Willy Daniela, Schmitz Ralf, Klockenbusch Walter, Köster Helen Ann, Willy Kevin, Braun Janina, Möllers Mareike, Oelmeier Kathrin
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 27;11(21):6334. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216334.
Background: Timing and mode of delivery in women with preeclampsia remains challenging, often balancing the risk of severe maternal complications and preterm delivery with its risks for the newborn. It is known that women with very high blood pressure levels in pregnancy have more unfavourable outcomes, but there is little data on neonatal outcome in these cases and the effect of the delivery mode. Methods: We included 158 preeclamptic women in our single-centre retrospective cohort study. Patients were divided into three subgroups depending on blood pressure levels, and delivery mode as well as neonatal outcomes were analysed. Furthermore, the effect of gestational age at delivery was assessed. Results: Maternal blood pressure levels correlated negatively with gestational age at delivery (p = 0.007) and positively with delivery via caesarean section (p = 0.003). Induction of labour was more frequent in women with lower blood pressure levels (p = 0.008) and higher gestational age (p < 0.001). If labour was induced, vaginal delivery was achieved equally often in all gestational ages. Neonatal outcome appears to be more favourable after vaginal delivery compared to planned caesarean section (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Induction of labour should be discussed generously in preeclamptic women, even if blood pressure levels are high and/or gestational age is young, as success rates seem to be adequate and neonatal outcome is more favourable after vaginal delivery. Large prospective trials are needed to better evaluate success rates, risks and complications of induced labour and the effects of delivery mode on neonatal outcome in preeclampsia.
子痫前期女性的分娩时机和方式仍然具有挑战性,通常需要在孕产妇严重并发症风险与早产及其对新生儿的风险之间进行权衡。已知孕期血压水平非常高的女性预后更差,但关于这些病例的新生儿结局以及分娩方式的影响的数据很少。方法:我们在单中心回顾性队列研究中纳入了158例子痫前期女性。根据血压水平将患者分为三个亚组,并分析分娩方式和新生儿结局。此外,评估了分娩时孕周的影响。结果:孕产妇血压水平与分娩时孕周呈负相关(p = 0.007),与剖宫产分娩呈正相关(p = 0.003)。血压水平较低(p = 0.008)和孕周较大(p < 0.001)的女性引产更为频繁。如果引产,所有孕周的阴道分娩成功率相同。与计划剖宫产相比,阴道分娩后的新生儿结局似乎更有利(p < 0.001)。结论:对于子痫前期女性,即使血压水平高和/或孕周小,也应充分讨论引产,因为成功率似乎足够,且阴道分娩后新生儿结局更有利。需要进行大型前瞻性试验,以更好地评估引产的成功率、风险和并发症以及分娩方式对子痫前期新生儿结局的影响。