Perkisas Stany, Baudry Stéphane, Bauer Jürgen, Beckwée David, De Cock Anne-Marie, Hobbelen Hans, Jager-Wittenaar Harriët, Kasiukiewicz Agnieszka, Landi Francesco, Marco Ester, Merello Ana, Piotrowicz Karolina, Sanchez Elisabet, Sanchez-Rodriguez Dolores, Scafoglieri Aldo, Cruz-Jentoft Alfonso, Vandewoude Maurits
University of Antwerp-University Geriatric Center, Leopoldstraat 26, 2000, Antwerp, Belgium.
Belgian Ageing Muscle Society, Liege, Belgium.
Eur Geriatr Med. 2018 Dec;9(6):739-757. doi: 10.1007/s41999-018-0104-9. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
Measurement of muscle mass is paramount in the screening and diagnosis of sarcopenia. Besides muscle quantity however, also quality assessment is important. Ultrasonography (US) has the advantage over dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and bio-impedance analysis (BIA) to give both quantitative and qualitative information on muscle. However, before its use in clinical practice, several methodological aspects still need to be addressed. Both standardization in measurement techniques and the availability of reference values are currently lacking. This review aims to provide an evidence-based standardization of assessing appendicular muscle with the use of US.
A systematic review was performed for ultrasonography to assess muscle in older people. Pubmed, SCOPUS and Web of Sciences were searched. All articles regarding the use of US in assessing appendicular muscle were used. Description of US-specific parameters and localization of the measurement were retrieved.
Through this process, five items of muscle assessment were identified in the evaluated articles: thickness, cross-sectional area, echogenicity, fascicle length and pennation angle. Different techniques for measurement and location of measurement used were noted, as also the different muscles in which this was evaluated. Then, a translation for a clinical setting in a standardized way was proposed.
The results of this review provide thus an evidence base for an ultrasound protocol in the assessment of skeletal muscle. This standardization of measurements is the first step in creating conditions to further test the applicability of US for use on a large scale as a routine assessment and follow-up tool for appendicular muscle.
肌肉量的测量在肌肉减少症的筛查和诊断中至关重要。然而,除了肌肉量之外,质量评估也很重要。超声检查(US)相较于双能X线吸收法(DEXA)和生物电阻抗分析(BIA)具有优势,能够提供有关肌肉的定量和定性信息。然而,在将其应用于临床实践之前,仍有几个方法学方面的问题需要解决。目前缺乏测量技术的标准化以及参考值。本综述旨在为使用超声评估四肢肌肉提供基于证据的标准化方法。
对超声评估老年人肌肉的研究进行系统综述。检索了PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库。纳入所有关于使用超声评估四肢肌肉的文章。提取超声特定参数的描述和测量部位。
通过这个过程,在评估的文章中确定了五项肌肉评估内容:厚度、横截面积、回声性、肌束长度和羽状角。记录了所使用的不同测量技术和测量位置,以及评估这些内容的不同肌肉。然后,提出了一种标准化的临床应用转换方法。
因此,本综述的结果为骨骼肌评估中的超声检查方案提供了证据基础。这种测量标准化是创造条件进一步测试超声作为四肢肌肉常规评估和随访工具大规模应用适用性的第一步。