• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有人机/无人机协同任务中触摸屏适用性的研究。

Research on the Applicability of Touchscreens in Manned/Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Cooperative Missions.

机构信息

School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China.

School of Marine Science and Technology, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2022 Nov 2;22(21):8435. doi: 10.3390/s22218435.

DOI:10.3390/s22218435
PMID:36366137
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9654244/
Abstract

The suitability of touchscreens for human-computer interaction in manned/unmanned aerial vehicle cooperative missions remains uncertain, especially in situations that are time-sensitive with variations in difficulty levels. The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of touchscreen applications in manned/unmanned aerial vehicle cooperative missions and the magnitude of the effects of time pressure and task difficulty. In contrast to previous studies, a combination of performance and perceptual load measures was used to divide errors into disposition errors, undetected errors, and miscalculation errors to explore specific error mechanisms, set up typical manned/unmanned aerial vehicle cooperative human-computer interaction tasks, and set up antecedent features for potential factors. Thirty subjects participated in an experiment that required the use of touchscreens or keyboards to perform a human-computer interaction task in a simulated manned/unmanned aerial vehicle cooperative mission. Experiments were set at three task difficulties: low, medium, and high, and were matched to a set time pressure or no time pressure for two seconds for low difficulty, three seconds for medium difficulty, and four seconds for high difficulty. The results showed that the touchscreens improved the participants' response speed at a time pressure of 2 s or less compared with the use of a general input device; however, the task error rate also increased significantly. The higher the task difficulty was, the worse the performance was and the greater the perceived workload of the participants. The application of touchscreens in dynamic environments subjected the participants to greater physical demands. The performance of participants using a keyboard was no better than that when touchscreens were used during the experiment. Moreover, touchscreens did not significantly improve participant performance. The results support the possibility of using touchscreens in manned/unmanned aerial vehicle cooperative missions.

摘要

在载人/无人机协同任务中,触摸屏用于人机交互的适用性仍不确定,尤其是在时间敏感且难度水平变化的情况下。本研究旨在确定触摸屏应用在载人/无人机协同任务中的可行性,以及时间压力和任务难度的影响程度。与以往的研究不同,本研究结合了绩效和感知负荷测量,将错误分为处置错误、未检测错误和误算错误,以探索特定的错误机制,设置典型的载人/无人机协同人机交互任务,并为潜在因素设置先行特征。三十名受试者参与了一项实验,要求他们使用触摸屏或键盘在模拟的载人/无人机协同任务中执行人机交互任务。实验设置了三个任务难度:低、中、高,并分别对应于设定的时间压力或无时间压力(低难度为 2 秒,中难度为 3 秒,高难度为 4 秒)。结果表明,与使用通用输入设备相比,在 2 秒或更短的时间压力下,触摸屏提高了参与者的响应速度;然而,任务错误率也显著增加。任务难度越高,参与者的表现越差,感知的工作负荷越大。在动态环境中使用触摸屏会对参与者的身体提出更高的要求。在实验过程中,参与者使用键盘的表现并不优于使用触摸屏时的表现。此外,触摸屏并没有显著提高参与者的表现。研究结果支持在载人/无人机协同任务中使用触摸屏的可能性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a5/9654244/0f1439b9a29a/sensors-22-08435-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a5/9654244/dd6835a4e5c6/sensors-22-08435-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a5/9654244/8a4ed735b3bb/sensors-22-08435-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a5/9654244/09c864e9148a/sensors-22-08435-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a5/9654244/966025dd094a/sensors-22-08435-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a5/9654244/d9afa49ae1fd/sensors-22-08435-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a5/9654244/5f1b966dce86/sensors-22-08435-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a5/9654244/ce7a578e5211/sensors-22-08435-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a5/9654244/0f1439b9a29a/sensors-22-08435-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a5/9654244/dd6835a4e5c6/sensors-22-08435-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a5/9654244/8a4ed735b3bb/sensors-22-08435-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a5/9654244/09c864e9148a/sensors-22-08435-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a5/9654244/966025dd094a/sensors-22-08435-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a5/9654244/d9afa49ae1fd/sensors-22-08435-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a5/9654244/5f1b966dce86/sensors-22-08435-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a5/9654244/ce7a578e5211/sensors-22-08435-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a5/9654244/0f1439b9a29a/sensors-22-08435-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Research on the Applicability of Touchscreens in Manned/Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Cooperative Missions.有人机/无人机协同任务中触摸屏适用性的研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Nov 2;22(21):8435. doi: 10.3390/s22218435.
2
Effects of Touch, Voice, and Multimodal Input, and Task Load on Multiple-UAV Monitoring Performance During Simulated Manned-Unmanned Teaming in a Military Helicopter.触摸、语音和多模式输入以及任务负载对模拟载人-无人机协同作战中军事直升机中多架无人机监控性能的影响。
Hum Factors. 2018 Dec;60(8):1117-1129. doi: 10.1177/0018720818788995. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
3
Mental workload assessments of aerial photography missions performed by novice unmanned aerial vehicle operators.新手无人机操作员执行航空摄影任务的心理工作量评估。
Work. 2023;75(1):181-193. doi: 10.3233/WOR-211222.
4
Subjective and objective assessments of mental workload for UAV operations.无人机操作的心理工作负荷的主观和客观评估。
Work. 2022;72(1):291-301. doi: 10.3233/WOR-205318.
5
Research on Lateral Safety Spacing for Fusion Operation Based on Unmanned and Manned Aircraft-Event Modeling.基于无人机与有人机事件建模的融合操作横向安全间距研究
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jan 16;24(2):553. doi: 10.3390/s24020553.
6
Effects of In-Vehicle Touchscreen Location on Driver Task Performance, Eye Gaze Behavior, and Workload During Conditionally Automated Driving: Nondriving-Related Task and Take-Over.车内触摸屏位置对条件自动化驾驶中驾驶员任务绩效、眼动行为和工作负荷的影响:非驾驶相关任务和接管。
Hum Factors. 2024 Dec;66(12):2651-2668. doi: 10.1177/00187208241226838. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
7
Perceived difficulty, flight information access, and performance of male and female novice drone operators.男性和女性新手无人机操作员感知难度、飞行信息获取与表现。
Work. 2022;72(4):1259-1268. doi: 10.3233/WOR-210862.
8
Electroencephalographic Workload Indicators During Teleoperation of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Shepherding a Swarm of Unmanned Ground Vehicles in Contested Environments.在有争议环境中,无人机引导一群无人地面车辆进行遥操作时的脑电图工作负荷指标
Front Neurosci. 2020 Feb 14;14:40. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00040. eCollection 2020.
9
Threats from and Countermeasures for Unmanned Aerial and Underwater Vehicles.无人机和水下机器人的威胁与对策。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 May 20;22(10):3896. doi: 10.3390/s22103896.
10
Facilitating the Work of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Operators Using Artificial Intelligence: An Intelligent Filter for Command-and-Control Maps to Reduce Cognitive Workload.利用人工智能为无人机操作人员提供便利:用于指挥与控制地图的智能滤波器,以降低认知工作量。
Hum Factors. 2023 Nov;65(7):1345-1360. doi: 10.1177/00187208221081968. Epub 2022 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Advanced Vibration-Based Fault Diagnosis and Vibration Control Methods.基于振动的先进故障诊断与振动控制方法
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Sep 6;23(18):7704. doi: 10.3390/s23187704.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the Impact of Time Pressure and Automation Support in a Visual Search Task.理解视觉搜索任务中时间压力和自动化支持的影响。
Hum Factors. 2024 Mar;66(3):770-786. doi: 10.1177/00187208221111236. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
2
Exploring the performance of click and slide gestures on large in-vehicle touch screens.探究大尺寸车载触摸屏上点击和滑动手势的性能。
Appl Ergon. 2022 Feb;99:103613. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103613. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
3
Applications of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in road safety, traffic and highway infrastructure management: Recent advances and challenges.
无人机在道路安全、交通及公路基础设施管理中的应用:最新进展与挑战
Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2020 Nov;141:116-129. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2020.09.018. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
4
The influence of pilot's attention allocation on instrument reading during take-off: The mediating effect of attention span.飞行员在起飞过程中注意力分配对仪表读数的影响:注意广度的中介作用。
Appl Ergon. 2021 Jan;90:103245. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103245. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
5
Validation of the Raw National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) Questionnaire to Assess Perceived Workload in Patient Monitoring Tasks: Pooled Analysis Study Using Mixed Models.验证原始美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数(NASA-TLX)问卷在评估患者监护任务中的感知工作量的有效性:使用混合模型的 pooled 分析研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 7;22(9):e19472. doi: 10.2196/19472.
6
An easy fix for reasoning errors: Attention capturers improve reasoning performance.一个解决推理错误的简单方法:注意力捕获器提高推理表现。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Oct;73(10):1695-1702. doi: 10.1177/1747021820931499. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
7
[The "National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index" (NASA-TLX) - an instrument for measuring consultation workload within general practice: evaluation of psychometric properties].["美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数"(NASA-TLX)——一种测量全科医疗中会诊工作量的工具:心理测量特性评估]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019 Nov;147-148:90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2019.10.003. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
8
Dissecting the Neural Focus of Attention Reveals Distinct Processes for Spatial Attention and Object-Based Storage in Visual Working Memory.剖析神经注意力焦点揭示了视觉工作记忆中空间注意力和基于对象存储的不同过程。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Apr;30(4):526-540. doi: 10.1177/0956797619830384. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
9
Changes in Mental Workload and Motor Performance Throughout Multiple Practice Sessions Under Various Levels of Task Difficulty.在不同任务难度水平下的多次练习过程中,精神工作量和运动表现的变化。
Neuroscience. 2018 Nov 21;393:305-318. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.09.019. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
10
Effects of Touch, Voice, and Multimodal Input, and Task Load on Multiple-UAV Monitoring Performance During Simulated Manned-Unmanned Teaming in a Military Helicopter.触摸、语音和多模式输入以及任务负载对模拟载人-无人机协同作战中军事直升机中多架无人机监控性能的影响。
Hum Factors. 2018 Dec;60(8):1117-1129. doi: 10.1177/0018720818788995. Epub 2018 Jul 31.