ULR 2694 METRICS Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, Lille, France.
IMALLIANCE-Haut-de-France, Valenciennes, France.
Eur Radiol. 2024 Oct;34(10):6544-6555. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10724-5. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
To compare the diagnostic approach of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) with photon-counting-detector CT (PCD-CT) and energy-integrating-detector CT (EID-CT).
Two cohorts underwent CT angiographic examinations with EID-CT (Group 1; n = 158) and PCD-CT (Group 2; n = 172), (b) with two options in Group 1, dual energy (Group 1a) or single energy (Group 1b) and a single option in Group 2 (spectral imaging with single source).
In Group 2, all patients benefited from spectral imaging, only accessible to 105 patients (66.5%) in Group 1, with a mean acquisition time significantly shorter (0.9 ± 0.1 s vs 4.0 ± 0 .3 s; p < 0.001) and mean values of CTDI and DLP reduced by 46.3% and 47.7%, respectively. Comparing the quality of 70 keV (Group 2) and averaged (Group 1a) images: (a) the mean attenuation within pulmonary arteries did not differ (p = 0.13); (b) the image noise was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in Group 2 with no difference in subjective image noise (p = 0.29); and (c) 89% of examinations were devoid of artifacts in Group 2 vs 28.6% in Group 1a. The percentage of diagnostic examinations was 95.2% (100/105; Group 1a), 100% (53/53; Group 1b), and 95.3% (164/172; Group 2). There were 4.8% (5/105; Group 1a) and 4.7% (8/172; Group 2) of non-diagnostic examinations, mainly due to the suboptimal quality of vascular opacification with the restoration of a diagnostic image quality on low-energy images.
Compared to EID-CT, morphology and perfusion imaging were available in all patients scanned with PCD-CT, with the radiation dose reduced by 48%.
PCD-CT enables scanning patients with the advantages of both spectral imaging, including high-quality morphologic imaging and lung perfusion for all patients, and fast scanning-a combination that is not simultaneously accessible with EID-CT while reducing the radiation dose by almost 50%.
比较光子计数探测器 CT(PCD-CT)和能量积分探测器 CT(EID-CT)在急性肺栓塞(PE)诊断中的应用。
两组患者分别行 EID-CT(组 1;n=158)和 PCD-CT(组 2;n=172)CT 血管造影检查。(b)组 1 中有两种选择,双能(组 1a)或单能(组 1b),组 2 中只有一种选择(单源能谱成像)。
在组 2 中,所有患者均受益于能谱成像,而组 1 中只有 105 例(66.5%)患者可以进行能谱成像,其平均采集时间显著缩短(0.9±0.1 s 比 4.0±0.3 s;p<0.001),CTDI 和 DLP 分别降低 46.3%和 47.7%。比较 70 keV(组 2)和平均(组 1a)图像的质量:(a)肺动脉内平均衰减无差异(p=0.13);(b)组 2 中的图像噪声明显更高(p<0.001),而主观图像噪声无差异(p=0.29);(c)组 2 中 89%的检查无伪影,而组 1a 中只有 28.6%。组 2 中诊断性检查的百分比为 95.2%(100/105),组 1a 为 100%(53/53),组 1b 为 100%(53/53),组 2 为 95.3%(164/172)。组 1a 中有 4.8%(5/105)和组 2 中有 4.7%(8/172)的非诊断性检查,主要是由于血管显影质量不理想,而在低能图像上恢复了诊断性图像质量。
与 EID-CT 相比,PCD-CT 可用于所有接受扫描的患者,可提供形态学和灌注成像,辐射剂量降低 48%。
PCD-CT 可用于所有患者,结合了光谱成像的优势,包括高质量的形态学成像和肺灌注成像,同时快速扫描,而 EID-CT 无法同时实现这两种优势,且辐射剂量降低近 50%。