Suppr超能文献

半经验量子化学方法在 soot 形成模拟中的准确性。

The Accuracy of Semi-Empirical Quantum Chemistry Methods on Soot Formation Simulation.

机构信息

Institute of Theoretical Chemistry, College of Chemistry, Jilin University, 2519 Jiefang Road, Changchun 130023, China.

Institute of Systems and Physical Biology, Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen 518055, China.

出版信息

Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 2;23(21):13371. doi: 10.3390/ijms232113371.

Abstract

Soot molecules are hazardous compounds threatening human health. Computational chemistry provides efficient tools for studying them. However, accurate quantum chemistry calculation is costly for the simulation of large-size soot molecules and high-throughput calculations. Semi-empirical (SE) quantum chemistry methods are optional choices for balancing computational costs. In this work, we validated the performances of several widely used SE methods in the description of soot formation. Our benchmark study focuses on, but is not limited to, the validation of the performances of SE methods on reactive and non-reactive MD trajectory calculations. We also examined the accuracy of SE methods of predicting soot precursor structures and energy profiles along intrinsic reaction coordinate(s) (IRC). Finally, we discussed the spin density predicted by SE methods. The SE methods validated include AM1, PM6, PM7, GFN2-xTB, DFTB2, with or without spin-polarization, and DFTB3. We found that the shape of MD trajectory profiles, the relative energy, and molecular structures predicted by SE methods are qualitatively correct. We suggest that SE methods can be used in massive reaction soot formation event sampling and primary reaction mechanism generation. Yet, they cannot be used to provide quantitatively accurate data, such as thermodynamic and reaction kinetics ones.

摘要

soot 分子是威胁人类健康的有害化合物。计算化学为研究它们提供了有效的工具。然而,对于大规模 soot 分子和高通量计算的模拟,准确的量子化学计算成本很高。半经验(SE)量子化学方法是平衡计算成本的可选选择。在这项工作中,我们验证了几种广泛使用的 SE 方法在 soot 形成描述中的性能。我们的基准研究重点但不限于验证 SE 方法在反应和非反应 MD 轨迹计算中的性能。我们还检查了 SE 方法预测 soot 前体结构和沿本征反应坐标(IRC)的能量分布的准确性。最后,我们讨论了 SE 方法预测的自旋密度。验证的 SE 方法包括 AM1、PM6、PM7、GFN2-xTB、DFTB2,带或不带自旋极化,以及 DFTB3。我们发现 SE 方法预测的 MD 轨迹轮廓的形状、相对能量和分子结构在定性上是正确的。我们建议 SE 方法可用于大规模反应 soot 形成事件采样和主要反应机制生成。然而,它们不能用于提供定量准确的数据,例如热力学和反应动力学数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8fc/9657144/09a54bfb1ac1/ijms-23-13371-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验