School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.
Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Nutrients. 2022 Nov 3;14(21):4633. doi: 10.3390/nu14214633.
The purpose of this research is: (1) to determine the prevalence of food insecurity among pregnant people using the 10-, 6-, and 2-item iterations of the USA Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM) and the single item measure, and (2) identify an appropriate combination of questions that could be used to identify food insecurity in a clinical setting for a population of people who are pregnant in Australia. Cross-sectional survey collecting self-reported data from pregnant people in Australia (open May 2021 to March 2022). Survey included demographic characteristics, including income/welfare use, education, age, pregnancy information, household size and composition, and two measures of food insecurity. In total, 303 participants were included in the analysis. Sensitivity and specificity of the various combinations of questions were conducted. Food insecurity was estimated using the single item, and the 2-item, 6-item, and 10-item versions of the HFSSM, food insecurity was 6.2%, 11.4%, 11.7%, and 14.3% respectively. Respondents who were living in households that were food insecure answered affirmatively to question one, two, or three of the HFSSM, with the combination of questions one and three showing the best sensitivity and specificity for the whole sample, as well as for those who have characteristics likely to lead to food insecurity. Further testing of the 2-items, comprised of items one and three from the HFSSM, need to be conducted with a larger and more diverse sample to determine if this is an appropriate screening tool in an antenatal clinical setting to determine food insecurity during pregnancy.
(1)使用美国家庭食品安全调查模块(HFSSM)的 10 项、6 项和 2 项迭代以及单一项目措施来确定孕妇食物不安全的流行率;(2)确定可用于在澳大利亚孕妇人群的临床环境中识别食物不安全的适当问题组合。这是一项横断面调查,从澳大利亚的孕妇中收集自我报告数据(2021 年 5 月至 2022 年 3 月开放)。调查包括人口统计特征,包括收入/福利使用、教育、年龄、怀孕信息、家庭规模和构成,以及两项食物不安全措施。共有 303 名参与者纳入分析。对各种问题组合的敏感性和特异性进行了测试。使用单一项目和 HFSSM 的 2 项、6 项和 10 项版本估计食物不安全,食物不安全的发生率分别为 6.2%、11.4%、11.7%和 14.3%。居住在食物不安全家庭的受访者对 HFSSM 的问题一、二或三回答肯定,问题一和三的组合对整个样本以及那些具有导致食物不安全特征的样本显示出最佳的敏感性和特异性。需要进一步测试由 HFSSM 的问题一和三组成的 2 项问题,以确定其在产前临床环境中是否是确定怀孕期间食物不安全的适当筛查工具,需要使用更大和更多样化的样本进行。