severe traumatic brain injury were retrospectively reviewed. Patient characteristics and injury types were compared between patients with and without the WLST.

RESULTS

Of the 161 patients, 87 (54%) died and 52 (32%) decided to undergo WLST. In 98% of the WLST cases, the decision was made within 24 h of admission. The mean duration between WLST and death was 2 days. The predicted probabilities for mortality and unfavorable outcomes were highest in patients with WLST within 24 h. Patients with WLST were older and had a higher frequency of falls on the ground, ischemic heart disease, and acute subdural hemorrhage than those without WLST.

CONCLUSIONS

The decisions of almost all WLST cases were made within 24 h of admission for severe traumatic brain injury in a Japanese institution because of Japanese patients' religious and cultural backgrounds.

摘要

目的

在日本医疗机构中,关于影响重度创伤性脑损伤患者维持生命治疗撤减或继续决策的因素,相关证据较少。我们调查了日本一家机构中重度创伤性脑损伤患者维持生命治疗撤减或 withhold(此处可能有误,推测是withholding,暂按“撤减或停止”翻译)(WLST)的相关因素。

方法

对161例重度创伤性脑损伤患者进行回顾性研究。比较了接受和未接受WLST患者的患者特征及损伤类型。

结果

161例患者中,87例(54%)死亡,52例(32%)决定接受WLST。在98%的WLST病例中,决策在入院24小时内做出。WLST至死亡的平均时长为2天。入院24小时内接受WLST的患者死亡率和不良结局的预测概率最高。接受WLST的患者比未接受WLST的患者年龄更大,摔倒在地、患有缺血性心脏病和急性硬膜下出血的频率更高。

结论

由于日本患者的宗教和文化背景,在日本一家机构中,几乎所有重度创伤性脑损伤患者的WLST决策都是在入院24小时内做出的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc73/9637969/7fb37a041489/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc73/9637969/19c5799e2eac/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc73/9637969/9367af8a05ed/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc73/9637969/7fb37a041489/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc73/9637969/19c5799e2eac/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc73/9637969/9367af8a05ed/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc73/9637969/7fb37a041489/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
The Characteristics of Withdrawal or Withholding of Life-Sustaining Treatment in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Single Japanese Institutional Study.重度创伤性脑损伤中生命维持治疗的撤除或 withholding 的特征:一项日本单机构研究。 注:这里“withholding”直译为“ withholding”,结合语境可能更合适的表述是“不予实施”等,但按要求不添加解释,保留原文英文表述。
World Neurosurg X. 2022 Oct 4;17:100144. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2022.100144. eCollection 2023 Jan.
2
Examining the independent risk factors for withdrawal of life sustaining treatment in trauma patients.探讨创伤患者停止生命支持治疗的独立风险因素。
Injury. 2023 Dec;54(12):111088. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111088. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
3
Factors Affecting Neurosurgeons' Decisions to Forgo Life-Sustaining Treatments After Traumatic Brain Injury.影响颅脑创伤后神经外科医生放弃生命维持治疗决策的因素。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Mar;159:e311-e323. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.056. Epub 2021 Dec 18.
4
Predictors for Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Therapies in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective Trauma Quality Improvement Program Database Study.创伤性脑损伤患者停止生命支持治疗的预测因素:一项回顾性创伤质量改进计划数据库研究。
Neurosurgery. 2022 Aug 1;91(2):e45-e50. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002020. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
5
Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Therapies in Children With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.儿童严重创伤性脑损伤患者的生命支持治疗撤停。
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Jul;40(13-14):1388-1401. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0321. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
6
Recovery Potential in Patients Who Died After Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment: A TRACK-TBI Propensity Score Analysis.撤停生命支持治疗后死亡患者的康复潜力:TRACK-TBI 倾向评分分析。
J Neurotrauma. 2024 Oct;41(19-20):2336-2348. doi: 10.1089/neu.2024.0014. Epub 2024 May 13.
7
Influence of health insurance on withdrawal of life sustaining treatment for patients with isolated traumatic brain injury: a retrospective multi-center observational cohort study.医疗保险对单纯性创伤性脑损伤患者停止生命维持治疗的影响:一项回顾性多中心观察性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2024 Jul 18;28(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05027-6.
8
Clinical outcomes and end-of-life treatment in 596 patients with isolated traumatic brain injury: a retrospective comparison of two Dutch level-I trauma centers.596 例单纯性创伤性脑损伤患者的临床结局和临终治疗:两个荷兰一级创伤中心的回顾性比较。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Aug;50(4):1249-1259. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02407-5. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
9
Withdrawal of Life-supporting Treatment in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.严重创伤性脑损伤患者的生命支持治疗的撤离。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Aug 1;155(8):723-731. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1790.
10
Novel application of latent class analysis to outcome assessment in traumatic brain injury with multiple injury subtypes or poly-TBI.潜在类别分析在具有多种损伤亚型的创伤性脑损伤或多发性创伤性脑损伤结局评估中的新应用。
J Neurosurg. 2024 Sep 6;142(2):561-568. doi: 10.3171/2024.5.JNS232842. Print 2025 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical outcomes and end-of-life treatment in 596 patients with isolated traumatic brain injury: a retrospective comparison of two Dutch level-I trauma centers.596 例单纯性创伤性脑损伤患者的临床结局和临终治疗:两个荷兰一级创伤中心的回顾性比较。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Aug;50(4):1249-1259. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02407-5. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
2
Prevalence, reasons, and timing of decisions to withhold/withdraw life-sustaining therapy for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.体外心肺复苏治疗院外心脏骤停患者时,决定 withholding/withdraw 生命支持治疗的流行率、原因和时机。
Crit Care. 2023 Jun 27;27(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04534-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Occurrence and timing of withdrawal of life-sustaining measures in traumatic brain injury patients: a CENTER-TBI study.创伤性脑损伤患者生命支持措施的撤停时间和发生情况:CENTER-TBI 研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Oct;47(10):1115-1129. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06484-1. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
2
The Influence of Geography, Religion, Religiosity and Institutional Factors on Worldwide End-of-Life Care for the Critically Ill: The WELPICUS Study.地理、宗教、宗教信仰和制度因素对全球危重病患者临终关怀的影响:WELPICUS 研究。
J Palliat Care. 2024 Oct;39(4):316-324. doi: 10.1177/08258597211002308. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
3
Factors with the strongest prognostic value associated with in-hospital mortality rate among patients operated for acute subdural and epidural hematoma.
与急性硬膜下和硬膜外血肿手术患者院内死亡率相关的具有最强预后价值的因素。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Oct;47(5):1517-1525. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01460-8. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
4
Withdrawal of Life-supporting Treatment in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.严重创伤性脑损伤患者的生命支持治疗的撤离。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Aug 1;155(8):723-731. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1790.
5
Risk Factors for Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.重度创伤性脑损伤患者停止维持生命治疗的危险因素
Am Surg. 2020 Jan 1;86(1):8-14.
6
Outcome in Patients with Isolated Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.孤立性中重度创伤性脑损伤患者的预后
Crit Care Res Pract. 2018 Sep 23;2018:3769418. doi: 10.1155/2018/3769418. eCollection 2018.
7
Patient factors and outcomes associated with the withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining therapies in mechanically ventilated brain-injured patients: An observational multicentre study.机械通气脑损伤患者撤停生命支持治疗的相关患者因素和结局:一项观察性多中心研究。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Jul;35(7):511-518. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000783.
8
Craniotomy Versus Decompressive Craniectomy for Acute Subdural Hematoma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.开颅手术与急性硬膜下血肿减压性颅骨切除术:系统评价与荟萃分析
World Neurosurg. 2017 May;101:677-685.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.024. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
9
Dynamic axes of informed consent in Japan.日本知情同意的动态轴。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Feb;174:159-168. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.031. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
10
Uncertainty, conflict and consent: revisiting the futility debate in neurotrauma.不确定性、冲突与同意:重新审视神经创伤中的无效治疗辩论
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 Jul;158(7):1251-7. doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-2818-0. Epub 2016 May 3.