• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚东部昆士兰东南部无人机巡逻中影响鲨鱼探测的因素。

Factors Affecting Shark Detection from Drone Patrols in Southeast Queensland, Eastern Australia.

作者信息

Mitchell Jonathan D, Scott-Holland Tracey B, Butcher Paul A

机构信息

Queensland Government, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Animal Science, Ecosciences Precinct, 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park, QLD 4102, Australia.

Queensland Government, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Fisheries Queensland, 41 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.

出版信息

Biology (Basel). 2022 Oct 23;11(11):1552. doi: 10.3390/biology11111552.

DOI:10.3390/biology11111552
PMID:36358255
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9687398/
Abstract

Drones enable the monitoring for sharks in real-time, enhancing the safety of ocean users with minimal impact on marine life. Yet, the effectiveness of drones for detecting sharks (especially potentially dangerous sharks; i.e., white shark, tiger shark, bull shark) has not yet been tested at Queensland beaches. To determine effectiveness, it is necessary to understand how environmental and operational factors affect the ability of drones to detect sharks. To assess this, we utilised data from the Queensland SharkSmart drone trial, which operated at five southeast Queensland beaches for 12 months in 2020−2021. The trial conducted 3369 flights, covering 1348 km and sighting 174 sharks (48 of which were >2 m in length). Of these, eight bull sharks and one white shark were detected, leading to four beach evacuations. The shark sighting rate was 3% when averaged across all beaches, with North Stradbroke Island (NSI) having the highest sighting rate (17.9%) and Coolum North the lowest (0%). Drone pilots were able to differentiate between key shark species, including white, bull and whaler sharks, and estimate total length of the sharks. Statistical analysis indicated that location, the sighting of other fauna, season and flight number (proxy for time of day) influenced the probability of sighting sharks.

摘要

无人机能够实时监测鲨鱼,在对海洋生物影响最小的情况下提高海洋使用者的安全性。然而,无人机在昆士兰海滩探测鲨鱼(尤其是潜在危险鲨鱼,即大白鲨、虎鲨、牛鲨)的有效性尚未经过测试。为了确定有效性,有必要了解环境和操作因素如何影响无人机探测鲨鱼的能力。为了评估这一点,我们利用了昆士兰鲨鱼智能无人机试验的数据,该试验于2020 - 2021年在昆士兰东南部的五个海滩进行了为期12个月的操作。该试验进行了3369次飞行,覆盖1348公里,发现了174条鲨鱼(其中48条长度超过2米)。其中,探测到8条牛鲨和1条大白鲨,导致4次海滩疏散。所有海滩的平均鲨鱼发现率为3%,北斯特拉德布罗克岛(NSI)的发现率最高(17.9%),库伦姆北部最低(0%)。无人机飞行员能够区分包括大白鲨、牛鲨和长尾鲨在内的主要鲨鱼种类,并估计鲨鱼的总长度。统计分析表明,位置、其他动物的出现、季节和飞行次数(代表一天中的时间)会影响发现鲨鱼的概率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2089/9687398/43f518ceded6/biology-11-01552-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2089/9687398/da7388a719f7/biology-11-01552-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2089/9687398/e7cdcfd80fd3/biology-11-01552-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2089/9687398/f1cdc237e887/biology-11-01552-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2089/9687398/43f518ceded6/biology-11-01552-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2089/9687398/da7388a719f7/biology-11-01552-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2089/9687398/e7cdcfd80fd3/biology-11-01552-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2089/9687398/f1cdc237e887/biology-11-01552-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2089/9687398/43f518ceded6/biology-11-01552-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors Affecting Shark Detection from Drone Patrols in Southeast Queensland, Eastern Australia.澳大利亚东部昆士兰东南部无人机巡逻中影响鲨鱼探测的因素。
Biology (Basel). 2022 Oct 23;11(11):1552. doi: 10.3390/biology11111552.
2
Predicting whaler shark presence and interactions with humans in southern Queensland, Australia.预测澳大利亚昆士兰州南部的抹香鲸的存在及其与人类的互动。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jul 15;934:172957. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172957. Epub 2024 May 7.
3
The Relative Abundance and Occurrence of Sharks off Ocean Beaches of New South Wales, Australia.澳大利亚新南威尔士州海洋海滩附近鲨鱼的相对丰度与出现情况
Biology (Basel). 2022 Oct 4;11(10):1456. doi: 10.3390/biology11101456.
4
Bull Shark () Occurrence along Beaches of South-Eastern Australia: Understanding Where, When and Why.公牛鲨()在澳大利亚东南部海滩的出现情况:了解其地点、时间和原因。
Biology (Basel). 2023 Aug 31;12(9):1189. doi: 10.3390/biology12091189.
5
Patterns of overlapping habitat use of juvenile white shark and human recreational water users along southern California beaches.南加州海滩幼年白鲨和人类休闲水上活动者重叠栖息地利用模式。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 2;18(6):e0286575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286575. eCollection 2023.
6
Identifying shark species responsible for fisheries depredation off Southeast Queensland, Australia.鉴定澳大利亚昆士兰州东南部渔业破坏事件中的肇事鲨鱼种类。
Mol Biol Rep. 2021 May;48(5):4961-4965. doi: 10.1007/s11033-021-06460-4. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
7
Legacy and emerging organic contaminants in two sympatric shark species from Reunion Island (Southwest Indian Ocean): Levels, profiles and maternal transfer.留尼汪岛(西南印度洋)两种共生鲨鱼物种中的传统和新兴有机污染物:水平、分布和母体转移。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jan 10;751:141807. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141807. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
8
Shifts in the incidence of shark bites and efficacy of beach-focussed mitigation in Australia.澳大利亚鲨鱼咬伤发病率的变化和以海滩为重点的缓解措施的效果。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2024 Jan;198:115855. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115855. Epub 2023 Dec 2.
9
Experimental evaluation of shark detection rates by aerial observers.空中观察员对鲨鱼探测率的实验评估。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 3;9(2):e83456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083456. eCollection 2014.
10
Increased shark bite survivability revealed by two centuries of Australian records.两个世纪的澳大利亚记录显示,鲨鱼咬伤的存活率有所提高。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 19;12(1):14121. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16950-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Patterns of overlapping habitat use of juvenile white shark and human recreational water users along southern California beaches.南加州海滩幼年白鲨和人类休闲水上活动者重叠栖息地利用模式。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 2;18(6):e0286575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286575. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The use of an unoccupied aerial vehicle to survey shark species over sand and rocky-reef habitats in a marine protected area.利用无人飞行器在一个海洋保护区的沙滩和岩石礁生境中调查鲨鱼物种。
J Fish Biol. 2021 Nov;99(5):1735-1740. doi: 10.1111/jfb.14838. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
2
Spatiotemporal distribution patterns of immature Australasian white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias).澳大利亚南部海域年轻的白鲨(Carcharodon carcharias)的时空分布模式。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 23;10(1):10169. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66876-z.
3
Variation in cownose ray Rhinoptera neglecta abundance and group size on the central east coast of Australia.
澳大利亚中东部海岸牛鼻魟 Rhinoptera neglecta 丰度和群体大小的变化。
J Fish Biol. 2020 Feb;96(2):427-433. doi: 10.1111/jfb.14219. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
4
Comparison of the reproductive ecology of two sympatric blacktip sharks (Carcharhinus limbatus and Carcharhinus tilstoni) off north-eastern Australia with species identification inferred from vertebral counts.比较澳大利亚东北部两种共生黑鳍鲨(Carcharhinus limbatus 和 Carcharhinus tilstoni)的生殖生态学,以及根据椎骨计数推断的物种鉴定。
J Fish Biol. 2012 Sep;81(4):1225-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03400.x. Epub 2012 Aug 15.