Zou Tong, Stern Hal S
Department of Statistics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92617, USA.
Forensic Sci Int. 2022 Dec;341:111512. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111512. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
In this work, we explore the application of likelihood ratio as a forensic evidence assessment tool to evaluate the causal mechanism of a bloodstain pattern. It is assumed that there are two competing hypotheses regarding the cause of a bloodstain pattern. The bloodstain patterns are represented as a collection of ellipses with each ellipse characterized by its location, size and orientation. Quantitative measures and features are derived to summarize key aspects of the patterns. A bivariate Gaussian model is chosen to estimate the distribution of features under a given hypothesis and thus approximate the likelihood of a pattern. Published data with 59 impact patterns and 55 gunshot patterns is used to train and evaluate the model. Results demonstrate the feasibility of the likelihood ratio approach for bloodstain pattern analysis. The results also hint at some of the challenges that need to be addressed for future use of the likelihood ratio approach for bloodstain pattern analysis.
在这项工作中,我们探索似然比作为一种法医证据评估工具在评估血迹形态因果机制方面的应用。假设关于血迹形态的成因存在两种相互竞争的假设。血迹形态被表示为椭圆的集合,每个椭圆由其位置、大小和方向来表征。通过推导定量测量和特征来总结这些形态的关键方面。选择双变量高斯模型来估计给定假设下特征的分布,从而近似某种形态的似然性。使用包含59个撞击形态和55个枪击形态的已发表数据来训练和评估该模型。结果证明了似然比方法用于血迹形态分析的可行性。结果还暗示了未来将似然比方法用于血迹形态分析时需要解决的一些挑战。