• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

去骨瓣减压铰链与去骨瓣减压术治疗后颅内压-容积关系的比较:一项人体尸体研究。

The intracranial pressure-volume relationship following decompressive hinge craniotomy compared to decompressive craniectomy-a human cadaver study.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Forensic Medicine, Section of Forensic Pathology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Feb;165(2):271-277. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05409-1. Epub 2022 Nov 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00701-022-05409-1
PMID:36369396
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Decompressive hinge craniotomy (DHC) is an alternative treatment option to decompressive craniectomy (DC) for elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). The aim of this study was to characterize the difference in pressure-volume relationship between DHC and DC.

METHODS

We compared the intracranial pressure-volume relationship in a human cadaver model following either DHC, DC, or fixing of the bone plate by titanium clamps. We inserted an intracranial expandable device in two human cadaver specimens, performed either DHC, DC, or bone plate fixation, and gradually increased the intracranial volume while measuring ICP. Following DHC, we also performed CT-scans at pre-defined intervals.

RESULTS

Before ICP exceeded a threshold of 20 mmHg, a fixed bone plate tolerated an increase of 130 ml of intracranial volume, while DHC and DC allowed an increase of 190 ml and 290 ml, respectively. CT-derived calculations following DHC determined that the increase in intracranial volume at ICP 22 mmHg was 65 ml, the maximal increase of intracranial volume was 84 ml, the maximal bone displacement was 21 mm, and the bone plate volume to be 82 ml. Manual stress test of the hinged bone plate did not allow misalignment or intracranial displacement of the bone plate.

CONCLUSION

DHC increases the intracranial volume by up to 84 ml and allows for approximately 60 ml increase of intracranial volume before ICP exceeds 20 mmHg. This indicates, when comparing with results from previous studies of herniation volumes, that DHC will be sufficient in many patients with head injury or cerebral infarction with treatment refractory intracranial hypertension.

摘要

目的

减压铰链开颅术(DHC)是治疗颅内压升高(ICP)的另一种替代去骨瓣减压术(DC)的方法。本研究旨在描述 DHC 和 DC 之间压力-容积关系的差异。

方法

我们比较了在人类尸体模型中分别进行 DHC、DC 或使用钛夹固定骨板后颅内压力-容积关系。我们在两个人类尸体标本中插入颅内可扩张装置,分别进行 DHC、DC 或骨板固定,并在测量 ICP 的同时逐渐增加颅内体积。在 DHC 后,我们还在预定义的间隔时间进行 CT 扫描。

结果

在 ICP 超过 20mmHg 的阈值之前,固定的骨板可以耐受 130ml 的颅内体积增加,而 DHC 和 DC 分别允许增加 190ml 和 290ml。DHC 后的 CT 计算确定 ICP 为 22mmHg 时颅内体积的增加为 65ml,最大颅内体积增加为 84ml,最大骨位移为 21mm,骨板体积为 82ml。对铰链骨板进行手动应力测试时,骨板不会发生错位或颅内移位。

结论

DHC 可将颅内体积增加最多 84ml,并允许在 ICP 超过 20mmHg 之前增加约 60ml 的颅内体积。与先前关于脑疝体积的研究结果相比,这表明在许多头部损伤或脑梗死伴治疗性颅内高压的患者中,DHC 将足够有效。

相似文献

1
The intracranial pressure-volume relationship following decompressive hinge craniotomy compared to decompressive craniectomy-a human cadaver study.去骨瓣减压铰链与去骨瓣减压术治疗后颅内压-容积关系的比较:一项人体尸体研究。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Feb;165(2):271-277. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05409-1. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
2
Hinge craniotomy versus standard decompressive hemicraniectomy: an experimental preclinical comparative study.铰链开颅术与标准去骨瓣减压术的比较:一项实验性临床前对比研究。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Sep;165(9):2365-2375. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05715-2. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
3
Cranial decompression for the treatment of malignant intracranial hypertension after ischemic cerebral infarction: decompressive craniectomy and hinge craniotomy.去骨瓣减压术和铰链式开颅术治疗缺血性脑梗死后脑恶性颅内高压
J Neurosurg. 2012 Jun;116(6):1289-98. doi: 10.3171/2012.2.JNS111772. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
4
Dynamic telescopic craniotomy: a cadaveric study of a novel device and technique.动态可伸缩颅骨切开术:一种新型装置和技术的尸体研究。
J Neurosurg. 2016 Sep;125(3):674-82. doi: 10.3171/2015.6.JNS15706. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
5
The resilience of a dead brain: commentary to "The intracranial pressure-volume relationship following decompressive hinge craniotomy compared to decompressive craniectomy-a human cadaver study".死亡大脑的弹性:对“减压性铰链开颅术与减压性颅骨切除术相比后的颅内压-容积关系——一项人体尸体研究”的评论
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Feb;165(2):279. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05414-4. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
6
Biomechanics of a novel reversibly expandable dynamic craniotomy bone flap fixation plate.新型可反复扩张的动力开颅骨瓣固定钢板的生物力学。
J Neurosurg. 2019 Jan 4;132(2):560-567. doi: 10.3171/2018.8.JNS172614. Print 2020 Feb 1.
7
A comparison of hinge craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of malignant intracranial hypertension: early clinical and radiographic analysis.铰链式开颅术与去骨瓣减压术治疗恶性颅内高压的比较:早期临床及影像学分析
Neurosurg Focus. 2009 Jun;26(6):E6. doi: 10.3171/2009.4.FOCUS0960.
8
Dynamic Decompressive Craniotomy with a Novel Reversibly Expandable Plate.使用新型可逆扩张板的动态减压开颅术
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2017 Jul;78(4):386-389. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1594013. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
9
Optimal Bone Flap Size for Decompressive Craniectomy for Refractory Increased Intracranial Pressure in Traumatic Brain Injury: Taking the Patient's Head Size into Account.创伤性脑损伤难治性颅内压增高去骨瓣减压术中的最佳骨瓣大小:考虑患者的头围。
World Neurosurg. 2020 May;137:e430-e436. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.232. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
10
The value of intraoperative intracranial pressure monitoring for predicting re-operation using salvage decompressive craniectomy after craniotomy in patients with traumatic mass lesions.术中颅内压监测对预测创伤性肿块性病变患者开颅术后行挽救性减压颅骨切除术再次手术的价值。
BMC Surg. 2015 Oct 14;15:111. doi: 10.1186/s12893-015-0100-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Decompressive Craniectomy and Hinged Craniotomy for Traumatic Brain Injury: Experience in Two Centers in a Middle-Income Country.减压性颅骨切除术和带蒂颅骨切开术治疗创伤性脑损伤:一个中等收入国家两个中心的经验
Korean J Neurotrauma. 2024 Oct 8;20(4):252-261. doi: 10.13004/kjnt.2024.20.e36. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Effectiveness of hinge craniotomy as an alternative to decompressive craniectomy for acute subdural hematoma.铰链开颅术治疗急性硬膜下血肿的疗效优于去骨瓣减压术。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Jun 18;166(1):272. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06167-y.
3
Hinge craniotomy versus standard decompressive hemicraniectomy: an experimental preclinical comparative study.
铰链开颅术与标准去骨瓣减压术的比较:一项实验性临床前对比研究。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Sep;165(9):2365-2375. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05715-2. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
4
Technical Optimization of Decompressive Craniectomy for Possible Conversion to Hinge Craniotomy in Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤中减压性颅骨切除术转换为铰链式开颅术的技术优化
Cureus. 2023 May 31;15(5):e39767. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39767. eCollection 2023 May.