Jovanović Marić Jovana, Kolarević Stoimir, Đorđević Jelena, Sunjog Karolina, Nikolić Ivan, Marić Ana, Ilić Marija, Simonović Predrag, Alygizakis Nikiforos, Ng Kelsey, Oswald Peter, Slobodnik Jaroslav, Žegura Bojana, Vuković-Gačić Branka, Paunović Momir, Kračun-Kolarević Margareta
University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research "Siniša Stanković", National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, Department of Hydroecology and Water Protection, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11060 Belgrade, Serbia.
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Chair of Microbiology, Center for Genotoxicology and Ecogenotoxicology, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Mutagenesis. 2023 Feb 3;38(1):21-32. doi: 10.1093/mutage/geac024.
Environmental studies which aim to assess the ecological impact of chemical and other types of pollution should employ a complex weight-of-evidence approach with multiple lines of evidence (LoEs). This study focused on in situ genotoxicological methods such as the comet and micronucleus assays and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis as one of the multiple LoEs (LoE3) on the fish species Alburnus alburnus (bleak) as a bioindicator. The study was carried out within the Joint Danube Survey 4 (JDS4) at nine sites in the Danube River Basin in the Republic of Serbia. Out of nine sampling sites, two were situated at the Tisa, Sava, and Velika Morava rivers, and three sites were at the Danube River. The three additionally employed LoEs were: SumTUwater calculated based on the monitoring data in the database of the Serbian Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) (LoE1); in vitro analyses of JDS4 water extracts employing genotoxicological methods (LoE2); assessment of the ecological status/potential by SEPA and indication of the ecological status for the sites performed within the JDS4 (LoE4). The analyzed biomarker responses in the bleak were integrated into the unique integrated biomarker response index which was used to rank the sites. The highest pollution pressure was recorded at JDS4 39 and JDS4 36, while the lowest was at JDS4 35. The impact of pollution was confirmed at three sites, JDS4 33, 40, and 41, by all four LoEs. At other sampling sites, a difference was observed regarding the pollution depending on the employed LoEs. This indicates the importance of implementing a comprehensive weight-of-evidence approach to ensure the impact of pollution is not overlooked when using only one LoE as is often the case in environmental studies.
旨在评估化学污染和其他类型污染对生态影响的环境研究应采用一种复杂的证据权重法,运用多条证据线(LoEs)。本研究聚焦于原位遗传毒理学方法,如彗星试验和微核试验以及随机扩增多态性DNA分析,将其作为多条证据线之一(证据线3),以欧鳊(Alburnus alburnus)这一鱼类物种作为生物指示物。该研究是在多瑙河联合调查4(JDS4)期间,于塞尔维亚共和国多瑙河流域的9个地点开展的。在9个采样点中,2个位于蒂萨河、萨瓦河和大摩拉瓦河,3个位于多瑙河。另外采用的三条证据线分别是:根据塞尔维亚环境保护局(SEPA)数据库中的监测数据计算得出的SumTUwater(证据线1);采用遗传毒理学方法对JDS4水提取物进行的体外分析(证据线2);SEPA对生态状况/潜力的评估以及JDS4内各地点生态状况的指示(证据线4)。对欧鳊中分析的生物标志物反应被整合到独特的综合生物标志物反应指数中,该指数用于对各地点进行排名。在JDS4 39和JDS4 36记录到的污染压力最高,而在JDS4 35最低。所有四条证据线均证实了JDS4 33、40和41这三个地点存在污染影响。在其他采样点,根据所采用的证据线不同,观察到了污染情况的差异。这表明实施全面的证据权重法很重要,以确保在环境研究中像通常那样仅使用一条证据线时,不会忽视污染的影响。