Jang Byungki, Kim Han Wool, Kim Han-Sung, Park Ji Young, Seo Hyeonji, Kim Yong Kyun
Ilsong Institute of Life Science, Hallym University, Seoul 01000, Korea.
Department of Pediatrics, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang 14100, Korea.
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Oct 28;10(11):1812. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10111812.
Although there have been several studies regarding the immunogenicity of one or two booster doses of the measles−mumps−rubella (MMR) vaccine in measles-seronegative young adults, limited data are available about how long the immune response is sustained compared with natural infection. This study included seronegative healthcare workers (HCWs) (aged 21−38 years) who received one or two doses of the measles−mumps−rubella (MMR) vaccine and HCWs with laboratory-confirmed measles infection during an outbreak in 2019. We compared neutralizing antibody titers measured using the plaque reduction neutralization (PRN) test and measles-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) using chemiluminescent immunoassays 2 years after vaccination or infection. Among 107 HCWs with seronegative measles IgGs, the overall seroconversion rate of measles IgGs remained 82.2% (88/107), and 45.8% (49/107) of the participants had a medium (121−900) or high (>900) PRN titer after 2 years from one or two booster doses. The measles-neutralizing antibody titers of both PRN titer (ND50) and geometric mean concentration 2 years after natural infection were significantly higher than those of one or two booster doses of the MMR vaccine (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Our results suggest that serologic screening followed by appropriate postexposure prophylaxis can be beneficial for young HCWs without a history of natural infection especially in a measles outbreak setting, because of possible susceptibility to measles despite booster MMR vaccination 2 years ago. Long-term data about sustainable humoral immunity after one or two booster vaccination are needed based on the exact vaccination history.
尽管已有多项关于一或两剂麻疹-腮腺炎-风疹(MMR)疫苗在麻疹血清学阴性的年轻成年人中的免疫原性的研究,但与自然感染相比,关于免疫反应能持续多久的数据有限。本研究纳入了年龄在21至38岁之间、接受一或两剂麻疹-腮腺炎-风疹(MMR)疫苗的血清学阴性医护人员(HCW),以及在2019年一次疫情期间实验室确诊感染麻疹的医护人员。我们比较了在接种疫苗或感染后2年,使用蚀斑减少中和试验(PRN)测量的中和抗体滴度以及使用化学发光免疫测定法检测的麻疹特异性免疫球蛋白G(IgG)。在107名麻疹IgG血清学阴性的医护人员中,麻疹IgG的总体血清转化率仍为82.2%(88/107),45.8%(49/107)的参与者在接种一或两剂加强疫苗2年后具有中等(121 - 900)或高(>900)PRN滴度。自然感染2年后的PRN滴度(ND50)和几何平均浓度的麻疹中和抗体滴度均显著高于一或两剂MMR疫苗加强剂量后的滴度(分别为p < 0.001和p < 0.001)。我们的结果表明,对于没有自然感染史的年轻医护人员,尤其是在麻疹疫情爆发的情况下,进行血清学筛查并随后进行适当的暴露后预防可能是有益的,因为尽管2年前接种了MMR疫苗加强针,但仍可能对麻疹易感。基于确切的疫苗接种史,需要关于一或两剂加强疫苗接种后持久体液免疫的长期数据。