Chaber Anne-Lise, Hazel Susan, Matthews Brett, Withers Alexander, Alvergnat Guillaume, Grandjean Dominique, Caraguel Charles
School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, South Australia, Australia.
Detector Dog Program, Operational Strategy and Coordination, Australian Border Force, Bulla, Australia.
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022 Sep;69(5):e1951-e1958. doi: 10.1111/tbed.14529. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is currently the standard diagnostic method to detect symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals infected with Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, RT-PCR results are not immediate and may falsely be negative before an infected individual sheds viral particles in the upper airways where swabs are collected. Infected individuals emit volatile organic compounds in their breath and sweat that are detectable by trained dogs. Here, we evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dog detection against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Fifteen dogs previously trained at two centres in Australia were presented to axillary sweat specimens collected from known SARS-CoV-2 human cases (n = 100) and non-cases (n = 414). The true infection status of the cases and non-cases were confirmed based on RT-PCR results as well as clinical presentation. Across dogs, the overall diagnostic sensitivity (DSe) was 95.3% (95%CI: 93.1-97.6%) and diagnostic specificity (DSp) was 97.1% (95%CI: 90.7-100.0%). The DSp decreased significantly when non-case specimens were collected over 1 min rather than 20 min (p value = .004). The location of evaluation did not impact the detection performances. The accuracy of detection varied across dogs and experienced dogs revealed a marginally better DSp (p value = .016). The potential and limitations of this alternative detection tool are discussed.
逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)是目前检测感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的有症状和无症状个体的标准诊断方法。然而,RT-PCR结果并非即时可得,在受感染个体在上呼吸道(即采集拭子的部位)排出病毒颗粒之前,检测结果可能会出现假阴性。受感染个体呼出的气体和汗液中会释放出挥发性有机化合物,训练有素的狗能够检测到这些物质。在此,我们评估了狗检测SARS-CoV-2感染的诊断准确性。将先前在澳大利亚两个中心接受训练的15只狗用于检测从已知的SARS-CoV-2人类病例(n = 100)和非病例(n = 414)采集的腋窝汗液样本。根据RT-PCR结果以及临床表现确认病例和非病例的真实感染状况。在所有参与检测的狗中,总体诊断敏感性(DSe)为95.3%(95%置信区间:93.1 - 97.6%),诊断特异性(DSp)为97.1%(95%置信区间:90.7 - 100.0%)。当采集非病例样本的时间超过1分钟而非20分钟时,DSp显著下降(p值 = 0.004)。评估地点并未影响检测性能。不同狗的检测准确性各不相同,经验丰富的狗的DSp略高(p值 = 0.016)。本文还讨论了这种替代检测工具的潜力和局限性。