Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Center (WTZ), 45147 Essen, Germany.
Children's Hospital, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
Curr Oncol. 2022 Oct 30;29(11):8222-8234. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29110649.
Despite an intensive multimodal treatment approach, approximately 50% of high-risk (HR) neuroblastoma (NB) patients experience progression. Despite the advances in targeted therapy, high-dose chemotherapy, and other systemic treatment options, radiation therapy (RT) to sites of relapsed disease can be an option to reduce tumor burden and improve chance for disease control.
Patients who received salvage irradiation with proton beam therapy (PBT) for local or metastatic relapse of HR NB within the prospective registry trials KiProReg and ProReg were eligible for this retrospective analysis. Data on patient characteristics, multimodality therapy, adverse events, and oncologic endpoints were evaluated. Adverse events were assessed before, during, and after PBT according to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) V4.0.
Between September 2013 and September 2020, twenty (11 male; 9 female) consecutive patients experiencing local ( = 9) or distant recurrence ( = 25) were identified for this analysis. Distant recurrences included osteomedullary ( = 11) or CNS lesions ( = 14). Salvage therapy consisted of re-induction chemo- or chemo-immuno-therapy ( = 19), surgery ( = 6), high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation ( = 13), radiation ( = 20), and concurrent systemic therapy. Systemic therapy concurrent to RT was given to six patients and included temozolomide ( = 4), carboplatine ( = 1), or anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKI) ( = 1). A median dose of 36 Gy was applied to the 34 recurrent sites. Local RT was applied to 15 patients, while five patients, received craniospinal irradiation for CNS relapse. After a median follow-up (FU) of 20 months (4-66), the estimated rate for local control, distant metastatic free survival, and overall survival at 3 years was 68.0%, 37.9%, and 61.6%, respectively. During RT, ten patients (50%) presented with a higher-grade acute hematologic adverse event. Late higher-grade sequelae included transient myelitis with transverse section ( = 2) and secondary malignancy outside of the RT field ( = 1).
Our study demonstrates the efficacy and safety of RT/PBT for recurrent HR NB in a multimodality second-line approach. To better define the role of RT for these patients, prospective studies would be desirable.
尽管采用了强化的多模式治疗方法,仍有约 50%的高危(HR)神经母细胞瘤(NB)患者出现进展。尽管靶向治疗、大剂量化疗和其他全身治疗选择取得了进展,但针对复发病灶的放射治疗(RT)仍是一种降低肿瘤负担、提高疾病控制机会的选择。
在 KiProReg 和 ProReg 的前瞻性注册试验中,符合条件的是在该研究中接受质子束治疗(PBT)进行局部或转移性 HR NB 复发的患者。评估了患者特征、多模式治疗、不良事件和肿瘤学终点的数据。根据常见不良事件术语标准(CTCAE)V4.0,在 PBT 之前、期间和之后评估不良事件。
在 2013 年 9 月至 2020 年 9 月期间,连续确定了 20 名(男性 11 名,女性 9 名)接受局部(=9)或远处复发(=25)的 HR NB 患者进行了这项分析。远处复发包括骨髓(=11)或中枢神经系统(CNS)病变(=14)。挽救性治疗包括再诱导化疗或化疗免疫治疗(=19)、手术(=6)、大剂量化疗和干细胞移植(=13)、放疗(=20)和同时进行的全身治疗。有 6 名患者同时接受了全身治疗,包括替莫唑胺(=4)、卡铂(=1)或间变性淋巴瘤激酶酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(ALK-TKI)(=1)。34 个复发病灶的中位剂量为 36Gy。15 名患者接受局部放疗,5 名患者因 CNS 复发接受全脑全脊髓放疗。中位随访(FU)时间为 20 个月(4-66)后,3 年局部控制率、远处无转移生存率和总生存率分别为 68.0%、37.9%和 61.6%。在 RT 期间,10 名患者(50%)出现较高等级的急性血液学不良事件。晚期较高等级后遗症包括横贯性脊髓炎(=2)和放疗野外的继发性恶性肿瘤(=1)。
我们的研究表明,在多模式二线治疗中,RT/PBT 对复发性 HR NB 是有效且安全的。为了更好地确定 RT 对这些患者的作用,需要进行前瞻性研究。