Li Xu, Peng Xiaobing, Peng Yu
School of Public Policy and Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400044, China.
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 26;9(12):e22851. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22851. eCollection 2023 Dec.
Agricultural inputs have a significant catabatic effect on rural poverty at present. However, few studies have assessed whether agricultural inputs inhibit the intending probability of being vulnerable to rural poverty, referred to as poverty vulnerability. Poverty vulnerability studies, which focus on the likeli-hood of poverty among households in the future, have forward-looking and prognostic features in poverty research. Such research provides essential tools for describing mechanisms that can eradicate poverty. This study investigates the impact of agricultural inputs on rural poverty vulnerability and the mechanisms of action, using data from the 2015 China Household Finance Survey (CHFS). The empirical results show that agricultural inputs significantly suppress the probability of rural poverty vulnerability. The results hold after replacing the poverty criterion, poverty vulnerability criterion, and core explanatory variables. To overcome the endogeneity problem created by possible reverse cau-sality and omitted variables in the baseline model, this study uses the instrumental variables method to test endogeneity. The study also applies a treatment effects model and propensity score matching method to estimate and address any endogeneity problems due to explanatory variables. The findings also remain robust and significant after addressing the endogeneity problem. Further analyses indicate that the inhibitive effect of agricultural inputs on rural poverty vulnerability is mainly achieved through increased agricultural yields, improved physical health, and increased opportunities for entre-preneurial behavior. A heterogeneity analysis finds that the inhibitive effect of agricultural inputs on poverty vulnerability is more pronounced in Midwest China, in households with physically healthy household heads, and in families whose leaders have risk preferences. Our findings provide empirical evidence that can help inform forward-looking and prognostic policies for developing countries when formulating anti-poverty strategies.
目前,农业投入对农村贫困具有显著的递减效应。然而,很少有研究评估农业投入是否会抑制陷入农村贫困的可能性,即贫困脆弱性。贫困脆弱性研究关注家庭未来陷入贫困的可能性,在贫困研究中具有前瞻性和预后性特征。此类研究为描述消除贫困的机制提供了重要工具。本研究利用2015年中国家庭金融调查(CHFS)的数据,考察了农业投入对农村贫困脆弱性的影响及其作用机制。实证结果表明,农业投入显著降低了农村贫困脆弱性的概率。在更换贫困标准、贫困脆弱性标准和核心解释变量后,结果依然成立。为克服基线模型中可能存在的反向因果关系和遗漏变量所造成的内生性问题,本研究采用工具变量法检验内生性。该研究还应用了处理效应模型和倾向得分匹配法来估计并解决因解释变量导致的任何内生性问题。在解决内生性问题后,研究结果依然稳健且显著。进一步分析表明,农业投入对农村贫困脆弱性的抑制作用主要通过提高农业产量、改善身体健康状况以及增加创业行为机会来实现。异质性分析发现,农业投入对贫困脆弱性的抑制作用在中国中西部地区、户主身体健康的家庭以及户主具有风险偏好的家庭中更为明显。我们的研究结果提供了实证证据,有助于发展中国家在制定扶贫战略时制定具有前瞻性和预后性的政策。