Center for Nutrition and Health Impact, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Department of Family and Consumer Sciences Extension, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Ecol Food Nutr. 2024 Sep-Oct;63(5):585-604. doi: 10.1080/03670244.2024.2392557. Epub 2024 Aug 18.
This mixed methods study explored online grocery shopping perceptions by surveying individuals who do and do not receive SNAP benefits ( = 129) and by conducting interviews with SNAP recipients ( = 26) who have grocery shopped online. T-tests assessed survey findings, codebook thematic analysis was used to identify qualitative themes, and results were interpreted collectively. Survey results found no differences in perceptions of online grocery shopping between SNAP and non-SNAP recipients (p-values = 0.2-1.0) and that 97% of SNAP recipients felt comfortable using SNAP online. Five qualitative themes were identified and provided context to the survey results. The study findings can inform policy actions within SNAP.
本混合方法研究通过调查接受和未接受 SNAP 福利的个人（ = 129）以及对已经在线购物的 SNAP 接受者（ = 26）进行访谈，探讨了在线杂货购物的看法。T 检验评估了调查结果，使用代码本主题分析来确定定性主题，结果进行了综合解释。调查结果发现，接受和未接受 SNAP 福利的人对在线杂货购物的看法没有差异（p 值 = 0.2-1.0），并且 97%的 SNAP 接受者觉得使用 SNAP 在线购物很舒服。确定了五个定性主题，并为调查结果提供了背景。研究结果可以为 SNAP 内的政策行动提供信息。
