Yalynska Tetyana, Polacin Malgorzata, Frauenfelder Thomas, Martini Katharina
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 7;12(11):2715. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112715.
Purpose: To assess the impact of virtual-monoenergetic-image (VMI) energies on the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) in photon-counting-detector computed-tomography (PCD-CT). Methods: Eighty patients (median age 60.4 years) with suspected PE were retrospectively included. Scans were performed on PCD-CT in the multi-energy mode at 120 kV. VMIs from 40−70 keV in 10 keV intervals were reconstructed. CT-attenuation was measured in the pulmonary trunk and the main branches of the pulmonary artery. Signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio was calculated. Two radiologists evaluated subjective-image-quality (noise, vessel-attenuation and sharpness; five-point-Likert-scale, non-diagnostic−excellent), the presence of hardening artefacts and presence/visibility of PE. Results: Signal was highest at the lowest evaluated VMI (40 keV; 1053.50 HU); image noise was lowest at the highest VMI (70 keV; 15.60 HU). Highest SNR was achieved at the lowest VMI (p < 0.05). Inter-reader-agreement for subjective analysis was fair to excellent (k = 0.373−1.000; p < 0.001). Scores for vessel-attenuation and sharpness were highest at 40 keV (both:5, range 4/3−5; k = 1.000); scores for image-noise were highest at 70 keV (4, range 3−5). The highest number of hardening artifacts were reported at 40 keV (n = 22; 28%). PE-visualization was rated best at 50 keV (4.7; range 4−5) and decreased with increasing VMI-energy (r = −0.558; p < 0.001). Conclusions: While SNR was best at 40 keV, subjective PE visibility was rated highest at 50 keV, potentially owing to the lower image noise and hardening artefacts.
评估虚拟单能量图像(VMI)能量对光子计数探测器计算机断层扫描(PCD-CT)中肺栓塞(PE)诊断的影响。方法:回顾性纳入80例疑似PE患者(中位年龄60.4岁)。在PCD-CT上以120 kV的多能量模式进行扫描。重建40-70 keV、间隔为10 keV的VMI。在肺动脉主干和主要分支处测量CT衰减。计算信噪比(SNR)。两名放射科医生评估主观图像质量(噪声、血管衰减和清晰度;五点李克特量表,非诊断性-优秀)、硬化伪影的存在以及PE的存在/可见性。结果:在评估的最低VMI(40 keV;1053.50 HU)时信号最高;图像噪声在最高VMI(70 keV;15.60 HU)时最低。在最低VMI时获得最高SNR(p<0.05)。主观分析的读者间一致性为中等至优秀(k = 0.373-1.000;p<0.001)。血管衰减和清晰度评分在40 keV时最高(均为5分,范围4/3-5分;k = 1.000);图像噪声评分在70 keV时最高(4分,范围3-5分)。在40 keV时报告的硬化伪影数量最多(n = 22;28%)。PE可视化在50 keV时评级最佳(4.7分,范围4-5分),并随VMI能量增加而降低(r = -0.558;p<0.001)。结论:虽然40 keV时SNR最佳,但主观PE可见性在50 keV时评级最高,这可能是由于较低的图像噪声和硬化伪影。