Penitente Paulo Augusto, Da Silva Emily Vivianne Freitas, Goiato Marcelo Coelho, Maniçoba Lorena Louise Pontes, Brito Victor Gustavo Balera, Túrcio Karina Helga Leal, Rodrigues Alana Semenzin, Nagay Bruna Egumi, Dos Santos Daniela Micheline
Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba Dental School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba 16015-050, São Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 0508-000, São Paulo, Brazil.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Oct 27;11(11):1486. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11111486.
Irritation and biofilm adhesion are complaints associated with ocular prosthesis use. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of prosthesis repolishing on several conditions of anophthalmic volunteers. Participants were divided into two groups: intervention (IG, n = 10) and nonintervention (NIG, n = 6) groups. The anophthalmic cavity, contralateral eye, and prosthesis surface were evaluated at initial, day 15, and day 30 after repolishing. Microbiological analysis (colony-forming units), exfoliative cytology (conjunctiva inflammatory cells), sensory analysis (quantitative mechanical sensory test), tear production (Schirmer’s test), and conjunctival inflammation (clinical evaluation) were performed. Nonparametric tests were used to compare groups in the initial period and to analyze periods for the IG (p < 0.05). More microorganisms were formed in the anophthalmic socket and prosthesis than in the contralateral eye in the initial period. For IG, the anophthalmic cavity exhibited more microorganisms and inflammatory clinical signs in the initial period than at 15 and 30 after repolishing. The prosthesis showed greater accumulations of total bacteria and Candida albicans in the initial period than at 15 and 30 days after repolishing. The anophthalmic cavity had more palpebral inflammation than the contralateral eye. In conclusion, repolishing reduced the number of microorganisms and inflammatory signs over time.
刺激和生物膜黏附是与眼假体使用相关的问题。本研究旨在评估假体重新抛光对无眼球志愿者多种状况的影响。参与者被分为两组:干预组(IG,n = 10)和非干预组(NIG,n = 6)。在重新抛光后的初始、第15天和第30天,对无眼球腔、对侧眼和假体表面进行评估。进行了微生物学分析(菌落形成单位)、脱落细胞学检查(结膜炎症细胞)、感觉分析(定量机械感觉测试)、泪液分泌(泪液分泌试验)和结膜炎症(临床评估)。使用非参数检验比较初始阶段的组,并分析IG组各阶段情况(p < 0.05)。在初始阶段,无眼球窝和假体中形成的微生物比在对侧眼中更多。对于IG组,无眼球腔在初始阶段比重新抛光后第15天和第30天表现出更多的微生物和炎症临床体征。假体在初始阶段比重新抛光后第15天和第30天显示出更多的总细菌和白色念珠菌积聚。无眼球腔的睑部炎症比侧眼更多。总之,随着时间的推移,重新抛光减少了微生物数量和炎症体征。