Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Research Centre for Emerging Infections and Zoonoses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Nov;7(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010276.
Previous research demonstrated that medical scent detection dogs have the ability to distinguish SARS-CoV-2 positive from negative samples with high diagnostic accuracy. To deploy these dogs as a reliable screening method, it is mandatory to examine if canines maintain their high diagnostic accuracy in real-life screening settings. We conducted a study to evaluate the performance of medical scent detection dogs under real-life circumstances.
Eight dogs were trained to detect SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR-positive samples. Four concerts with a total of 2802 participants were held to evaluate canines' performance in screening individuals for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Sweat samples were taken from all participants and presented in a line-up setting. In addition, every participant had been tested with a SARS-CoV-2 specific rapid antigen test and a RT-qPCR and they provided information regarding age, sex, vaccination status and medical disease history. The participants' infection status was unknown at the time of canine testing. Safety measures such as mask wearing and distance keeping were ensured.
The SARS-CoV-2 detection dogs achieved a diagnostic specificity of 99.93% (95% CI 99.74% to 99.99%) and a sensitivity of 81.58% (95% CI 66.58% to 90.78%), respectively. The overall rate of concordant results was 99.68%. The majority of the study population was vaccinated with varying vaccines and vaccination schemes, while several participants had chronic diseases and were under chronic medication. This did not influence dogs' decisions.
Our results demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 scent detection dogs achieved high diagnostic accuracy in a real-life scenario. The vaccination status, previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, chronic disease and medication of the participants did not influence the performance of the dogs in detecting the acute infection. This indicates that dogs provide a fast and reliable screening option for public events in which high-throughput screening is required.
先前的研究表明,医疗气味检测犬具有区分 SARS-CoV-2 阳性和阴性样本的能力,且具有较高的诊断准确性。若要将这些犬作为一种可靠的筛查方法,就必须检验犬在实际筛查环境中是否仍能保持较高的诊断准确性。我们开展了一项研究,以评估医疗气味检测犬在实际环境下的表现。
8 只犬接受了 SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR 阳性样本的检测训练。共举办了 4 场音乐会,有 2802 名参与者参与,以评估犬在筛查 SARS-CoV-2 感染个体中的表现。从所有参与者身上采集汗液样本,并以列队形式呈现。此外,每位参与者都接受了 SARS-CoV-2 特异性快速抗原检测和 RT-qPCR 检测,并提供了年龄、性别、疫苗接种状况和医疗病史信息。在犬只检测时,参与者的感染状况尚不清楚。检测过程中确保了佩戴口罩和保持距离等安全措施。
SARS-CoV-2 检测犬的诊断特异性为 99.93%(95%CI 99.74%至 99.99%),灵敏度为 81.58%(95%CI 66.58%至 90.78%)。总体结果的一致性率为 99.68%。研究人群中的大多数人接种了不同的疫苗和接种方案,而少数参与者患有慢性疾病并正在接受慢性药物治疗。但这并未影响犬的决策。
我们的研究结果表明,SARS-CoV-2 气味检测犬在实际场景中实现了较高的诊断准确性。参与者的疫苗接种状况、以前的 SARS-CoV-2 感染、慢性疾病和用药情况并未影响犬检测急性感染的性能。这表明,犬可以为需要高通量筛查的公共活动提供一种快速、可靠的筛查选择。