• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于淋巴细胞的指标和比值在粒细胞集落刺激因子治疗后化疗引起的发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者中的预后价值。

The Prognostic Utility of Lymphocyte-Based Measures and Ratios in Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia Patients following Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Therapy.

机构信息

Division of Urology, Department of General Surgery and Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science & Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan.

Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science & Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Oct 24;58(11):1508. doi: 10.3390/medicina58111508.

DOI:10.3390/medicina58111508
PMID:36363465
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9695543/
Abstract

Chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia is the most widespread oncologic emergency with high morbidity and mortality rates. Herein we present a retrospective risk factor identification study to evaluate the prognostic role of lymphocyte-based measures and ratios in a cohort of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia patients following granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy. : The electronic medical records at our center were utilized to identify patients with a first attack of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia and were treated accordingly with G-CSF between January 2010 to December 2020. Patients' demographics and disease characteristics along with laboratory tests data were extracted. Prognosis-related indicators were the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) at admission and the following 6 days besides the length of stay and mortality rate. : A total of 80 patients were enrolled, which were divided according to the absolute lymphocyte count at admission into two groups, the first includes lymphopenia patients ( = 55) and the other is the non-lymphopenia group ( = 25) with a cutoff point of 700 lymphocytes/μL. Demographics and baseline characteristics were generally insignificant among the two groups but the white blood cell count was higher in the non-lymphopenia group. ANC, neutrophils percentage and ANC difference in reference to admission among the two study groups were totally insignificant. The same insignificant pattern was observed in the length of stay and the mortality rate. Univariate analysis utilizing the ANC difference compared to the admission day as the dependent variable, revealed no predictability role in the first three days of follow up for any of the variables included. However, during the fourth day of follow up, both WBC (OR = 0.261; 95% CI: 0.075, 0.908; = 0.035) and lymphocyte percentage (OR = 1.074; 95% CI: 1.012, 1.141; = 0.019) were marginally significant, in which increasing WBC was associated with a reduction in the likelihood of ANC count increase, compared to the lymphocyte percentage which exhibited an increase in the likelihood. In comparison, sequential ANC difference models demonstrated lymphocyte percentage (OR = 0.961; 95% CI: 0.932, 0.991; = 0.011) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (OR = 7.436; 95% CI: 1.024, 54.020; = 0.047) reduction and increment in the enhancement of ANC levels, respectively. The fifth day had WBC (OR = 0.790; 95% CI: 0.675, 0.925; = 0.003) to be significantly decreasing the likelihood of ANC increment. we were unable to determine any concrete prognostic role of lymphocyte-related measures and ratios. It is plausible that several limitations could have influenced the results obtained, but as far as our analysis is concerned ALC role as a predictive factor for ANC changes remains questionable.

摘要

化疗引起的发热性中性粒细胞减少症是最常见的肿瘤急症,发病率和死亡率都很高。在此,我们进行了一项回顾性危险因素识别研究,以评估在接受粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)治疗后,一组化疗引起的发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者的淋巴细胞为基础的指标和比值的预后作用。

我们利用中心的电子病历,确定了 2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间首次发生化疗引起的发热性中性粒细胞减少症并接受 G-CSF 治疗的患者。提取了患者的人口统计学和疾病特征以及实验室检查数据。预后相关指标为入院时和入院后第 6 天的绝对中性粒细胞计数(ANC)以及住院时间和死亡率。

共纳入 80 例患者,根据入院时的绝对淋巴细胞计数分为两组,第一组包括淋巴细胞减少症患者(=55 例)和非淋巴细胞减少症组(=25 例),截断值为 700 个淋巴细胞/μL。两组的人口统计学和基线特征一般无显著差异,但非淋巴细胞减少症组的白细胞计数较高。两组研究的 ANC、中性粒细胞百分比和 ANC 与入院时的差异均无显著差异。住院时间和死亡率也呈现出相同的无显著性模式。利用 ANC 与入院日的差异作为因变量的单变量分析显示,在随访的前三天,包括的任何变量均无预测作用。然而,在第四天的随访中,白细胞(OR=0.261;95%CI:0.075,0.908;=0.035)和淋巴细胞百分比(OR=1.074;95%CI:1.012,1.141;=0.019)均具有边际显著性,其中白细胞的增加与 ANC 计数增加的可能性降低有关,而淋巴细胞百分比的增加与 ANC 计数增加的可能性增加有关。相比之下,连续 ANC 差异模型显示淋巴细胞百分比(OR=0.961;95%CI:0.932,0.991;=0.011)和单核细胞/淋巴细胞比值(OR=7.436;95%CI:1.024,54.020;=0.047)分别降低和增加 ANC 水平的增强。第五天白细胞(OR=0.790;95%CI:0.675,0.925;=0.003)显著降低 ANC 增加的可能性。我们无法确定淋巴细胞相关指标和比值的具体预后作用。有几个限制因素可能会影响到研究结果,但就我们的分析而言,ALC 作为 ANC 变化的预测因子的作用仍然存在疑问。

相似文献

1
The Prognostic Utility of Lymphocyte-Based Measures and Ratios in Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia Patients following Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Therapy.基于淋巴细胞的指标和比值在粒细胞集落刺激因子治疗后化疗引起的发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者中的预后价值。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Oct 24;58(11):1508. doi: 10.3390/medicina58111508.
2
Evaluating the Prognostic Role of Monocytopenia in Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia Patients Treated with Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor.评估单核细胞减少症在接受粒细胞集落刺激因子治疗的化疗引起的发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者中的预后作用。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2021 Sep 7;17:963-973. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S318370. eCollection 2021.
3
Platelet-lymphocyte Ratio After Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor Administration: an Early Prognostic Marker in Septic Shock Patients With Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia.粒细胞集落刺激因子给药后血小板-淋巴细胞比值:化疗诱导的发热性中性粒细胞减少症败血症休克患者的早期预后标志物。
Shock. 2019 Aug;52(2):160-165. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001256.
4
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Use after Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation: Comparison of Two Practices.粒细胞集落刺激因子在自体外周血造血干细胞移植后的应用:两种方案的比较。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018 Feb;24(2):288-293. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.10.026. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
5
Effects of Prophylactic Administration of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor on Peripheral Leukocyte and Neutrophil Counts Levels After Chemotherapy in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.预防性应用粒细胞集落刺激因子对早期乳腺癌患者化疗后外周血白细胞及中性粒细胞计数水平的影响:一项回顾性队列研究
Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 25;12:777602. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.777602. eCollection 2022.
6
Outcome of febrile neutropenic patients on granulocyte colony stimulating factor in a tertiary care hospital.三级医院中接受粒细胞集落刺激因子治疗的发热性中性粒细胞减少患者的治疗结果
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(6):2523-6. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.6.2523.
7
Full-dose chemotherapy in early stage breast cancer regardless of absolute neutrophil count and without G-CSF does not increase chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia.早期乳腺癌的全剂量化疗,无论绝对中性粒细胞计数如何,且不使用 G-CSF,并不增加化疗引起的发热性中性粒细胞减少症。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Oct;21(10):2727-31. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1851-2. Epub 2013 May 26.
8
Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on outcomes in patients with non-M3 acute myelogenous leukemia treated with anthracycline-based induction (7+3 regimen) chemotherapies.粒细胞集落刺激因子对接受蒽环类诱导(7+3方案)化疗的非M3型急性髓系白血病患者结局的影响。
Leuk Res. 2017 Jun;57:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
9
Colony-stimulating factors for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia.用于化疗引起的发热性中性粒细胞减少症的集落刺激因子。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 30;2014(10):CD003039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003039.pub2.
10
[Treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: a multi-center randomized controlled phase II clinical study].聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子治疗化疗所致中性粒细胞减少症:一项多中心随机对照II期临床研究
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Dec 26;86(48):3414-9.

本文引用的文献

1
What Is the Most Effective Empirical Antibiotic Treatment for Early, Delayed, and Late Fracture-Related Infections?对于早期、延迟性和晚期骨折相关感染,最有效的经验性抗生素治疗是什么?
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Feb 22;11(3):287. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11030287.
2
Evaluating the Prognostic Role of Monocytopenia in Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia Patients Treated with Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor.评估单核细胞减少症在接受粒细胞集落刺激因子治疗的化疗引起的发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者中的预后作用。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2021 Sep 7;17:963-973. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S318370. eCollection 2021.
3
Pegfilgrastim for primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in multiple myeloma.培非格司亭用于多发性骨髓瘤的发热性中性粒细胞减少症的初级预防。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Nov;29(11):6973-6980. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06266-x. Epub 2021 May 14.
4
Predicting in-hospital mortality of patients with febrile neutropenia using machine learning models.使用机器学习模型预测发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者的住院死亡率。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Jul;139:104140. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104140. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
5
Predictive value of monocytes and lymphocytes for short-term neutrophil changes in chemotherapy-induced severe neutropenia in solid tumors.预测单核细胞和淋巴细胞对实体瘤化疗引起的重度中性粒细胞减少症中短期中性粒细胞变化的价值。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Mar;28(3):1289-1294. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04946-3. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
6
Optimal Management of Neutropenic Fever in Patients With Cancer.癌症患者中性粒细胞减少性发热的最佳管理。
J Oncol Pract. 2019 Jan;15(1):19-24. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00269.
7
Platelet-lymphocyte Ratio After Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor Administration: an Early Prognostic Marker in Septic Shock Patients With Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia.粒细胞集落刺激因子给药后血小板-淋巴细胞比值:化疗诱导的发热性中性粒细胞减少症败血症休克患者的早期预后标志物。
Shock. 2019 Aug;52(2):160-165. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001256.
8
Neutropenic Fever.中性粒细胞减少性发热
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2017 Dec;31(6):981-993. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2017.08.004.
9
Cytokine Kinetics in Febrile Neutropenic Children: Insights on the Usefulness as Sepsis Biomarkers, Influence of Filgrastim, and Behavior of the IL-23/IL-17 Pathway.发热性中性粒细胞减少症儿童细胞因子动力学:作为脓毒症生物标志物的有用性、粒细胞集落刺激因子的影响以及 IL-23/IL-17 通路的行为。
Mediators Inflamm. 2017;2017:8291316. doi: 10.1155/2017/8291316. Epub 2017 Jul 9.
10
Cost of Cancer-Related Neutropenia or Fever Hospitalizations, United States, 2012.2012年美国癌症相关性中性粒细胞减少症或发热住院费用
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Jun;13(6):e552-e561. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.019588. Epub 2017 Apr 24.