• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在高狂犬病流行地区存在狂犬病和抗菌药物耐药性双重风险的可能性:在乌干达因狗咬伤而感染的细菌分离物中检测到抗生素耐药性。

The potential for the double risk of rabies and antimicrobial resistance in a high rabies endemic setting: detection of antibiotic resistance in bacterial isolates from infected dog bite wounds in Uganda.

机构信息

University of Nairobi Institute of Tropical and Infectious Diseases, Nairobi, Kenya.

School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

出版信息

Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 Nov 13;11(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01181-0.

DOI:10.1186/s13756-022-01181-0
PMID:36372895
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9655799/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Post-exposure treatment for dog bites in humans aims at alleviating the risk of rabies and promoting wound healing. Wound healing may be complicated by bacteria. This study identified the different bacteria and their antibiotic susceptibilities in infected dog bite wounds (DBWs) in Uganda.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted among 376 dog bite patients. Wound swabs from patients with infected DBWs were collected and inoculated into recommended media. They were cultured for both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. All isolated bacteria were identified based on colony characteristics, gram stain, and standard biochemical tests. Molecular identification was performed for strains that were resistant to three or more antibiotics. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was conducted using the disc diffusion method following the modified Kirby-Bauer method. The data were analysed using Stata version 15 software.

RESULTS

Approximately half of the patients (52.9%, 199/376) presented with infected wounds. Majority of the swabs (84.4%, 168/199) were culture positive, and yielded a total of 768 isolates where about half (52.9%, 406/768) were gram positive bacteria, and about two-thirds (64.6%, 496/768) were recovered from category II wounds. Among the gram positive bacteria, 339 (83.5%) were aerobes where Staphylococcus aureus (103, 30.4%), Coagulase-negative staphylococci (68, 20.1%), and Corynebacterium spp (33, 9.7%) had the highest prevalence. For the 362 Gram negative isolates, 217 (59.9%) were aerobes and the commonest isolates were P. maltocida (64, 29.5%), Capnocytophaga canimorsus (36, 16.6%) and P. canis (26, 12.0%). Gram-positive isolates were resistant to metronidazole (93.6%), oxacillin (68.5%), ceftriaxone (14.6%) and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (14.0%). Gram negative isolates were resistant to metronidazole (100%), ampicillin (30.7%), oxacillin (29.3%), and doxycycline (22.9%). Multidrug resistance was in 105 (29.0%) and 121/406 (29.8%) of the gram-negative and gram-positive isolates, respectively. All gram-positive isolates were susceptible to vancomycin and ciprofloxacin.

CONCLUSIONS

Infection rates of DBWs in Uganda are high and the dominant bacterial isolates are Staphylococcus aureus, Pasteurella spps, and Capnocytophaga canimorsus. Multidrug resistance to commonly used antibiotics is high. The recommendation in the Uganda Clinical Guidelines to use metronidazole in the management of DBWs should be reviewed. DBWs should be enlisted for routine antimicrobial resistance surveillance and rational use of antimicrobial agents should be promoted.

摘要

背景

对人类的狗咬伤进行暴露后治疗旨在减轻狂犬病的风险并促进伤口愈合。伤口愈合可能会因细菌感染而变得复杂。本研究旨在确定乌干达感染的狗咬伤(DBW)中的不同细菌及其抗生素敏感性。

方法

对 376 名狗咬伤患者进行了横断面研究。从患有感染性 DBW 的患者的伤口拭子中采集样本,并接种到推荐的培养基中。对其进行需氧菌和厌氧菌的培养。根据菌落特征、革兰氏染色和标准生化试验对所有分离的细菌进行鉴定。对耐药性达三种或以上抗生素的菌株进行分子鉴定。采用改良 Kirby-Bauer 法的纸片扩散法进行抗生素敏感性试验。使用 Stata 版本 15 软件进行数据分析。

结果

约一半的患者(52.9%,199/376)出现感染伤口。约 84.4%(168/199)的拭子培养呈阳性,共分离出 768 株细菌,其中约一半(52.9%,406/768)为革兰氏阳性菌,约三分之二(64.6%,496/768)来自 II 类伤口。在革兰氏阳性菌中,339 株(83.5%)为需氧菌,其中金黄色葡萄球菌(103 株,30.4%)、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(68 株,20.1%)和棒状杆菌属(33 株,9.7%)的检出率最高。在 362 株革兰氏阴性菌中,217 株(59.9%)为需氧菌,最常见的分离物为麦芽糖普雷沃菌(64 株,29.5%)、卡他莫拉菌(36 株,16.6%)和犬小杆菌(26 株,12.0%)。革兰氏阳性菌对甲硝唑(93.6%)、苯唑西林(68.5%)、头孢曲松(14.6%)和阿莫西林/克拉维酸(14.0%)耐药。革兰氏阴性菌对甲硝唑(100%)、氨苄西林(30.7%)、苯唑西林(29.3%)和强力霉素(22.9%)耐药。105 株(29.0%)革兰氏阴性菌和 121 株(29.8%)革兰氏阳性菌存在多药耐药性。所有革兰氏阳性菌均对万古霉素和环丙沙星敏感。

结论

乌干达 DBW 的感染率较高,主要的细菌分离株为金黄色葡萄球菌、巴氏杆菌属和卡他莫拉菌。对常用抗生素的多药耐药性很高。乌干达临床指南建议在 DBW 管理中使用甲硝唑,应予以审查。DBW 应纳入常规抗菌药物耐药性监测,应促进合理使用抗菌药物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1d5/9655799/c57e2df26310/13756_2022_1181_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1d5/9655799/c57e2df26310/13756_2022_1181_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1d5/9655799/c57e2df26310/13756_2022_1181_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The potential for the double risk of rabies and antimicrobial resistance in a high rabies endemic setting: detection of antibiotic resistance in bacterial isolates from infected dog bite wounds in Uganda.在高狂犬病流行地区存在狂犬病和抗菌药物耐药性双重风险的可能性:在乌干达因狗咬伤而感染的细菌分离物中检测到抗生素耐药性。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 Nov 13;11(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01181-0.
2
Bacterial profile and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in cancer patients.癌症患者的细菌谱及抗菌药物敏感性模式
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 15;17(4):e0266919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266919. eCollection 2022.
3
The bacteriology and antimicrobial susceptibility of infected and non-infected dog bite wounds: fifty cases.感染与未感染犬咬伤伤口的细菌学及抗菌药敏性:50例病例
Vet Microbiol. 2008 Mar 18;127(3-4):360-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.09.004. Epub 2007 Sep 18.
4
Antibiotics resistance as a major public health concern: A pharmaco-epidemiological study to evaluate prevalence and antibiotics susceptibility-resistance pattern of bacterial isolates from multiple teaching hospitals.抗生素耐药性作为主要的公共卫生关注点:一项药物流行病学研究,评估来自多家教学医院的细菌分离株的流行率和抗生素敏感性-耐药性模式。
J Infect Public Health. 2023 Dec;16 Suppl 1:61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2023.09.019. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
5
Antimicrobial resistance in pathogenic aerobic bacteria causing surgical site infections in Mbarara regional referral hospital, Southwestern Uganda.乌干达西南部姆巴拉拉地区转诊医院手术部位感染的病原菌需氧细菌的抗菌药物耐药性
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 21;9(1):17299. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53712-2.
6
Bullet-related bacterial wound infections among injured personnel at emergency site hospitals in Bahir Dar: prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility and associated factors.在 Bahir Dar 的急诊医院中,与子弹相关的创伤人员细菌伤口感染:流行率、抗生素敏感性和相关因素。
BMC Microbiol. 2024 May 16;24(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12866-024-03324-2.
7
BACTERIAL PROFILE, ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, AND FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH URINARY TRACT INFECTION AMONG PREGNANT WOMEN AT HOSANNA TOWN HEALTH FACILITIES, CENTRAL ETHIOPIA.埃塞俄比亚中南部霍萨纳镇医疗机构孕妇尿路感染的细菌谱、抗菌药物耐药性及相关因素。
Georgian Med News. 2023 Sep(342):113-121.
8
[Analysis of distribution and drug resistance of pathogens from the wounds of 1 310 thermal burn patients].[1310例热烧伤患者创面病原菌分布及耐药性分析]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2018 Nov 20;34(11):802-808. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.11.016.
9
Prevalence of methicillin resistant , multidrug resistant and extended spectrum β-lactamase producing gram negative bacilli causing wound infections at a tertiary care hospital of Nepal.尼泊尔一家三级护理医院伤口感染的耐甲氧西林、多药耐药和产超广谱 β-内酰胺酶革兰氏阴性杆菌的流行情况。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018 Oct 8;7:121. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0408-z. eCollection 2018.
10
[Analysis of the pathogenic characteristics of 162 severely burned patients with bloodstream infection].162例严重烧伤合并血流感染患者的致病特征分析
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 20;32(9):529-35. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2016.09.004.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibiotic Susceptibility of Zoonotic Bacteria Isolated From Oral Cavities of Indigenous Dogs From Semi-Urban Areas in Uganda.从乌干达半城市地区本土犬口腔中分离出的人畜共患病细菌的抗生素敏感性
Vet Med Sci. 2025 Jan;11(1):e70169. doi: 10.1002/vms3.70169.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of an efficient veterinary rabies vaccine production process in the avian suspension cell line AGE1.CR.pIX.在禽类悬浮细胞系 AGE1.CR.pIX 中开发高效兽用狂犬病疫苗生产工艺。
BMC Biotechnol. 2022 Jun 17;22(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12896-022-00747-5.
2
Vaccinating children in high-endemic rabies regions: what are we waiting for?在狂犬病高流行地区为儿童接种疫苗:我们还在等什么?
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Feb;6(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004074.
3
Epidemiology and preclinical management of dog bites among humans in Wakiso and Kampala districts, Uganda: Implications for prevention of dog bites and rabies.
乌干达瓦基索和坎帕拉地区人类被狗咬伤的流行病学和临床前管理:对预防狗咬伤和狂犬病的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 21;15(9):e0239090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239090. eCollection 2020.
4
Long term trends and spatial distribution of animal bite injuries and deaths due to human rabies infection in Uganda, 2001-2015.乌干达 2001-2015 年因人类狂犬病感染导致的动物咬伤伤害和死亡的长期趋势和空间分布。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 21;13(8):e0198568. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198568. eCollection 2018.
5
Bacterial Isolates and Their Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Wound Infections among Inpatients and Outpatients Attending the University of Gondar Referral Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西北部贡德尔大学转诊医院住院和门诊患者伤口感染的细菌分离株及其抗菌药敏模式
Int J Microbiol. 2017;2017:8953829. doi: 10.1155/2017/8953829. Epub 2017 Mar 12.
6
A wide spectrum of fastidious and ampicillin-susceptible bacteria dominate in animal-caused wounds.在动物致伤伤口中,多种苛养菌和对氨苄西林敏感的细菌占主导地位。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016 Aug;35(8):1315-21. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2667-z. Epub 2016 May 19.
7
Antibiotic Management of Animal Bites in Children During the Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Era.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌时代儿童动物咬伤的抗生素管理
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2013 Dec;2(4):379-81. doi: 10.1093/jpids/pis096. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
8
Bacteriology and antibiogram of pathogens from wound infections at Dessie Laboratory, North-east Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚东北部德西实验室伤口感染病原体的细菌学及抗菌谱分析
Tanzan J Health Res. 2011 Oct;13(4):68-74. doi: 10.4314/thrb.v13i4.64901.
9
Animal and Human Bite Wounds.动物咬伤和人类咬伤伤口
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015 Jun 19;112(25):433-42; quiz 443. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0433.
10
Bacterial Zoonoses Transmitted by Household Pets: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives for Targeted Research and Policy Actions.由家庭宠物传播的细菌性人畜共患病:针对性研究与政策行动的现状与未来展望
J Comp Pathol. 2016 Jul;155(1 Suppl 1):S27-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2015.03.004. Epub 2015 May 7.