Kim Jaymelee, Elgerud Lucia, Tuller Hugh
Justice Sciences, University of Findlay, Findlay, OH, USA.
Anthropology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Forensic Sci Res. 2022 Feb 10;7(3):346-357. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2021.2002524. eCollection 2022.
As forensic humanitarian and forensic human rights anthropology has continued to evolve, an ongoing concern in the field is meaningful engagement with survivors and the imperative to do no harm. For forensic anthropologists attempting to engage in grassroots forensic intervention, unaffiliated with an international investigation, means for effectively accessing and engaging communities has not been widely discussed. Here, forensic anthropologists draw on multiple, cross-cultural contexts to discuss methods and techniques for introducing forensic partnerships to communities. To do this, the scientist must consider their positionality as well as that of the stakeholders, develop effective local relationships, and consider a community-grounded approach. This paper argues that drawing on broader cultural anthropological training, ultimately informs one's ability to gain entry into at-risk and vulnerable communities while minimizing harm. To illustrate this point, examples are drawn from Canada, Uganda, Cyprus, and Somaliland.
随着法医人道主义和法医人权人类学的不断发展,该领域一直关注的问题是如何与幸存者进行有意义的接触以及避免造成伤害的必要性。对于试图参与基层法医干预的法医人类学家来说,在未参与国际调查的情况下,有效接触和融入社区的方法尚未得到广泛讨论。在此,法医人类学家借鉴多种跨文化背景,探讨将法医合作引入社区的方法和技巧。为此,科学家必须考虑自身以及利益相关者的立场,建立有效的当地关系,并考虑以社区为基础的方法。本文认为,借鉴更广泛的文化人类学训练,最终有助于提高进入高危和脆弱社区的能力,同时将伤害降至最低。为说明这一点,文中列举了来自加拿大、乌干达、塞浦路斯和索马里兰的例子。