Department of Health Professions, School of Nursing and Health Professions, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
WHO Collaborating Centre for Governance, Accountability and Transparency in the Pharmaceutical Sector, Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Glob Health Action. 2022 Dec 31;15(1):2140494. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2140494.
Whistleblowing can bring suspected wrongdoing to the attention of someone who is in the position to rectify the problem. Whistleblowing research can help improve effectiveness of anti-corruption efforts in the health sector.
The objective of this scoping review is to understand the extent and type of evidence on whistleblowing as an anti-corruption strategy in health and pharmaceutical organisations in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
This scoping review searched the PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases from 2005 to 2020, limited to English language. We also searched websites of multilateral agencies or international non-governmental organisations for policy documents, guidance and reports. Titles and abstracts were screened to remove those where the focus was not on health, pharmaceuticals, whistleblowing, or LMIC context. Articles focused on research misconduct were excluded. Full-text articles were assessed for eligibility on these same criteria. Included sources were analysed thematically, based on five categories including definitions and models; evidence of reporting frequency; factors influencing whistleblowing; cultural context; and outcomes.
The review found 22 sources including reports, policies, and guidance documents (12, 55%), news articles (4, 18%), policy analyses/reviews (3, 14%), commentaries (2, 9%), and empirical studies (1, 5%). Most sources described whistleblowing policy and system components such as how whistleblowing is defined, who can report, and how confidentiality is assured. Few articles documented types and frequencies of corruption identified through whistleblowing or factors associated with whistleblowing. Several studies mentioned cultural norms as a potential limitation to whistleblowing effectiveness. About one-third of the sources described fear of retaliation and noted the need to strengthen protection for whistleblowers.
Research on whistleblowing is scarce in health and pharmaceutical organisations in LMICs. Documentation of policies, factors associated with whistleblowing, and whistleblowing outcomes is needed and could help countries to mainstream whistleblowing as a sectoral anti-corruption strategy.
举报可以将涉嫌违规行为提请有权纠正问题的人注意。举报研究有助于提高卫生部门反腐败工作的成效。
本范围综述的目的是了解在中低收入国家(LMIC)的卫生和制药组织中,举报作为反腐败策略的证据的范围和类型。
本范围综述从 2005 年至 2020 年在 PubMed、Scopus 和 EMBASE 数据库中进行检索,仅限于英语。我们还在多边机构或国际非政府组织的网站上搜索政策文件、指南和报告,以获取有关卫生、制药、举报和 LMIC 背景的信息。筛选标题和摘要,以去除重点不是卫生、制药、举报或 LMIC 背景的文章。排除专门研究研究不端行为的文章。根据相同的标准,对全文文章进行了资格评估。纳入的来源根据五个类别进行了主题分析,包括定义和模型;举报频率的证据;影响举报的因素;文化背景;以及结果。
综述共发现 22 个来源,包括报告、政策和指导文件(12 个,55%)、新闻文章(4 个,18%)、政策分析/评论(3 个,14%)、评论(2 个,9%)和实证研究(1 个,5%)。大多数来源描述了举报政策和系统组成部分,例如举报的定义、谁可以举报以及如何确保机密性。很少有文章记录通过举报发现的腐败类型和频率,或与举报相关的因素。有几项研究提到了文化规范可能是举报有效性的一个限制因素。大约三分之一的来源描述了对报复的恐惧,并指出需要加强对举报人的保护。
在 LMIC 的卫生和制药组织中,举报方面的研究很少。需要记录政策、与举报相关的因素以及举报结果,这有助于各国将举报作为部门反腐败战略的主流。