• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线杂货购物中的公平促进策略:低收入家庭提供的建议。

Equity-Promoting Strategies in Online Grocery Shopping: Recommendations Provided by Households of Low Income.

机构信息

Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY.

Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

J Nutr Educ Behav. 2022 Nov;54(11):998-1010. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2022.08.007.

DOI:10.1016/j.jneb.2022.08.007
PMID:36357044
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore barriers and facilitators of online grocery shopping and identify community-driven strategies to promote equity in online food access.

DESIGN

This qualitative study used a purposive recruitment strategy to conduct 11 focus groups and 5 in-depth interviews between November 2020 and March 2021.

SETTING

Data collection was conducted virtually with participants residing in diverse (majority urban) regions of Maryland.

PARICIPANTS

44 primary household food purchasers with young children (aged < 8 years) eligible for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

PHENOMENON OF INTEREST

Barriers and facilitators of online grocery shopping and strategies elicited by the community to leverage SNAP and online food retailer services to reduce inequities in healthy food access.

ANALYSIS

We coded and analyzed transcripts on the basis of the Socioecological Model, Theory of Planned Behavior, and an Equity-Oriented Framework.

RESULTS

Overall, we identified 10 themes across all socioecological levels, all of which reflected both barriers and facilitators to online shopping: (1) individual: trust of shoppers, technology, (2) interpersonal: spousal/children needs, (3) community: safety and security, (4) organizational: retail experience and food quality, and (5) policy: SNAP and structural inequities. Participant recommendations included improving food access and communication with hired shoppers, implementing more payment/cost-saving options, and offering educational programming for SNAP participants on using benefits online.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Households of low-income identified barriers and facilitators of online grocery shopping across the socioecological levels, emphasizing the need for a multilevel approach to equity promotion. We recommend future work to explore the suggested actionable pathways, which involve delivery providers, grocery stores, nutrition educators, and policymakers leveraging online grocery features (ie, meal planning support) and policies (ie, expansion of the SNAP Online Purchasing Pilot to more retailers) to reducing deterrents (ie, delivery fees waived) for an equity-promoting online grocery environment.

摘要

目的

探索在线杂货购物的障碍和促进因素,并确定社区驱动的策略,以促进在线食品获取的公平性。

设计

这项定性研究采用了有针对性的招募策略,于 2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 3 月期间进行了 11 个焦点小组和 5 个深度访谈。

设置

数据收集是通过虚拟方式进行的,参与者居住在马里兰州多样化(主要是城市)地区。

参与者

44 名主要家庭食品购买者,他们的孩子(年龄<8 岁)有资格获得补充营养援助计划(SNAP)。

感兴趣的现象

在线杂货购物的障碍和促进因素,以及社区提出的利用 SNAP 和在线食品零售商服务来减少健康食品获取不平等的策略。

分析

我们根据社会生态模型、计划行为理论和以公平为导向的框架对转录本进行了编码和分析。

结果

总体而言,我们在所有社会生态层面上确定了 10 个主题,这些主题都反映了在线购物的障碍和促进因素:(1)个人:购物者的信任、技术,(2)人际:配偶/孩子的需求,(3)社区:安全和保障,(4)组织:零售体验和食品质量,以及(5)政策:SNAP 和结构性不平等。参与者的建议包括改善食品获取和与雇佣购物者的沟通,实施更多的支付/节省成本的选择,并为 SNAP 参与者提供关于在线使用福利的教育计划。

结论和意义

低收入家庭确定了在线杂货购物的社会生态层面的障碍和促进因素,强调需要采取多层次的方法来促进公平。我们建议未来的工作探索建议的可行途径,这些途径涉及交付提供商、杂货店、营养教育者和政策制定者,利用在线杂货的功能(例如,膳食计划支持)和政策(例如,扩大 SNAP 在线购买试点计划以覆盖更多零售商)来减少对公平促进的在线杂货环境的阻碍因素(例如,免除送货费)。

相似文献

1
Equity-Promoting Strategies in Online Grocery Shopping: Recommendations Provided by Households of Low Income.在线杂货购物中的公平促进策略:低收入家庭提供的建议。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2022 Nov;54(11):998-1010. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2022.08.007.
2
"I Don't Want an App to Do the Work for Me": A Qualitative Study on the Perception of Online Grocery Shopping From Small Food Retailers.“我不想让应用程序为我代劳”:一项关于小型食品零售商对在线杂货购物看法的定性研究。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2024 Jul;124(7):804-822. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2023.12.005. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
3
Giving Families a Voice for Equitable Healthy Food Access in the Wake of Online Grocery Shopping.在在线杂货购物之后,为家庭争取公平健康食品获取权。
Nutrients. 2022 Oct 19;14(20):4377. doi: 10.3390/nu14204377.
4
Evidence of Geospatial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Access to Online Grocery Shopping for Fresh and Frozen Produce in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州线上购买新鲜和冷冻农产品的可达性存在地理空间和社会经济差异的证据。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2022 Nov;122(11):2106-2114. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2022.05.008. Epub 2022 May 13.
5
An equity-oriented systematic review of online grocery shopping among low-income populations: implications for policy and research.面向公平的低收入人群网上购物系统评价:对政策和研究的启示。
Nutr Rev. 2022 Apr 8;80(5):1294-1310. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuab122.
6
Barriers and Facilitators of Online Grocery Services: Perceptions from Rural and Urban Grocery Store Managers.在线杂货服务的障碍和促进因素:来自农村和城市杂货店经理的看法。
Nutrients. 2022 Sep 14;14(18):3794. doi: 10.3390/nu14183794.
7
Barriers and Facilitators to Online Grocery Shopping Among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Participants: A Mixed Method Study.补充营养援助计划(SNAP)参与者在线购买食品杂货的障碍和促进因素:一项混合方法研究。
Ecol Food Nutr. 2024 Sep-Oct;63(5):585-604. doi: 10.1080/03670244.2024.2392557. Epub 2024 Aug 18.
8
Online Grocery Shopping Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors Among SNAP Participants.在线食品杂货购物知识、态度和行为在 SNAP 参与者中。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2020 May;52(5):539-545. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2019.11.015. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
9
A Formative Evaluation of an Online Meal Kit and Grocery Platform for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Recipients.补充营养援助计划(SNAP)受益人群的在线餐包和杂货平台的形成性评价。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2024 Jan;56(1):43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2023.10.016. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
10
A click too far from fresh foods: A mixed methods comparison of online and in-store grocery behaviors among low-income households.与新鲜食品距离过远的点击:低收入家庭在线和店内食品杂货购买行为的混合方法比较
Appetite. 2022 Aug 1;175:106038. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106038. Epub 2022 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
A Cross-Sectional Study of Grocery Shopping Factors of Importance among Food-Insecure African Americans.一项针对粮食不安全的非裔美国人购物时重要因素的横断面研究。
Nutrients. 2024 Apr 17;16(8):1188. doi: 10.3390/nu16081188.
2
Giving Families a Voice for Equitable Healthy Food Access in the Wake of Online Grocery Shopping.在在线杂货购物之后,为家庭争取公平健康食品获取权。
Nutrients. 2022 Oct 19;14(20):4377. doi: 10.3390/nu14204377.