Research Branch, Sidra Medicine, PO Box 26999, Doha, Qatar.
Laboratory of Human Genetics of Infectious Diseases, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
Sci Adv. 2022 Nov 11;8(45):eabp9961. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abp9961.
Knowledge of the mechanisms underpinning the development of protective immunity conferred by mRNA vaccines is fragmentary. Here, we investigated responses to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccination via high-temporal resolution blood transcriptome profiling. The first vaccine dose elicited modest interferon and adaptive immune responses, which peaked on days 2 and 5, respectively. The second vaccine dose, in contrast, elicited sharp day 1 interferon, inflammation, and erythroid cell responses, followed by a day 5 plasmablast response. Both post-first and post-second dose interferon signatures were associated with the subsequent development of antibody responses. Yet, we observed distinct interferon response patterns after each of the doses that may reflect quantitative or qualitative differences in interferon induction. Distinct interferon response phenotypes were also observed in patients with COVID-19 and were associated with severity and differences in duration of intensive care. Together, this study also highlights the benefits of adopting high-frequency sampling protocols in profiling vaccine-elicited immune responses.
mRNA 疫苗所诱导的保护性免疫的机制知识还很零碎。在这里,我们通过高时间分辨率的血液转录组谱分析来研究对 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)mRNA 疫苗接种的反应。第一剂疫苗引起适度的干扰素和适应性免疫反应,分别在第 2 天和第 5 天达到峰值。相比之下,第二剂疫苗则在第 1 天引起强烈的干扰素、炎症和红细胞反应,随后在第 5 天引起浆细胞反应。第一剂和第二剂疫苗后的干扰素特征都与随后的抗体反应发展有关。然而,我们在每次剂量后观察到不同的干扰素反应模式,这可能反映了干扰素诱导的定量或定性差异。在 COVID-19 患者中也观察到了不同的干扰素反应表型,这些表型与严重程度和重症监护的持续时间差异有关。总的来说,这项研究还强调了在分析疫苗诱导的免疫反应时采用高频采样方案的好处。