Suppr超能文献

自然感染、病毒攻击和疫苗接种中干扰素刺激基因的独特时间特征

Distinctive Temporal Profiles of Interferon-Stimulated Genes in Natural Infection, Viral Challenge, and Vaccination.

作者信息

Lei Hongxing

机构信息

China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.

Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.

出版信息

Viruses. 2025 Jul 29;17(8):1060. doi: 10.3390/v17081060.

Abstract

Interferon (IFN) signaling plays vital roles in host defense against viral infection. However, a variety of observations have been reported in the literature regarding the roles of IFN signaling in COVID-19. Thus, it would be important to reach a clearer picture regarding the activation or suppression of IFN signaling in COVID-19. In this work, regulation of marker genes for IFN signaling was examined in natural infection, viral challenge, and vaccination based on 13 public transcriptome datasets. Three subsets of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) were selected for detailed examination, including one set of marker genes for type I IFN signaling (ISGa) and two sets of marker genes for type II IFN signaling (IFN-γ signaling, GBPs for the GBP gene cluster, and HLAd for the HLA-D gene cluster). In natural infection, activation of ISGa and GBPs was accompanied by the suppression of HLAd in hospitalized patients. Suppression of GBPs was also observed in certain critical conditions. The scale of regulation was much greater for ISGa than that of GBPs and HLAd. In addition, the suppression of HLAd was correlated with disease severity, and it took much longer for HLAd to return to the level of healthy controls than that for ISGa and GBPs. Upon viral challenge, the activation of ISGa and GBPs was similar to that of natural infection, while the suppression of HLAd was not observed. Moreover, GBPs' return to the pre-infection level was at a faster pace than that of ISGa. Upon COVID-19 vaccination, activation was observed for all of these three gene sets, and the scale of activation was comparable for ISGa and GBPs. Notably, it took a much shorter time for GBPs and ISGa to return to the level of healthy controls than that in COVID-19 infection. In addition, the baseline values and transient activation of these gene sets were also associated with subsequent vaccination response. The intricate balance of IFN signaling was demonstrated in mild breakthrough infection, where attenuated response was observed in people with prior vaccination compared to that in vaccine-naïve subjects. Overall, distinctive temporal profiles of IFN signaling were observed in natural infection, viral challenge, and vaccination. The features observed in this work may provide novel insights into the disease management and vaccine development.

摘要

干扰素(IFN)信号传导在宿主抵御病毒感染中起着至关重要的作用。然而,文献中已报道了关于IFN信号传导在新冠病毒病(COVID-19)中作用的各种观察结果。因此,更清楚地了解COVID-19中IFN信号传导的激活或抑制情况非常重要。在这项研究中,基于13个公共转录组数据集,研究了自然感染、病毒攻击和疫苗接种中IFN信号传导标记基因的调控情况。选择了三个干扰素刺激基因(ISG)子集进行详细研究,包括一组I型IFN信号传导的标记基因(ISGa)和两组II型IFN信号传导的标记基因(IFN-γ信号传导、GBP基因簇的GBPs以及HLA-D基因簇的HLAd)。在自然感染中,住院患者的ISGa和GBPs激活伴随着HLAd的抑制。在某些危急情况下也观察到GBPs的抑制。ISGa的调控规模远大于GBPs和HLAd。此外,HLAd的抑制与疾病严重程度相关,HLAd恢复到健康对照水平所需的时间比ISGa和GBPs长得多。在病毒攻击后,ISGa和GBPs的激活与自然感染相似,而未观察到HLAd的抑制。此外,GBPs恢复到感染前水平的速度比ISGa快。在接种COVID-19疫苗后,这三个基因集均观察到激活,且ISGa和GBPs的激活规模相当。值得注意的是,与COVID-19感染相比,GBPs和ISGa恢复到健康对照水平所需的时间要短得多。此外,这些基因集的基线值和瞬时激活也与后续疫苗接种反应相关。在轻度突破性感染中证明了IFN信号传导的复杂平衡,与未接种疫苗的受试者相比,先前接种过疫苗的人观察到反应减弱。总体而言,在自然感染、病毒攻击和疫苗接种中观察到了IFN信号传导独特的时间特征。这项研究中观察到的特征可能为疾病管理和疫苗开发提供新的见解。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验