Zitek Tony, Koneri Nicholas, Georges Nikkitta, Slane Matthew
Department of Emergency Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami, Florida, USA.
Department of Critical Care and Emergency Medicine, The Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine at Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA.
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2022 Jul-Sep;15(3):135-138. doi: 10.4103/jets.jets_49_22. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
Two common ways of providing anesthesia for shoulder dislocation reductions in the emergency department (ED) are intra-articular lidocaine (IAL) injections and procedural sedation (PS). We sought to compare PS with propofol or etomidate to IAL for shoulder dislocation reductions in the ED.
This was an open-label, randomized controlled trial of patients aged 18-70 years with anterior shoulder dislocations who presented to a single ED. We randomized patients to either PS or IAL for their shoulder dislocation reduction. The primary outcome measure was ED length of stay (LOS). Secondarily, we assessed patient satisfaction and the number of attempts required for successful reduction.
We identified 60 patients who met the criteria for enrollment, and were able to enroll 43. We randomized 23 patients to IAL and 20 to PS. In the IAL group, the mean ED LOS was 133 min as compared to 124 min for the PS group (difference 9 min [95% confidence interval (CI)-22-41], = 0.54). Patients in the IAL group required an average of 1.9 reduction attempts as compared to 1.2 in the PS group (difference of 0.7 [95% CI 0.2-1.2]). The mean patient satisfaction scores were similar at 9.7 and 9.8 for the IAL and PS groups, respectively.
This study lacked a sufficient sample size to detect small differences but found no statistically significant difference in mean ED LOS or patient satisfaction for patients who received IAL as compared to PS. Patients in the PS group required fewer attempts for successful reduction.
在急诊科(ED)为肩关节脱位复位提供麻醉的两种常见方法是关节内注射利多卡因(IAL)和程序镇静(PS)。我们试图比较在急诊科使用丙泊酚或依托咪酯进行程序镇静与关节内注射利多卡因用于肩关节脱位复位的效果。
这是一项开放标签、随机对照试验,研究对象为年龄在18至70岁之间、因前肩关节脱位就诊于单一急诊科的患者。我们将患者随机分为程序镇静组或关节内注射利多卡因组进行肩关节脱位复位。主要结局指标是急诊科住院时间(LOS)。其次,我们评估了患者满意度以及成功复位所需的尝试次数。
我们确定了60名符合入组标准的患者,最终成功入组43名。我们将23名患者随机分配至关节内注射利多卡因组,20名患者随机分配至程序镇静组。关节内注射利多卡因组的平均急诊科住院时间为133分钟,而程序镇静组为124分钟(差异为9分钟[95%置信区间(CI)-22至41],P = 0.54)。关节内注射利多卡因组患者平均需要1.9次复位尝试,而程序镇静组为1.2次(差异为0.7[95%CI 0.2至1.2])。关节内注射利多卡因组和程序镇静组的平均患者满意度评分相似,分别为9.7和9.8。
本研究样本量不足,无法检测到微小差异,但发现与程序镇静相比,接受关节内注射利多卡因的患者在急诊科平均住院时间或患者满意度方面无统计学显著差异。程序镇静组患者成功复位所需的尝试次数更少。