Department of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology (IBE), LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Nutrients. 2022 Oct 26;14(21):4498. doi: 10.3390/nu14214498.
Temporalis muscle (TM) atrophy has emerged as a potential biomarker for muscle wasting. However, its diagnostic utility as a monitoring tool in intensive care remains uncertain. Hence, the objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of sequential ultrasound- and computed tomography (CT)-based measurements of TM thickness (TMT). With a prospective observational design, we included 40 patients without preexisting sarcopenia admitted to a neurointensive care unit. TMT measurements, performed upon admission and serially every 3−4 days, were correlated with rectus femoris muscle thickness (RFT) ultrasound measurements. Interrater reliability was assessed by Bland Altmann plots and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Analysis of variance was performed in subgroups to evaluate differences in the standard error of measurement (SEM). RFT decline was paralleled by ultrasound- as well as CT-based TMT measurements (TMT to RFT: r = 0.746, p < 0.001; CT-based TMT to ultrasound-based RFT: r = 0.609, p < 0.001). ICC was 0.80 [95% CI 0.74, 0.84] for ultrasound-based assessment and 0.90 [95% CI 0.88, 0.92] for CT-based TMT measurements. Analysis of variance for BMI, Heckmatt score, fluid balance, and agitation showed no evidence of measurement errors in these subgroups. This study demonstrates the clinical feasibility and utility of ultrasound- and CT-based TMT measurements for the assessment of muscle wasting.
颞肌(TM)萎缩已成为肌肉消耗的潜在生物标志物。然而,其作为重症监护监测工具的诊断效用尚不确定。因此,本研究的目的是评估基于超声和计算机断层扫描(CT)的 TM 厚度(TMT)连续测量的诊断价值。采用前瞻性观察设计,我们纳入了 40 名无预先存在的肌肉减少症的神经重症监护病房患者。入院时和每 3-4 天进行一次 TMT 测量,并与股直肌厚度(RFT)超声测量相关。通过 Bland-Altman 图和组内相关系数(ICC)评估了观察者间的可靠性。在亚组中进行方差分析,以评估测量标准误差(SEM)的差异。RFT 下降与超声和 CT 基 TMT 测量相平行(TMT 与 RFT:r = 0.746,p < 0.001;基于 CT 的 TMT 与基于超声的 RFT:r = 0.609,p < 0.001)。超声测量的 ICC 为 0.80 [95%置信区间 0.74,0.84],CT 基 TMT 测量的 ICC 为 0.90 [95%置信区间 0.88,0.92]。BMI、Heckmatt 评分、液体平衡和躁动的方差分析表明,这些亚组中没有测量误差的证据。本研究证明了超声和 CT 基 TMT 测量在评估肌肉消耗方面的临床可行性和实用性。