Caccianiga Paolo, Nota Alessandro, Tecco Simona, Ceraulo Saverio, Caccianiga Gianluigi
School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy.
Dental School, Vita-Salute San Raffaele Hospital and I.R.C.C.S. San Raffaele Hospital, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Nov 10;10(11):2255. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10112255.
The purpose of this study is to analyze the microbiota of patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with multibrackets and transparent aligners. The second goal is to evaluate the effectiveness of the oral irrigator on the oral hygiene and periodontal health of orthodontic patients. Fifty patients (27 F, 23 M; mean age 21.5 years) were recruited for the study, then divided into two groups. Group A underwent fixed orthodontic therapy with multibracket, and a home protocol that included manual orthodontic toothbrush, interdental brushes, and one-tuft brushes. Group B used transparent aligners for 22 h a day and a home protocol that included a manual brush with soft bristles and dental floss. After 3 months, all patients of the two groups, A and B, underwent plaque evaluation with a phase-contrast microscope. If the test result showed non-pathogenic bacterial flora, the subject continued with the traditional home oral-hygiene protocol. If the test detected pathogenic flora, the subject changed the home protocol, with a sonic toothbrush and oral irrigator, while the microbiological analysis continued to be performed after 3 months. After 3 months, 10 out of 25 patients treated with multibrackets (group A) and only 3 out of 25 patients with aligners (group B) passed from non-pathogenic flora to pathogenic flora. After 6 months, using the oral irrigator and a sonic toothbrush for 3 months, all subjects returned to non-pathogenic flora. This study confirms that in patients treated with multibrackets, the risk of developing unfavorable microbiota increases compared to those treated with clear aligners. The use of an oral irrigator combined with the sonic toothbrush seems to be able to restore good oral hygiene in subjects with pathogenic flora and therefore to be effective at reducing the risk of caries and gingivitis in orthodontic patients.
本研究的目的是分析接受多托槽正畸治疗和使用透明矫治器的患者的微生物群。第二个目标是评估口腔冲洗器对正畸患者口腔卫生和牙周健康的有效性。本研究招募了50名患者(27名女性,23名男性;平均年龄21.5岁),然后将其分为两组。A组接受多托槽固定正畸治疗,并采用包括手动正畸牙刷、牙间隙刷和单束毛牙刷的家庭护理方案。B组每天使用透明矫治器22小时,并采用包括软毛手动牙刷和牙线的家庭护理方案。3个月后,A、B两组的所有患者均使用相差显微镜进行菌斑评估。如果检测结果显示为非致病性菌群,则受试者继续采用传统的家庭口腔卫生护理方案。如果检测到致病性菌群,则受试者更换家庭护理方案,使用声波牙刷和口腔冲洗器,同时在3个月后继续进行微生物分析。3个月后,25名接受多托槽治疗的患者(A组)中有10名,而25名使用矫治器的患者(B组)中只有3名从非致病性菌群转变为致病性菌群。6个月后,使用口腔冲洗器和声波牙刷3个月后,所有受试者均恢复为非致病性菌群。本研究证实,与使用透明矫治器治疗的患者相比,接受多托槽治疗的患者出现不良微生物群的风险增加。使用口腔冲洗器结合声波牙刷似乎能够恢复致病性菌群患者的良好口腔卫生,因此在降低正畸患者龋齿和牙龈炎风险方面有效。